Cambridge InsideOut - Oct 4, 2022

Possible Topics:Robert and Patrick

1) Remembering newspaperman Jack Thomas

2) Growing a Government - for Better or Worse: October 3, 2022 Cambridge City Council meeting

3) Sloppy Seconds - September 19, 2022 Cambridge City Council Agenda

4) Charter Review Committee and Cambridge City Charter Study Group

5) The Middle East and the Future of Central Square

6) Linkage (Incentive Zoning)

7) Covid Updates

8) Catching Up on the (Official) Cambridge News

9) Stories in the Cambridge Chronicle

10) Civic Calendar


Jack Thomas, journalist who poignantly wrote of his terminal diagnosis, dies at 83 (Oct 3, 2022, Boston Globe)

I just learned I only have months to live. This is what I want to say.
I’ve been a journalist for more than 60 years. So after doctors delivered the news, I sat down to do what came naturally, if painfully: Write this story. (Jack Thomas, July 21, 2021, Boston Globe)

Growing a Government - for Better or Worse: October 3, 2022 Cambridge City Council meeting

Here are a few items that warrant further comment this week:Fat City Hall

Manager’s Agenda #4. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to an update on new positions. [responds to Awaiting Report Items 22-37 and 22-40]
pulled by Carlone; Placed on File 9-0

Here come the “Chief People Officer”, the “Talent Officer”, the Director of Community Engagement, and the Director of Emergency Management. I’m not quite sure what to make of the first three of these new positions.


The Linkage Question

Manager’s Agenda #5. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 22-62, regarding requests for a legal opinion and additional analysis on linkage fee rate increase discussion.
pulled by Carlone along with Mgr #6, Mgr #7, Unf. Business #4, Comm. & Reports #1; McGovern amendment adopted 9-0; Referred to Petition

Manager’s Agenda #6. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a Planning Board report with a recommendation not to adopt the Incentive Zoning Rate Increase Petition.
pulled by McGovern; Referred to Petition 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #7. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a communication received from the Cambridge Affordable Housing Trust regarding the Incentive Zoning amendment.
pulled by McGovern; Referred to Petition 9-0

Unfinished Business #4. Section 11.202(b) of Article 11.000 Special Regulations linkage fee., be amended by substitution. (Ordinance #2022-14). [Passed to 2nd Reading Sept 12, 2022; To Be Ordained on or after Oct 3, 2022]
Removed for discussion and amendment, returned to Unfinished Business

Communications & Reports #1. A communication was received from Councillor Marc McGovern, transmitting a proposed amendment to the linkage fee.
McGovern amendment adopted 9-0; Referred to Petition

Late Order #12. That the City Manager direct the Community Development and the Law Department to review the amendment that states that exclusing the first 30,000 sq ft for buildings less that 60,000 sq ftin total size and sharing feedback, and report back to the City Council by the regular City Council meeting on Mon, Oct 17.   Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor McGovern, Councillor Zondevan, Councillor Azeem
Order Adopted 8-0-0-1 (Carlone - PRESENT)

We’ll see how this goes, but it will be very disappointing if this all comes down to just maximizing revenue generation without regard to any other incentives or unintended consequences.


Taxation without Representation

Manager’s Agenda #1 (Tax Rate Hearing). A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to votes necessary to seek approval from the Massachusetts Department of Revenue of the tax rate for FY2023. [Tax Rate Orders] [Tax Rate Letter]

The bottom line is that: the FY23 Adopted Operating Budget increased by 6.5% over the FY22 Adjusted Budget. The June 2022 FY23 Adopted Budget projected a property tax levy increase of $41.5 million, or 8.4%, to $536.3 million in order to fund operating and capital expenditures. This included the use of $13 million from Free Cash. With approval of the recommendations, the actual FY23 tax levy required to support the FY23 Budget is $531,600,922 - an increase of $36.9 million or 7.45% from FY22. This increase is lower than the estimated increase of 8.4% projected in the June 2022 Adopted Budget due in large part from higher than projected state aid and the use of reserve funds to lower the required tax levy. The property tax levy increase of 7.45% is above the FY22 increase of 4.7%. The property tax levy increase is also above the five-year (FY19-FY23) annual average increase of 6.44%, and the ten-year (FY14-FY23) annual average increase of 5.31%. Based on a revised property tax levy of $531,600,922 the FY23 residential tax rate will be $5.86 per thousand dollars of value, subject to Department of Revenue approval. This is a decrease of $0.06, or 1% from FY22. The commercial tax rate will be $10.38, which is a decrease of $0.85, or 7.6% from FY22. By property class, on average a single-family home will see a 6.6% tax increase, a condo will see a 6.5% decrease, a two-family will see a 4.7% increase, and a three-family will see a 5.4% increase.

