City Council agenda

Oct 19, 2026
HTML   PDF
[Official Agenda]

One Meeting Portal

Open Meeting Portal

Previous (regular) meeting
HTML   PDF
[Official Agenda]

All City Public Meetings

2025 Cambridge
Candidate Pages
(updated frequently)

Calendar of 2025
Election-related events

Local News Sources

Camberville & Beyond
(Boston Globe)

In Memory

Cambridge Ideas

These essays originally appeared in The Alewife in 2006-2007.

Cambridge Recycles

Information on
Home Composting
in Cambridge

Archive of all City Council and School Committee election results, 1941-2025 (PDF)

International Night Out – October 19, 2026 Cambridge City Council meeting

There are a number of interesting and relevant items on this week’s agenda, but that’s not what will be bring out the radical fringe. For that we have two fallacy-filled Orders from the DSA councillors (Al-Zubi and Sobrinho-Wheeler) relating to Israel and Palestine. It will be interesting to see if any other councillors join the party.

Here are the items that drew my attention:

Manager’s Agenda #1. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a Federal update including an update on relevant court cases. [text of report]

Manager’s Agenda #2. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a recommendation that in accordance with the requirements of the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA), the Cambridge City Council amend and clarify the FY27 Public Investment Bond Authorization of $12,795,000 and the FY26 Public Investment Bond Authorization of $19,986,000 for building repairs across Cambridge Public Schools. [text of report]

Manager’s Agenda #11. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a response to AR26-14 regarding a comprehensive review of existing safety and security measures at Cambridge City Hall. [text of report]

Manager’s Agenda #12. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to PO26#81 and AR26-55 (PO26#148) regarding Multifamily Housing communications. [text of report]

Order #2. That the City Manager is requested to review and reconsider the Harvard Square Kiosk Operating and Stewardship Model.   Councillor McGovern, Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Simmons, Councillor Flaherty

Order #3. That the City Council go on record opposing Massachusetts’ 2026 ballot question 5 on limiting state revenue due to the consequences this would have for the City of Cambridge and other municipalities across the Commonwealth.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor McGovern, Councillor Al-Zubi, Mayor Siddiqui

Order #4. That the City Manager is requested to work with the Election Commission, Communications staff, and other relevant departments to encourage residents to utilize the early voting sites or vote by mail and to prioritize communication of the need for voters to plan for enough time to vote, given the complexity of the ballots.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Simmons

Order #6. Fare-free MBTA Route 1, developed jointly with the City of Boston.   Councillor Al-Zubi, Vice Mayor Azeem, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor McGovern

Order #7. City Council Divestment from companies complicit in the Genocide, Apartheid, and Occupation of Palestinians.   Councillor Al-Zubi, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler

Order #8. That the City Manager is requested to direct the City Solicitor to provide the Ordinance Committee, before its hearing, with an opinion on the proposed ordinance under M.G.L. c. 30B and applicable federal law to boycott companies complicit in Israel’s Apartheid, Genocide, and Illegal Occupation of Palestine.   Councillor Al-Zubi, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler

Order #9. City Council support of the Artificial Intelligence Civil Rights Act of 2025 (S.3308 / H.R.6356) and urge Congress to enact strong, enforceable civil rights protections for automated systems used in consequential decisions.   Mayor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor Azeem, Councillor Nolan

Order #11. That the MWRA reconsider plans to construct a 10-million-gallon CSO storage tank beneath Magazine Beach.   Councillor Zusy, Councillor Nolan, Mayor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor Azeem

Order #12. Reaffirming the City Council’s commitment to high-quality health care for all residents and its strong support of H.1405/S.860, An Act establishing Medicare for All in Massachusetts.   Councillor Al-Zubi, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Nolan, Mayor Siddiqui

Committee Reports #1. The Housing Committee held a public hearing on Oct 1, 2026 to have a roundtable discussion with several arts and cultural institutions in Central Square on planning and cultural preservation in Central Square. [text of report]

Comments and additional details to follow

Local Walks/Hikes – Boston Walking Meetup Group (BWMG), AMC, DCR, etc.

Sun, Oct 18. Middlesex Canal, Winchester/Medford. 3-mi. level history walk will follow the route of the Middlesex Canal through parts of Medford and Winchester. Meet 1:30pm at Sandy (Shannon) Beach lot at Upper Mystic Lake on Mystic Valley Pkwy., 1.3 mi. N of Rte. 60. Joint w/BWMG and Middlesex Canal Association. Info: www.middlesexcanal.org. Leader: Robert Winters [https://www.meetup.com/boston-walking/events/316949820/]

Sun, Oct 18. Fresh Pond Sunset Walk. [BWMG] Meet at 4:30pm (EDT) at intersection of Huron Ave. and Aberdeen Ave., Cambridge.

Sun, Oct 25. Fresh Pond Sunset Walk. [BWMG] Meet at 4:30pm (EDT) at intersection of Huron Ave. and Aberdeen Ave., Cambridge.

If you would like to walk and talk (history, civics, politics, mathematics, or anything else), I am almost always on the Fresh Pond Sunset Walk every Sunday. - Robert Winters

Margaret Hamilton has died. Her software guided the Apollo missions. (New York Times, Oct 7, 2026)

Margaret Hamilton, pioneering programmer whose software rescued the first moon landing, dies at 90 (by Bryan Marquard, Boston Globe, Oct 8, 2026)

Margaret was a neighbor on Inman Street who I got to know a bit in recent years. Having grown up during the years of the Apollo missions, I have considered it a great privilege to have had the opportunity to meet some of the people who were substantially involved in those missions. Margaret passed away on September 30. - RW

Hexus Nexus – October 5, 2026 Cambridge City Council meeting

I’ll definitely have more to say about this week’s agenda - especially about the arrival of the long-delayed Nexus Study on Inclusionary Zoning - but here are the main attractions for this week’s one ring circus:

Manager’s Agenda #1. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointment of Seth Minkoff to the Commission on Immigrant Rights and Citizenship (CIRC). [text of report]
Appointment Confirmed 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #4. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, conveying a response to AR26-32 regarding food vending in parks. [text of report]
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler; comments by JSW, Zusy, Siddiqui, Nolan; referred to Gov’t Operations 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #5. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to an Inclusionary Zoning Report. [Manager’s Letter][CDD/Housing Recommendations][Nexus Report]
pulled by Al-Zubi; comments by Al-Zubi, McGovern, Azeem, Simmons, Nolan, Flaherty, Zusy, Siddiqui; Referred to Ordinance Committee 9-0

Order #1. That the proposed language for “Tenant Notification of Property Sale” be forwarded to the Ordinance Committee for hearing and report.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Al-Zubi, Councillor McGovern, Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Nolan
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler; comments by JSW, McGovern, Nolan (add as sponsor), Flaherty, Siddiqui; Order Referred to Ordinance Committee as Amended 9-0

Order #2. That the City Manager is requested to work with relevant City staff to advocate for a stronger level of CSO Control and virtual CSO elimination by 2050 in the CSO Control Plan and to advocate for broader funding across the state and entire MWRA region, and for additional federal funding.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Mayor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor Azeem
pulled by Al-Zubi; comments by Nolan, Al-Zubi (w/amendment), Zusy (references to Magazine Beach CSO project), Deputy City Manager Kathy Watkins, Flaherty (cost concerns), McGovern, Siddiqui; Al-Zubi amendment Adopted 9-0; Order Adopted as Amended 9-0

Charter Right #1. Postponing the roll out of the Outer Huron Bike Lanes from the Bicycle Safety Ordinance until we solve the parking problem. [Charter Right – Zusy, Sept 28, 2026]
comments by Zusy w/amendment (calling for one-year delay so that City can install Permit Parking only signs on one side of the street), McGovern (double talk), Simmons, Flaherty (emphasizing the myriad destinations in this area that need parking), Nolan (not supportive of original, OK w/McGovern/Siddiqui substitute), Siddiqui, Al-Zubi (quotes a study suggesting these spaces not filled), Brooke McKenna (occupancy of parking spaces varies by time of year, time of day; suggesting change in regulation of parking - unrestricted in day, resident-only overnight, only golfers in their lot w/placards, changes along Glacken Field - no success in locating any off-street parking), Zusy (on when changes in parking regulations could be implemented), Nolan, McGovern (suggests use of golf course lot for evening events at Russell Center/VFW), Simmons (asks if Parkside Place were agreeable to allowing use of their parking, would it be free? - No), Kathy Watkins (not optimistic about any alternate parking), Siddiqui (asserts that majority oppose any delay); Zusy amendment Fails 4-5 (BA,TF,DS,CZ-Yes; AAZ,MM,PN,JSW,SS-No); Zusy will not support McGovern/Siddiqui amendment because it doesn’t do anything and sends the wrong message; Flaherty agrees that the substitute is disingenuous and proposal unfairly impacts this neighborhood; McGovern/Siddiqui substitute Adopted 6-3 (AAZ,BA,MM,PN,JSW,SS-Yes; TF,DS,CZ-No)

Charter Right #2. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the relevant staff and departments to implement the recommendations following the May 2025 Human Services & Veterans Committee meeting, such as strengthening anti-poverty measures, establishing a dedicated CARE Team call and referral line, prioritizing commercial sexual exploitation and trafficking prevention efforts for LGBTQIA+ youth, and report back to the City Council on progress. [Charter Right – Nolan, Sept 28, 2026]
Nolan comments on protection of sex workers not arresting or prosecuting those who sell work (“this line of work”), supports full decriminalization of sex workers, but not for those who buy it, proposed amendments to the Order; Sobrinho-Wheeler (“whatever line of work you are in”, draws parallel with cannabis legalization); McGovern (“It’s the right thing to so, we have heard a lot from people in the industry.”), Zusy (has questions for police or other City staff - “Is Cambridge Police involved in enforcement against sex workers?”), Shameka Gregory (Executive Director, Domestic and Gender-Based Violence Prevention Initiative (DGBVPI)) responds - many opinions on this, but unanimous support for protections of sex workers, lack of trust in law enforcement; Simmons comments (noting that CPS does not prioritize arrest people for sex work); Azeem calls question (9-0); amendments Adopted 8-0-0-1 (Flaherty-Present); Al-Zubi added as sponsor w/comments; Siddiqui, Simmons comments; Order Adopted as Amended 8-0-0-1 (Flaherty-Present)

192 Communications (including one supposedly from Art Vandelay - for those who get the joke)

Late Resolution #4. Resolution honoring Stephen Henry Kaiser, Ph.D.   Councillor Zusy
Councillor Zusy notes that Steve is currently in Mt. Auburn Hospital with pneumonia

Comments?

Election Commission Notices

Advance Removal and Depositing of Ballots for the State Election, November 3, 2026
Sept 30, 2026 – Under the provisions of “The Votes Act”, early voting ballots may be processed in advance of Election Day. The City of Cambridge Election Commission will conduct advance removal of voted State Election ballots on Mon, Oct 26; Tues, Octr 27; Wed, Oct 28; and Thurs, Oct 29 beginning at 9:00am at the City Hall Annex, 344 Broadway, 2nd Floor Conference Room. The voted ballots will be removed from their sealed envelopes and prepared for advance depositing. The advance depositing of voted State Election ballots will be conducted on Fri, Oct 30 beginning at 9:00am at the City Hall Annex, 344 Broadway, 2nd Floor Conference Room. The voted ballots will be placed in a tabulator and counted. Both processes will be open for public observation. If you have any questions, please call (617) 349-4361.

Post-processing of Ballots for the State Election, November 3, 2026
Sept 30, 2026 – Under the provisions of “The Votes Act”, ballots may be processed after Election Day, Nov 3, 2026. The post-processing of ballots will be held on Tues, Nov 10, 2026, beginning at 9am at the Citywide Senior Center, Windsor Room, 806 Mass. Ave. Please use the rear entrance of the center on Green Street on the scheduled day. This process will be open for public observation. If you have any questions, please call (617) 349-4361.

The Taxman Cometh – September 28, 2026 Cambridge City Council meeting

There’s a lotta money on the table this week – setting the rates for the Fall tax bills, and a scheduled rally by the Teachers Union (a.k.a. Cambridge Education Association) to substantially jack up the School Department budget. There’s also a common-sense proposal to delay or stop the removal of parking on the section of Huron Ave. west of the golf course that challenges the dogma of the Cambridge Bicycle Safety crowd. There are also a couple of City Board appointments, an announcement that my pal Jason Weeks will be moving on after many years at the Cambridge Arts Council, a proposal for some minor adjustments to the Multi-Family Housing Ordinance, and more!