Required Votes:
• Authorize $19,000,000 in Free Cash to Reduce the FY23 Tax Levy. [Adopted 8-1, QZ - NO]
• Transfer of Excess Overlay Balances. [Adopted 8-1, QZ - NO]
• Classify Property and Establish Minimum Residential Factor. [Adopted 9-0]
• Residential Exemptions. [Adopted 9-0]


Charter Right #1. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Community Development Department to convene a North Massachusetts Avenue Corridor District Zoning Proposal Working Group Policy Order Proposing a North Massachusetts Avenue (NMA) Corridor Working Group for the purpose of developing comprehensive zoning recommendations. [Charter Right – Azeem, Sept 19, 2022]
Withdrawn by Councillor Toner in favor of new Policy Order #3 (yet the required vote for unanimous consent was NOT taken)

Order #3. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Community Development Department to convene a North Massachusetts Avenue Corridor District Zoning Proposal Working Group by June 15, 2023.   Councillor Toner, Councillor Carlone, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Nolan
pulled by Toner; Order Adopted 9-0

To repeat what I said from the previous meeting: “This is a very promising Order. I will note, however, that unlike the days of yore when CDD would study and process things to death before coming to any conclusions, they often now arrive with conclusions and simply run interference during any subsequent public process. Let’s hope this time is different.”


Wild in the Streets

Charter Right #2. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Traffic, Transportation and Parking Department to convene a series of meetings with the Vision Zero, Pedestrian Committee, Bicycle Committee, the newly appointed Bicycling Advisory Committee, Cambridge Police Department, and any other departments deemed necessary, to review and revise the Cambridge Street Code. [Charter Right – Simmons, Sept 19, 2022]
Withdrawn by Councillor Toner in favor of new Policy Order (yet the required vote for unanimous consent was NOT taken)

Order #2. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Traffic, Parking, and Transportation Department to meet with and receive input from the Vision Zero, Pedestrian, Bicycle Committee, the Council on Aging, the Transit Advisory Committee, the Commission for Persons with Disabilities Advisory Board, Cambridge Police Department, and any other departments, to review and revise the Cambridge Street Code, promulgate the updated guide throughout the city, and develop recommendations for staffing and methods of improving traffic enforcement.   Councillor Toner, Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor Simmons, Councillor McGovern
pulled by Toner; Charter Right - Zondervan

It is noteworthy that at the previous meeting a number of prominent members of the bicycle lobby took issue with the idea of updating the Cambridge Street Code, and at least two councillors carried their water. Go figure.


On the Table #3. That the City Council refer the zoning petition regarding lab use to the Ordinance Committee and Planning Board for a hearing and report. [Tabled Sept 19, 2022]
Removed from Table by Toner 8-1 (QZ - NO); Amended by Toner, Mallon; Amendment Adopted 8-1 (BA - NO); Order Adopted as Amended 8-1 (QZ - NO); Referred to Economic Development and University Relations Committee and the Neighborhood & Long-Term Planning, Public Facilities, Arts and Celebrations Committee for a review and discussion

Unfinished Business #5. Transmitting Communication from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of appropriation and authorization to borrow $4,500,000 to provide funds for the design and construction of building renovations to the vacant City owned property at 105 Windsor Street. [Passed to 2nd Reading Sept 12, 2022; To Be Ordained on or after Oct 3, 2022]
pulled by Zondervan; Order Adopted 9-0

Unfinished Business #7. That the City Council schedule a hearing of the Ordinance Committee for the purposes of amending the Ordinance #2022-3 Wage Theft of the City of Cambridge to insert the language. [Passed to 2nd Reading Sept 19, 2022; To Be Ordained on or after Oct 3, 2022]
pulled by Zondervan; Ordained 9-0

Resolution #18. Happy 80th Birthday wishes to Bill Cunningham.   Councillor Zondervan

Happy birthday, Bill - even though we’ll probably never agree on a lot of things.