Here are the items that drew my attention:

Tax Rate Hearing (6:30pm): A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the FY27 tax rate. [City Manager’s Letter][Tax Rate Orders]
comments by Nolan, Zusy, McGovern, Sobrinho-Wheeler, Claire Spinner (Finance), Gayle Willett (Assessing), Flaherty, Yi-An Huang (low tax rates, high property values, highest budgets for broader and deeper services), Al-Zubi, Azeem, Nolan, Siddiqui; Order 1a Adopted 8-0-1 (DS-Absent); Nolan explains equity issues re: flat Residential Exemption; Order 1b Adopted 9-0; Placed on File 9-0; Reconsideration Fails 0-9

The bottom line is: The FY27 Adopted Operating Budget is $1.033 billion which is an increase of 4.1% (or $41 million) over the FY26 Adopted Budget. The actual FY27 tax levy required to support the FY27 Budget is $725,384,189 which is an increase of $46,531,718 or 6.85% from FY26, consistent with the estimate presented when the budget was adopted in June 2026.

TO BE EDITED The property tax levy increase of 6.85% is lower than the FY25 increase of 8.0%. The five-year (FY23-FY27) annual average increase is 7.96%, and the ten-year (FY18-FY27) annual average increase is 6.9%. The FY26 residential tax rate will be $6.95 per thousand dollars of value, subject to Department of Revenue approval. This is an increase of $0.28, or approximately 4% from FY26. The commercial tax rate will be $16.99, which is an increase of $2.92, or 21% from FY25 (which follows a 22% rate increase the previous year).

“A major concern going forward is that if residential values increase and commercial values continue to decrease, the City could hit the ceiling for the property tax classification shift. Once the classification ceiling is reached, the residential class will bear all tax levy increases while this condition continues.”

As a result of the market activity in calendar year 2025, which is the basis of the FY27 property assessments, total residential property values increased by 2.3%. Total commercial property values decreased by 12.4%. These negative results reflect the continued softening of the commercial and lab markets.

By property class, an average a single-family home will see a 6.47% tax increase, a two-family will see a 8.24% increase, a three-family will see a 8.38% increase, and a condo will see a 0.71% decrease. Due to the flat residential exemption, condo owners will often see a decrease or only a very small increase in years when other property owners are hit with a significant increase. Here are the median figures including the CPA Surcharge:

FY2027 Taxes - including CPA Surcharge and Residential Exemption

History of changes in residential property taxes

Board Appointments:

Manager’s Agenda #1. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to appointments to the Climate Committee. [text of report]
Appointments Confirmed 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #3. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to appointments to the LGBTQ+ Commission. [text of report]
Appointments Confirmed 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #2. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to an Arts Council Leadership Announcement. [text of report]
Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #4. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $2,250,000 from the Water Fund Balance to fund the purchase of supplemental drinking water from the MWRA. [text of report]
Order Adopted 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #6. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to AR26-26 regarding harmonization of institutional bus protocols. [text of report]
Placed on File 9-0

Order #1. City Council opposition to H.R. 8870 and Increases in Federal Truck Size and Weight Limits.   Councillor McGovern, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Vice Mayor Azeem, Councillor Al-Zubi
Order Adopted 9-0

Order #4. That the City Council hold a Roundtable/Working Meeting on Mon, Nov 30, 2026, from 4:00-6:00pm, to discuss the future uses of City-owned properties.   Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Al-Zubi
Order Adopted 9-0

Order #6. That the City Manager is requested to report back to the City Council within thirty days on the status of the negotiations between the Cambridge School Committee and the Cambridge Education Association, in Executive Session if the Law Department advises that a report in open session would disclose collective bargaining strategy Support for Cambridge Public Schools paraprofessionals, substitutes, and clerks.   Councillor Al-Zubi, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler
pulled by Zusy; Siddiqui recuses herself; comments by Al-Zubi (wants to fund everything), Zusy (notes actual salary ranges, this is School Committee’s business and that proposals would add 18% to School Dept. budget, will vote No), Nolan (this is School Committee business and would step into middle of contract negotiations, district has proposed a 60% increase over 2 years of lowest paid paraprofessionals, wants School Committee to work within current budget, notes continuing mediocre MCAS results), Sobrinho-Wheeler (support any union no matter what), Flaherty (this is not just about supporting unions, but passing this would set a bad precedent), McGovern (calls this “a tough one”, but City Council has no line item authority with the School Department and its budget), Azeem (it would be fine if we spent extra, but this belongs with School Committee, Al-Zubi (claims there is no conflict of interest, wants confidential information on negotiations to be provided), Simmons (notes former School Committee members on Council and how the School Committee would resent City Council intervention in this matter - stay in our own lane), Zusy (clarifies pay ranges for paraprofessionals - average salary is more like $52,000, in line with neighboring communities); Motion Fails 2-4-1-2 (AAZ,JSW-Yes; BA,TF,PN,CZ-No; SS-Absent; MM,DS-Present)

Order #8. Postponing the roll out of the Outer Huron Bike Lanes from the Bicycle Safety Ordinance until we solve the parking problem.   Councillor Zusy, Councillor Simmons, Councillor Flaherty
pulled by Zusy; comments by Zusy, Flaherty, Simmons, Nolan, Azeem, Kathy Watkins, Al-Zubi, McGovern (w/substitute Order with Siddiqui), Siddiqui; Charter Right - Zusy

Charter Right #1. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the Cambridge Police Department and other relevant departments to develop a coordinated July 4th response plan for the Cherry Street, Harvard Street, and Fletcher Maynard Academy area to ensure that this spot not be utilized for the illegal use of fireworks. [Charter Right – Simmons, Sept 14, 2026]
comments by Simmons (opposes proposed amendments), Al-Zubi (withdraw previous amendment, introduce new amendment); previous amendment withdrawn 9-0; comments by Flaherty, Sobrinho-Wheeler, McGovern (fine w/original Order), Zusy (will vote for original Order, this is about enforcement and not social services), Siddiqui (would delete reference to Community Safety taking the lead), McGovern, Azeem; Amendment by Al-Zubi, Sobrinho-Wheeler Fail 4-3-0-2 (AAZ,PN,JSW,SS-Yes; MM,DS,CZ-No; BA,TF-Present); Original Order Adopted 7-2 (AAZ,JSW-Present); Reconsideration Fails 0-9

Resolution #3. Happy 102nd Birthday to Marvin Gilmore.   Councillor Simmons, Councillor Flaherty
pulled by Flaherty with story and to be added as sponsor; comments by Simmons