BEUDO Communications

Communications #31. A communication was received from Patrick W. Barrett III, regarding BEUDO Meeting Recap.

Communications #40. A communication was received from Nancy E. Donohue, Director of Government and Community Relations, Cambridge Chamber of Commerce regarding joint Business/Institutional BEUDO letter. [Joint Business/Institutional BEUDO letter] [BEUDO April 2022 letter] [BEUDO questions from 9-15-22] [BEUDO Amendment Requirements]

The “conversation” continues in spite of the tin ears of some councillors.


Time of the Season

Order #1. That the City Manager is requested to convene an advisory group to determine ways in which the City can work to lift up the voices and experiences of the descendants of the Indigenous People who currently reside in our community.   Councillor Simmons, Councillor Azeem, Councillor McGovern, Councillor Toner, Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Carlone, Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Zondervan
pulled by Simmons; Adopted 8-1 as Amended (Carlone - ABSENT)

Order #5. That the City Manager is requested to direct the appropriate City staff to affix the Indigenous Peoples’ Day Banner above JFK Street and Mount Auburn Street beginning on Oct 4, 2022, for no less than one week and recognize Indigenous Peoples’ Day on Oct 10, 2022.   Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Zondervan, Councillor Carlone, Councillor Azeem, Councillor McGovern, Councillor Nolan
pulled by McGovern; Adopted as Amended 9-0

At the same time, let’s give a hearty shout-out to all of the immigrants from other continents and their descendants who have contributed so much to this country and the world.


Order #7. That the City Manager is requested to work with the Law Department to automatically provide an initial legal opinion to the City Council and the City Clerk at least three business days in advance of the first Public Hearing on any amendment to the Code of Ordinances formally introduced in the City Council.   Councillor Zondervan, Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor McGovern
Order Adopted 9-0

Order #8. Amendment to section 22.25.1(c) of Article 22, entitled Sustainable Design and Development.   Councillor Zondervan
pulled by Zondervan; Referred to Planning Board & Ordinance Committee 9-0

Committee Report #5. On Sept 21, 2022, at 5:30pm, the Ordinance Committee, Chaired by Councillor McGovern, continued the Public Hearing on Ordinance #2022-5 that would eliminate parking minimums. This ordinance was originally proposed under POR 2022 #19. Councillor Zondervan made a motion that was approved by the Committee to amend the petition by substitution so that it adds the sentence underlined and in red below to section 6.30, and that this be the entirety of the petition. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 9-0; Passed to 2nd Reading as Amended (by Toner) 8-1 (Carlone - NO)

I do want to point out that one can support eliminating parking minimums in many circumstances while still acknowledging their value in other circumstances. Treating this as yet another ideological mandate is not helpful, but I suppose that’s where we’re at these days. - Robert Winters

Comments?

Sloppy Seconds - September 19, 2022 Cambridge City Council Agenda

Last week was the first City Council meeting for newly minted City Manager Yi-An Huang, and he’ll be back for seconds this week. Here’s a sampler from this week’s buffet:City Hall

Manager’s Agenda #3. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Council Order No. O-13 of 9/12/22, regarding a report on a legal opinion on the following questions regarding Policy Order #11 (proposed amendments to the Cannabis Business Permitting Ordinance) from the Sept 12, 2022 City Council meeting. [City Solicitor response]
pulled by Toner; Charter Right #3 brought forward 9-0 (the next time Mayor Siddiqui says “charterwritten” I may scream); Placed on File 9-0

Charter Right #3. That the Ordinances of the City of Cambridge be amended as it relates to Permitting Preferences for Priority Applicants. [Charter Right - Toner, Sept 12, 2022]
pulled by Toner; Council must declare an “emergency affecting the health and safety of the people of or their property” to justify rushing this amendment to a vote without going through passing to a 2nd Reading and waiting the requisite time prior to a vote; Emergency declared 9-0; Ordinance Amendment Adopted 9-0; Reconsideration Fails 0-9

As I said last week: There comes a point when repeated efforts to prop up and give advantages to certain cannabis operators becomes indistinguishable from political patronage. We have reached that point.