Committee Report #1. The Housing Committee and the Neighborhood and Long-Term Planning, Public Facilities, Arts and Celebration Committee held a public hearing on June 25, 2026 to continue discussion of the 2025 Multifamily Zoning Amendments and consider potential modifications. The Committees also reviewed PO26#123, relative to proposed amendments to the Multifamily Zoning Ordinance. The June 25, 2026 Committee meeting recessed and reconvened on Sept 16, 2026. At the Sept 16, 2026 meeting both Committees voted favorably to recommend to the full City Council adoption of the proposed Policy Order, as amended, requesting that the City Manager work with CDD and relevant City Departments to prepare zoning language based on the recommendations discussed at the Sept 16, 2026 joint Committee hearing. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 9-0; comments on proposed Order by McGovern, Nolan, Yi-An Huang, Melissa Peters (CDD), Zusy, Azeem (notes that 20% Inclusionary and other zoning changes are not producing the housing that was projected, especially with high interest rates and tariffs - OK with proposed amendments but make other future changes), Flaherty (suggests having a sunset provision), McGovern, Melissa Peters (will respond within 6-8 weeks); Order Adopted 9-0

Order #11. (proposed in Comm. Report #1) That the City Manager is requested to work with CDD and relevant City departments to prepare zoning language based on the recommendations discussed in the Sept 16, 2026 Joint Housing and Neighborhood and Long-Term Planning Committees for consideration by the full City Council.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Al-Zubi, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler
Order Adopted 9-0 (see Committee Report #1)

Comments?

Third arrest is made in the July 4 shooting death of Xavier Bautista (Cambridge Somerville Independent, Sept 22, 2026)

2nd Man Charged In Connection With Fatal Shooting Of Cambridge DPW Employee (Patch.com, Sept 17, 2026)

Globe article: Second suspect arrested for alleged role in July 4 slaying of Cambridge public works employee, officials say

For your consideration… - a letter from Patrick Barrett

Cambridge City Council
City of Cambridge
795 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Mayor Siddiqui and Honorable Cambridge City Council,

I am writing to you in my capacity as an advocate, long-time volunteer, multiple committee member, and at this point in my career too many Cambridge specific advocacy boards and initiatives to name. I am, of course, also a real estate developer.

In the coming weeks you will be discussing the renewal of the Mid-Cambridge Neighborhood Conservation District (MCNCD), amendments to the revolutionary Multifamily Housing Zoning ordinance which is currently slated to be examined and taught this Spring at both Harvard and MIT, and you will finally release the long overdue ¹ Inclusionary Zoning Nexus Study. I have been involved in enough discussions about “controversial” issues in Cambridge to know when the die has already been cast. This comes typically by way of concessions made during the mayoral shuffle at the beginning of any term or when we tip over the edge of any even year into the “danger zone” of the municipal election cycle. Rarely are these concessions in the best interests of Cambridge and even more rarely do the knee-jerk decisions based on misinformation campaigns or the fear inspired by a potential election loss ever produced a good outcome.

On June 8th I represented a client on a conversion project; we were adding a sizable addition to create 4 large format townhouse units from an existing smaller format three-unit building. An interesting twist in that case was that prior to our presentation another presentation was given by a sitting member of the Cambridge Historical Commission (CHC). His project, a down conversion of a three-unit building (in fairness the developer didn’t know if it was a 2 or 3) into a single-family home with an additional single-family home behind it. The existing property is pending at $3.5M. Aside from the clear conflict of interest that a sitting CHC member has with the MCNCD (CHC reviews all MCNCD appeals) what set this presentation apart was that it was approved unanimously with little conversation about the loss of housing and a bit of lip service to a 51” caliper tree on the abutting lot. When my case came up the first question asked of me by Commissioner Tice was “Are these units affordable?” – a ridiculous question that somehow never came up during the previous case. This was then followed by Commissioner Corstens asking me, the attorney advocate, directly, “What is your legacy?” – a bizarre question but similar to a question Councillor Zusy had asked me a while ago who also happened to be in the audience that evening. The chef’s kiss came in the form of Kyle Sheffield joining in, now announcing himself as a concerned citizen (and abutter), admonishing the project and calling me out directly for challenging the City’s unlawful and irrevocably broken Inclusionary Ordinance. Our case was rejected, no continuance, no further discussion. A City special employee attacking a litigant in a very publicized legal challenge could only be construed as an attempt to unduly sway a regulatory body or to intimidate or both. Our case was rejected and Cambridge lost at least three new units of much needed housing and gained two new $5+M homes. The MCNCD is by far the largest NCD in the city and according to the Cambridge Historical Commission, consists of approximately 2000 buildings and is roughly .35 square miles. It acts as a de-facto homeowner’s association displacing development to other less “protected” areas of the city. The MCNCD residents enjoy this “protection” at zero cost to themselves to the detriment and expense of everyone who cannot afford Mr. Sheffield’s bespoke $5M homes. That is the legacy of the MCNCD. That is why it should not be renewed.

On September 16th this Council will convene in the Sullivan Chamber to discuss the proposed pre-ordained changes to the Multifamily Housing Zoning ordinance wherein there is a 100% chance that the proposed changes and more, shared a few months ago, will be pushed forward to CDD for drafting. In doing so you will signal to all projects in the city and all prospective projects that Cambridge is essentially closed for business; pencils down until we know what the rules are. To date, not a single inclusionary housing project has been approved. While Councillor Flaherty can write op-ed’s ² about how the 2025 ordinance is “failing” all he really exposed was how little he knows about the development process in the City of Cambridge. It takes, at minimum, 12-18 months just to go from a schematic design to assemble a CDD-approved application to application approval before one can even get to permitting which will also take months, maybe even another year. Had anyone started a month before the ordinance was ordained, we would still be sitting in CDD’s waiting room; and we are. The frustration felt by the citizenry and through the Council are all the smaller projects that do not have to go through any process (nor should they). These projects stay below the “magic” numbers: 9,999, 11,999, and 24,999 – thresholds for inclusionary zoning, passive house, and small project review by the Cambridge Community Development Department. These projects tend to be in tight conditions and are difficult to execute but are necessary to upgrade and rebuild this city. However, the set of rules you have before you favor these smaller builds over larger ones and as a policy it is the antithesis of Article 1.30 and 19.30. You favored development in the middle of a block and not only penalized corners but made them almost undevelopable without a variance or special permit. Fortunately, the state acted and now what it means to get a variance is a whole new issue; one you ought to bring up on the 16th. However, nothing in the proposed changes fixes or even addresses it and the only suggestion I’ve heard so far would make the condition laughably worse. I could go on with examples, but this is why a knee jerk mob-ruled change will not address or even ameliorate the underlying issues legitimate complaints have pointed out. A working group of experts; developers large scale and small scale should be publicly consulted on any change before one is pushed forward on the 16th. We should not erase progress applauded in local and national press and by experts across the country because the change you have embraced makes people uncomfortable. We should not indulge “serial misinformationalists” ™ who have littered the airwaves with AI slop, misleading and overly dramatic Facebook posts, phony development lists, and who feel very comfortable doxxing homeowners simply because they fear change. Please vote to keep this in committee, convene a group of practitioners, and get it as close to right as possible. Maybe the Council should sit in at MIT and Harvard’s classes next Spring?

Lastly, the inclusionary report comes out at the end of this month and will definitely state that 20% inclusionary requirements work! It will further offer the Council a simple buffet of options that will largely be seen as unnecessary to the general population, each one more baffling than the next and begging the question; why? How do I know this? Because this is a pattern of behavior that those of us who pay attention have seen time and time again. It’s exactly what happened in 2016 that got us here in the first place. I fully understand that this is a highly political and ideologically driven issue but math is math. It isn’t, however, just the man with the wanted sign who is saying this. All you have to do is look at Chelsea, San Francisco, San Jose, Denver, Portland OR, Seattle, East Palo Alto, and Redwood City who have already significantly reduced their IZ requirements to see where this issue is headed. It’s national. It is why towns across the US are exploring ways to reduce. Where Cambridge sets itself apart, like Somerville and Boston (who also chose RKG) is that politically, reduction or elimination is just a non-starter. If you read RKG’s analysis of Somerville in 2025 you can literally see the consultants twisting themselves into knots on every page. Whether it’s their 23% operational costs for rental building (excluding tax) without a way to incorporate that number to get a real value or $67k land value per unit they associate with projects. They used two different feasibility bars and used them inconsistently, that $67k land cost was applied to all five districts but rent varied by subarea, their downstream scenarios all modeled after Subarea 3, all inputs were interview-sourced without disclosure “for-profit developers,” and the smallest most adversely affected project size was never tested. If you use enough sliders and pick the data you like, everything works. They, like Rosen before them, cherry pick best case conditions for large and small development and present them as a cohesive metric for underwriting real estate development. I just wanted to get it on record this time, (I missed the chance in 2016 though Cambridge Day has a few choice comments), that this report is nonsense like the one’s RKG has produced in the past which has left Boston and Somerville scrambling ³ and politically trapped by their own nonsense RKG “study.” Maybe there is a better way? ⁴

Respectfully,
Patrick W. Barrett III

Footnotes:

1   11.203.2 Inclusionary Housing Requirement.
(c) The City shall initiate a reevaluation of the Inclusionary Housing Requirement at an interval of no more than five (5) years from the time the Inclusionary Housing Requirement was last amended. Such reevaluation shall include a report provided to the City Council reviewing factors such as changes in demographic characteristics and residential development activity, housing trends measured in terms of, but not limited to, vacancy rates, production statistics, prices for dwelling units, and affordability, and the relationship between Inclusionary Housing Projects and all housing in Cambridge. The Community Development Department shall also conduct an annual review and report on the Inclusionary Housing Program.

2   It Didn’t Work - by Councilor Flaherty

3   Not going so well

4   A better way

Comments?

Editor’s Note: Though I agree with many of Mr. Barrett’s concerns, I do want to make clear that I emphatically do not agree with his recommendations regarding renewal of the Mid-Cambridge Neighborhood Conservation District. NCDs are simply tools designed to produce better outcomes. Any tool can be used improperly, but this does not invalidate the usefulness of the tool. - RW

Cambridge Seeking Community Members for New Commission Vacancies

Aug 25, 2026 (updated Sept 21) – Serving on a City of Cambridge board, commission or committee can be a rewarding experience and an excellent way to contribute to our community. Members have the opportunity to participate in the City’s decision-making process across a variety of topics.

The City of Cambridge is currently seeking to fill vacancies on the Commission for Persons with Disabilities Advisory Board and the Planning Board. The deadline to apply is Monday, September 21.

Apply today at Cambridgema.gov/apply. A cover letter and resume or applicable experience can be submitted during the online application process. If you have questions about the application process or need assistance, please contact the City Manager's Office at 617-349-4300 or boardsandcommissions@cambridgema.gov.

Below is more detailed information on each of the current vacancies:

Commission for Persons with Disabilities Advisory Board (Application Deadline: September 21)
The CCPD Advisory Board works to increase access to all aspects of Cambridge community life for people with disabilities. The Commission raises awareness about disability issues and promotes equal opportunities for people with a range of abilities, including physical, mental, and sensory. CCPD also provides information, referrals, guidance, and technical assistance to individuals and their families, employers, public agencies, businesses and private non-profit organizations. CCPD Advisory Board members work with other board members and office staff to carry out the CCPD Ordinance (Cambridge Municipal Code Chapter 2.96).

The CCPD Advisory Board, which has 11 members who serve as volunteers for three-year terms, currently meets virtually on the second Thursday of every month at 5:30pm. Members must attend monthly meetings and also take part in Working Groups and work on projects as needed.

If interested applicants have questions or require more information, please contact  CCPD@cambridgema.gov, call 617-349-4692 (voice), or 711 (relay).

Planning Board (Application Deadline: September 21)
The Planning Board is a group of Cambridge residents who make recommendations and decisions about urban development on behalf of the City of Cambridge. The Planning Board meets regularly in a public forum to discuss the City’s urban planning objectives, and apply them in the following ways:

• Reviewing major urban development proposals, granting certain types of Special Permits when they are needed, and putting conditions on Special Permit approval. The Planning Board reviews about 20-25 Special Permit cases each year;
• Reviewing proposed amendments to the Cambridge Zoning Ordinance, which sets rules for urban development, and making recommendations to the City Council. The Planning Board reviews about 10-15 proposed zoning amendments each year;
• Making recommendations to the Board of Zoning Appeal (BZA) on some cases. The BZA is a different board that grants some Special Permits and variances;
• Discussing other City of Cambridge planning efforts.

The Planning Board, which has 10 members who serve as volunteers for five-year terms, typically meets one-two times in the evening every month virtually or in a hybrid format.

If interested applicants have questions or require more information, please contact Swaathi Joseph in the Community Development Department at 617-349-4668, email sjoseph@cambridgema.gov or visit www.cambridgema.gov/planningboard.