Charter Right #2. That the City Council refer the zoning petition regarding lab use to the Ordinance Committee and Planning Board for a hearing and report. [Charter Right - Toner, Sept 12, 2022]
Mayor Siddiqui again says “charterwritten”, Toner offers amendments but Zondervan is not interested; McGovern proposes sending Toner proposed amendments along with petition to Planning Board and Ordinance Committee, but this is not permissible; McGovern proposes Tabling both and taking up issues in Economic Development Committee and Long-Term Planning Committee; Toner hopes to discuss, delay for 6 months; Azeem agrees; Mallon agrees on Tabling; Tabled 9-0, Toner withdraws proposed amendments for now

Order #1. That the City Council refer the attached zoning petition regarding the Housing Contribution Rate to the Ordinance Committee and Planning Board for a hearing and report.   Vice Mayor Mallon
Order Adopted 9-0; Referred to Ordinance Committee and Planning Board

Lotsa-Listserv-Generated (LLG) Communications on the matter of proposed amendments to the Incentive Zoning Ordinance (Linkage Fee).

I’m not sure that there’s much to do this week other than to refer the lab restriction zoning petition to the Ordinance Committee and Planning Board, but suffice to say that there are contrasts between the “command and control” approach of banning lab uses and the more economically enlightened view of adjusting incentives to promote alternatives. I also still don’t know how the City defines a “lab”.


On the Table #5. An application was received from Andy Layman representing Tasty Burger, requesting permission for three (3) projecting signs at the premises numbered 23 Prospect Street. approval has been received from Inspectional Services, Department of Public Works, Community Development Department and abutter. [Tabled - Sept 12, 2022]
pulled by McGovern; Order Adopted 7-2 (DC,PN - NO)

This may be small potatoes over tasty burgers, and I do have a fondness for signage, but there is a limit on just how many signs are really necessary to help Mr. J. Wellington Wimpy find his way to his favorite meal (for which he’ll gladly pay you Tuesday).

Wimpy
By the way, before there was the tall building at the corner, there used to be a hamburger joint (Wimpy).

Resolution #1. Resolution on the death of Elie Yarden.   Councillor Zondervan, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Simmons

I have know many “activists” over the years - some of whom have been very difficult people - but Elie Yarden was always thoughtful and kind to me even when our views were as different as different can be.

Order #5. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Community Development Department to convene a North Massachusetts Avenue Corridor District Zoning Proposal Working Group Policy Order Proposing a North Massachusetts Avenue (NMA) Corridor Working Group for the purpose of developing comprehensive zoning recommendations.   Councillor Toner, Councillor Carlone, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Nolan
Pulled by Toner; Charter Right - Azeem

This is a very promising Order. I will note, however, that unlike the days of yore when CDD would study and process things to death before coming to any conclusions, they often now arrive with conclusions and simply run interference during any subsequent public process. Let’s hope this time is different.

Order #6. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Community Development Department to work with Councillors Azeem and Simmons on all necessary preparations for the next meeting in the discussion on potentially allowing multi-family housing to be built citywide.   Councillor Azeem, Councillor Simmons
Order Adopted 9-0

Generally speaking, allowing more flexibility in the kinds of residential housing that are permissible in any of the city’s residential zones is a good thing. I do worry, however, that this may just be the first step toward blenderizing Cambridge in the long term into just high density porridge. Personally, I like the fact that different parts of Cambridge have very different histories, densities, lot sizes, and residential patterns.