Volunteer Opportunities - Cambridge Boards & Commissions (click for details)

Commission for Persons with Disabilities Advisory Board (Application Deadline: September 21, but apparently still open)

Planning Board (Application Deadline: September 21, but apparently still open)

November 2026 Ballot Questions

You are likely aware that we may have as many as 11 9 ballot questions this coming November. Here’s the list (borrowed from Boston Globe):

Just in case you were interested…

The City Clerks and City Managers of Cambridge (includes recent Managers’ contracts)

The Mayors of Cambridge since 1846

Plan E Cambridge City Councils - At A Glance (Mayor in bold)

Plan E Cambridge School Committees (and Mayors) At A Glance

Stories from the Archives: The History of Voting in Cambridge for African Americans and Women
hosted and written by Alyssa Pacy, Archivist at the Cambridge Public Library; produced by Peter Levine, CCTV

The Cambridge City Charter: From Town Meeting to Plan E (premiered May 15, 2023 on CCTV Channel 9)

A chronology of the 1972 conflict over Proportional Representation in Cambridge (posted Feb 24, 2023)

Plan E Cambridge City Councils - At A Glance (Mayor in bold) — Comments?

Plan E Cambridge School Committees (and Mayors) At A Glance — Comments?

In case you were wondering about how to make Cambridge’s PR elections independent of how the ballots are counted…
Election Method Comparison – STV/Cincinnati vs. Fractional Transfer – 2021 Cambridge City Council Election (posted Jan 15, 2022)

Featured recent stories in the Cambridge Chronicle (the paper of record) - with some comments:

If you would like to subscribe or pick up a free paper copy at various sites, I encourage you to do so. It really is The Paper of Record - even if it is currently understaffed and in need of rejuvenation. What we really need is a summit meeting of all Cambridge news providers, including CCTV and Cambridge Municipal TV, to figure out a long-term plan. We absolute need to get Gannett to the table to talk about any long-term plans they may have and if and when the Cambridge Chronicle might be restored to its former role (dating back to 1846) as an essential source for news and features about Cambridge (as opposed to regional feeds of little or no relevance to the people of Cambridge).

A new food hall is coming to the Cambridge mall. Here’s what restaurants it will have (Oct 22, 2024)

Head of the Charles Regatta weekend rowing event in Cambridge (Oct 18, 2024)

Poll tests statewide support for MBTA Communities Act. Its results may surprise (Sept 26, 2024)

Harmful bacteria found in the Charles River? Here’s what to know. (Sept 24, 2024)

Voter’s guide: How to vote early in Massachusetts. What you need to know (Sept 22, 2024)

Julie Wormser starts Oct. 1 as Cambridge’s first chief climate officer (Sept 18, 2024)

Decker beats MacKay in Democratic primary recount for State House seat (Sept 13, 2024)

Recount Sept. 12 between Democrats contending for Cambridge state rep (Sept 12, 2024)

Cambridge state representative race may require a recount (Sept 4, 2024)

Massachusetts Ballot Questions 2024: MCAS, medical psychedelics, more (Sept 4, 2024)

Porter Square Books plans move to larger space in Cambridge (Aug 27, 2024)

Cambridge Brewing Company announces closure. Here’s are the details (Aug 20, 2024)

Cambridge artist Elizabeth Rawls spends her retirement free motion quilting (Aug 14, 2024)

Who were Cambridge’s 25 top paid municipal employees in 2023? We have a list (May 23, 2024)

Cambridge city, school employee salaries for 2023: Searchable Database

HOW TO BREAK A POLITICAL MACHINE

pictures added Mar 27, 2021 scanned from original magazine
[Collier’s Magazine, January 31, 1948]
Comments?

THE MUNICIPAL SITUATION IN CAMBRIDGE

A Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the National Municipal League at Chicago, April 28, 1904
by Henry N. Wheeler, President of the League
preceded by a Program of the Work of the League for 1904
[original PDF]

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes on CCJ Forum

Cambridge InsideOut currently airs every first and third Tuesday at 6:00pm and 6:30pm with producer/host Robert Winters. We may have other guest hosts as well. All shows are posted on YouTube after broadcast.

[complete list of shows - with links to YouTube videos (and now audio too!)]

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 675-676: Sept 15, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 673-674: Aug 18, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 671-672: July 21, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 669-670: June 16, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 667-668: May 19, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 665-666: Apr 21, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 663-664: Mar 17, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 661-662: Feb 17, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 659-660: Jan 20, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 657-658: Jan 6, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 63 and 64 with Glenn Koocher
We had a great time doing these shows with the man who invented the original Cambridge InsideOut - Glenn Koocher.

Cambridge InsideOut on CCTV during 2013-2014 featured co-hosts Susana Segat and Robert Winters.
Cambridge InsideOut on CCTV during 2015-2022 featured co-hosts Judy Nathans and Robert Winters.
Cambridge InsideOut on CCTV during 2022-2023 featured co-hosts Patrick Barrett (sometimes) and Robert Winters.

History - Kendall Square and the Cambridge Redevelopment Authority

MBTA Role in Cambridge Center Project – Kendall Station Urban Initiatives Project, 1979-1989 (Feb 13, 2014 by Thad Tercyak)

Kendall Square Urban Renewal Project: Six Pivotal Episodes (June 8, 2013 by Thad Tercyak)

Kendall Square Urban Renewal Project, Initial Years, 1963 to 1982 (July 12, 2012 by Thad Tercyak)

Kendall Square Urban Renewal Area – Cambridge Redevelopment Authority (Apr 5, 2012)

Open for Comments - CCJ Forum

List of all CCJ Forum posts (2009 – present) – reverse chronologically with author’s name (originally Aug 14, 2022 - updated automatically)

Hexus Nexus – October 5, 2026 Cambridge City Council meeting (posted Oct 3, 2026)

The Taxman Cometh – September 28, 2026 Cambridge City Council meeting (posted Sept 26, 2028, updated Sept 29)

Current City of Cambridge Board and Commission Vacancies (updated Sept 21, 2026)

The Return – September 14, 2026 Cambridge City Council meeting (posted Sept 14, 2026)

For your consideration… (posted Sept 14, 2026 by Patrick Barrett)

Cambridge Open Archives in 2026 (posted Aug 25, 2026)

Coming Soon to a Theater Near You – August 3, 2026 Midsummer Cambridge City Council meeting (posted Aug 1, 2026; updated Aug 4)

July 23, 2026 Special City Council meeting in response to the murder of Xavier Bautista (posted July 23, 2026)

Man shot to death in Cambridge – Broadway and Norfolk St. (posted July 4, 2026)

Last Call – June 22, 2026 Cambridge City Council meeting (posted June 20, 2026; updated July 21)

Tripling Down – June 8, 2026 Cambridge City Council meeting (posted June 6, 2026; updated June 8)

Doubling Down – June 1, 2026 Cambridge City Council meeting (posted June 1, 2026; updated June 4)

Cambridge City Council Committee Assignments: 2026-2027 (posted Jan 9, 2026)

Cambridge Municipal Election – Voter Turnout: 2023 to 2025 (posted Dec 15, 2025)

Cambridge 2025 Municipal Election – Campaign Finance Reports (posted Nov 4, 2025; updated Jan 6)

2025 Cambridge Final Election Results (and some curiosities) (posted Nov 16, 2025)

The Proposed Cambridge City Charter (posted Oct 31, 2025)

Campaign Tales – August 31 (posted Aug 31, 2025)

Emerging and Converging Political Factions (posted Aug 18, 2025)

Follow-Up Memo on Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance Concerns Under MBTA Communities Act Compliance (posted June 14, 2025)

Random Observations (June 3, 2025)

Urgent Legal and Policy Concerns Regarding Cambridge’s Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (by Patrick Barrett, posted May 2, 2025)

Plan E Cambridge School Committees (and Mayors) At A Glance (originally posted Jan 21, 2022, updated Jan 1, 2024)

Plan E Cambridge City Councils At A Glance (originally posted Jan 21, 2022, updated Jan 1, 2024)

Municipal Election Voting Comparison: 2021 vs. 2023 (and then some) (posted Dec 16, 2023)

Voter Success and Number of Candidates – Cambridge Municipal Elections (updated Nov 26, 2023)

Alice Wolf: 1933-2023 (posted Jan 28, 2023)

Completing the Square [originally posted June 11, 2013]

On Love and Elections (Dec 26, 2022 by David Goode)

Sheila Doyle Russell – City Councillor, Mayor, and Friend (posted Dec 13, 2022)

ADDRESS OF THE MAYOR UPON THE FIRST ORGANIZATION OF THE CITY GOVERNMENT – 1846 (posted Dec 11, 2022)

HISTORY OF CAMBRIDGE – Rev. Lucius Paige, 1877 – INDIAN HISTORY (posted Nov 25, 2022)

Election Method Comparison – STV/Cincinnati vs. Fractional Transfer – 2021 Cambridge City Council Election (posted Jan 15, 2022)

A few observations on density (posted Feb 16, 2021)

The Advent of PR in Cambridge (Nov 10, 2013)

Completing the Square (June 11, 2013)

On becoming a True Cantabrigian (Dec 29, 2012 by Glenn Koocher)

The Neverending Study of Central Square

Aug 11, 2012 - While preparing to write a series of essays on Central Square, I put together the following list of Central Square studies culled from a variety of sources. I have originals for most of these. If you know of any others, please let me know. - Robert Winters

Feb 1980 - CDD report entitled “Central Square - Commercial Area Revitalization District”

June 1980 - CDD booklet entitled “Facade Improvements” with focus on Central Square

Apr 1983 - “Central Square Report” produced by City Council’s Central Square Subcommittee (study began in 1980 or 1981)

1987 - A report produced in 1987 about a Subcommittee that allegedly built on the 1983 report (may be same as Central Square Action Plan)

Nov 1987 - Central Square Action Plan

1989 - Draft Central Square Development Guidelines

May 1993 - Results of the “Mayor’s Forum on Central Square”

Oct 1993 - Report by the Committee to Promote and Enhance Central Square Now!

Aug 1994 - A Study of the Visual Images and Signage of Central Square (CDD)

May 1995 - Central Square Improvements Project, Master Plan Report

May 1995 - An Urban Design Plan for Central Square (executive summary)

May 2001 - Summary Notes from “A Conversation about Central Square”

Feb 2000 - The Gibbs Report, Central Square Commercial Market Study - Executive Summary (June 30, 1999)

Oct 2004 - Central Square, Cambridge - Rising Fortunes at a Regional Crossroads (Rekha Murthy)

Dec 2004 - Reviving a Traditional City - Central Square, Cambridge, gets a facelift (Rekha Murthy)

June 2005 - Street Media: Ambient Messages in an Urban Space - a photographic analysis of Central Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rekha Murthy)

2009 - CDD Central Square Customer Intercept Survey Report

2011 - Central Square Market Profile

2011 - Red Ribbon Commission Study Report

2012 - Goody/Clancy report and recommendations

2013 - K2C2 Final Reports (Dec 30, 2013)
The final reports for Kendall Square and Central Square are now available for download. Zoning discussions based on the recommendations of the K2 and C2 Advisory Committees, which are encapsulated in these reports, will continue in 2014.

Kendall Square Central Square Planning Study (K2C2)

Central Square Final Report 2013 Part 1, December 2013 (K2C2)

Central Square Final Report 2013 Part 2, December 2013 (K2C2)

Kendall Square Final Report 2013 Part 1, December 2013 (K2C2)

Kendall Square Final Report 2013 Part 2, December 2013 (K2C2)

This comprehensive planning effort guided by stakeholder advisory committees, City staff, and a team of multidisciplinary consultants led by Goody Clancy, developed a vision and master plan for Central Square, Kendall Square, and the area South of Main Street (including the Osborn Triangle) connecting the two squares. Both final reports are divided into two parts; in each case you will need to review both parts to read the entire report.

2024 - Central Square City Lots Study

FYI - Current Rules and Goals: Cambridge City Council & Cambridge School Committee

City Council Rules 2026-2027 (provisionally adopted Jan 5, 2026; amended June 1, 2026)

City Council Values Statement and Priority Areas: 2026-2027 (adopted Feb 9, 2026)

City Council Rules 2024-2025 (as amended Mar 25, 2024)

City Council Rules 2022-2023 (as amended Nov 21, 2022)

City Council Rules 2020-2021 (as amended Oct 26, 2020)

City Council Rules 2018-2019 (adopted January 29, 2018; provisionally adopted for 2020-2021 term on Jan 6, 2020)

City Council Rules 2016-2017

City Council Rules 2014-2015 (adopted January 7, 2014, amended Feb 10, 2014 to reflect revised Council committees)

City Council Goals - FY2018 (current, adopted Oct 16, 2017)

City Council Goals - FY2012-2013 (adopted Dec 13, 2011)

City Council Committees (for the current term)

School Committee Rules (Adopted January 1, 2018; Revised June 19, 2018)

School Committee Rules (adopted January 7, 2008)    School Committee Goals (adopted October 7, 2008)

Civic Infrastructure - 2009

June 7, 2009 - Once upon a time there was a civic organization in Cambridge known as the Cambridge Civic Association (CCA). It was formed in 1945 out of several organizations that had been existed through the 1930s and that had lobbied the state legislature to create the Plan E Charter option (1938) which featured a city manager form of government and proportional representation elections for city council and school committee. These reforms were central to model charter reform movements active in the United States from the early 1900s. The central theme of the CCA in its early days was “good government” in the sense of being anti-patronage and for professionally managed local government. This changed with the introduction of rent control at the end of the 1960s after which the CCA shifted leftward and became permanently lashed to the mast of the rent control vessel. Though the CCA still exists on paper (I believe), it rapidly declined after the statewide abolition of rent control (late 1994) and essentially disappeared a decade later (early 2005).

I bring up the ghost of the CCA today only to point out that when it was created it had some very admirable goals. Here’s the original Mission Statement of the CCA:

Purposes: This association is formed for the following purposes:

1. To promote businesslike, honest, and efficient conduct of local government, open to public scrutiny.
2. To induce residents to take an active interest in the affairs of the City of Cambridge.
3. To encourage and support the candidacy of men and women seeking election to public office and to support intelligent, wholesome leadership in public affairs.
4. To assure that the best qualified persons are appointed to positions in the City government after consideration of all qualified candidates.
5. To promote among the citizens of Cambridge equitable distribution and benefit of public services and equal opportunity for economic security, education, and social advancement.

These are pretty good founding principles for a civic organization and I’m tempted to say that some should be incorporated into the recently adopted City Council’s Goals for FY2010 (adopted Feb 2, 2009). In fact, of the 22 current goals, the only one that comes close is: “An increased level of recruitment and opportunities for membership on boards and commissions.” The current Council goals emphasize things like “fostering community” via block parties and such, though one has to wonder if the City should be promoting these activities or just getting out of the way so that people can foster community on their own. The goals also seem to put some emphasis on developing “successful nightlife campaigns” while mentioning nothing about promoting ordinary “daytime” economic activity that supports the everyday needs of residents.

One founding principle of the CCA that fell into disuse over the years is listed above as #3: To encourage and support the candidacy of men and women seeking election to public office and to support intelligent, wholesome leadership in public affairs. Indeed, I can personally testify to the fact that in its dying years the only reason the CCA made endorsements at all was because the CCA-endorsed incumbents wanted the benefit of having an advertised CCA slate of candidates that would help secure their reelection. There was precious little effort to recruit new candidates or to support them. Today, the benefits of incumbency are greater than ever. The cost of political campaigns have become absurdly high and most of the incumbents now have (City paid) staff who are inevitably political appointees who directly or indirectly assist in the reelection efforts of their bosses. The deck is increasingly stacked against challengers. Furthermore, the salary and benefits for elected councillors are now so sweet that it is unlikely that any of them would ever want to move on to another job.

With this background in mind, I would like to encourage all Cambridge residents to help level the playing field by finding out about this year’s challengers for seats on the Cambridge City Council and the Cambridge School Committee. This is not meant as a dig against any particular incumbent as much as an appeal to support the challengers in what is a difficult and laudable effort. Please see the Cambridge Candidate Pages for the current list of expected candidates. Then use your own judgment - don’t expect me or anyone else to do it for you.

Speaking of this year’s municipal election, there are some activists who are now expending great effort to attack the City Manager and most of the current City Council. That is not nor has it ever been the intention of the Cambridge Civic Journal or its editor. Candidates are now being seduced by financial promises from one angry fellow with a Brattle Street address and a basketful of grudges. Former CCA Executive Board members from its darkest and most manipulative days are oozing up from the civic swamp trying to at last make good on their failed campaigns of the early 1990s to oust city manager Bob Healy.

It’s entertaining to watch people who have primarily earned disrespect in their civic efforts try to capitalize on the recent Monteiro jury decision as a means of realizing their decades-old vendettas. Conveniently forgotten in their recent letters to Cambridge’s “oldest weekly newspaper” are the many achievements of City Manager Bob Healy, the strong financial position of the City, and the recent 8-1 vote of confidence bestowed upon Mr. Healy in granting him a three year contract extension. Also missing in this testimony is the fact that virtually all affirmative action in the hiring of employees and department heads has taken place on Mr. Healy’s watch. These letters also fail to divulge how long these writers have been carrying their jealousy and anger toward Mr. Healy for actually orchestrating progress in Cambridge while the best they could ever do is snipe from the sidelines. - Robert Winters

Selected City of Cambridge References:

Cambridge City Charter (as adopted Nov 4, 2025)

Plan E Charter (Cambridge’s now former city charter - but the basic structure remains)

Acts of 1921, Chapter 239 as amended (establishment of Cambridge Election Commission)

Mass. General Laws Chapter 54A (governing Cambridge’s PR elections)

Pen Portraits of Prominent People - by Henry J. Mahoney Editor, Cambridge Sentinel - 1923

This book was published c. 1923 and features very witty one-page “pen portraits” (with photo) of prominent Cantabrigians of the day. I’ll be adding names alphabetically as time permits. There are 182 portraits in the book.

It comes to mind that there may be some value in expanding these profiles to other prominent Cantabrigians who arrived on the scene after 1923, including prominent Cantabrigians of today. With this in mind, I extend the invitation to any and all who may wish to contribute their own “pen portraits” of Cambridge people. Contributions do not necessarily have to be in the style of Mr. Mahoney. Inclusion is, as always, subject to the erratic discretion of the editor.

Special thanks to Karen Welch for sending me the book. - RW

Political History of Cambridge in the 20th Century - by Glenn Koocher (Nov 2004); edited by Robert Winters (July 2006)
[An alternate edit of this essay appeared, along with many other valuable essays, in a centennial volume to be published by the Cambridge Historical Society in 2007.]

Which People’s Republic - by Bill Cunningham (1999)

Subscribe to the Cambridge Civic Journal.
Specify in your message whether you wish to receive each new e-mail version or if you wish to be notified when the online versions are available at this web site. Under no circumstances will the subscription list be made available to any third party.

“The Number One thing I would emphasize is that journalists and bloggers would do well to see themselves as partners in the provision of information and that each can benefit greatly from the other. I’ve never seen this as a competition. It is especially true these days that local papers and young journalists are not very well-versed in the communities they serve. Much of the institutional memory has either died out or been bought out.” – Robert Winters, mathematician and creator of the Cambridge Civic Journal, an online publication about Cambridge, MA (rwinters.com)