Order #7. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Traffic, Transportation and Parking Department to convene a series of meetings with the Vision Zero, Pedestrian Committee, Bicycle Committee, the newly appointed Bicycling Advisory Committee, Cambridge Police Department, and any other departments deemed necessary, to review and revise the Cambridge Street Code.   Councillor Toner, Councillor Carlone, Councillor Simmons, Councillor Nolan
Pulled by Toner; Mallon substitute Order; Charter Right - Simmons

There was a time when cycling advocates would proudly display their “One Less Car” or “Share the Road” T-shirts. Those were the days of peace and love and peasant blouses. Now it’s Lycra and spandex and “War on Cars” and “Separated Bike Lanes”. I also remember when the City’s Traffic Department and the Transportation Folks in CDD would emphasize safe operation of bicycles. Somewhere along the road the emphasis shifted from safe operation and cooperation to segregation. Meanwhile, lots of newfangled “mobility devices” have emerged and safe operation seems like an afterthought. - Robert Winters

Comments?

Cambridge City Charter Study Group

I would like to informally gather a group of concerned Cambridge residents to form a Study Group to better understand the Cambridge City Charter - past, present, and future - in detail. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the current Charter? How did we come to have the current (Plan E) Charter? What improvements to the governmental form and election methods might be advisable? [References]

This Study Group would be separate from the “official” Cambridge Charter Review Committee that was recently appointed by several city councillors. Among other things, this group can monitor the official review committee, discuss and critique any proposals coming from that committee, and independently propose alternatives. If you are interested, please let me know. - Robert Winters

1846 Charter
(original)
pre-1891 Charter
(as amended)
1891 Charter 1915 (Plan B) Charter 1940 (Plan E) Charter
(as amended)
M.G.L. Chapter 43: CITY CHARTERS
M.G.L. Chapter 43B: HOME RULE PROCEDURES
M.G.L. Chapter 43C: OPTIONAL FORMS OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ACT

Tues, Oct 11

5:30-7:30pm   Charter Review Committee Virtual Meeting #4  (Zoom)

Tues, Oct 25

5:30-7:30pm   Charter Review Committee Virtual Meeting #5  (Zoom)
Note: The fact that this committee is listed in the City Council Hearing Schedule (even though elected officials are explicitly prohibited from serving on the committee) is astonishing. Indeed, the fact that this requirement for Charter Review is now part of the revised Plan E Charter strongly suggests that appointments to the committee should have been made by the City Manager subject to review by the full City Council. Instead, all of the appointments were made by an ad-hoc group of 4 councillors without any review of the full City Council.

 

Linkage Increases - June 22, 2022 Ordinance Committee
To: Cambridge City Council
From: Patrick Barrett

Dear Ordinance Committee,Patrick Barrett

Attached is a brief synopsis of my point of view on the proposed linkage increases on the table for June 22. When the change was made in 2015 I made the sole protest of going down to 30k sq ft and thought the idea of tallying existing square footage would funnel development toward only the “highest and best use” which was laboratories and R&D. The 2019 nexus study shows exactly this. In an effort to capture dollars from the gold rush of lab uses throughout the city we have squelched infill development, repurposing existing sq ft for anything other than lab use, and obliterated the entertainments uses for the City. Further that this nexus study was done in December of 2019 should at least give some pause as the pandemic has changed this real estate landscape for decades to come. I kept it to one page … but I urge any of you concerned about livability and providing a fertile landscape of ideas and development in this city to read it and rethink what linkage is and what its actually supposed to do. I also urge this Council to expand their thoughts on what this city needs beyond simply affordable housing and to see this city from 30,000 feet not 2".

Good Luck,
Patrick W. Barrett III
617 778 3521

Incentive Project. Any new development that consists of at least thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of Gross Floor Area devoted to one or more of the following uses listed in Section 4.30 of the Zoning Ordinance: Sections 4.31 i-2 (Hotel or motel), 4.32 f (Radio and television studio), 4.33 b-5 (College or University not exempt by statute, specifically including those uses and facilities listed in Subsection 4.56 c-4, c-5, and c-6), 4.33 c (Noncommercial Research Facility), 4.33 d (Health Care Facilities), 4.33 e (Social Service Facilities), 4.34 (Office and Laboratory Use), 4.35 (Retail or Consumer Service Establishments), 4.36 (Outdoor Retail or Consumer Service Establishments), 4.37 (Light Industry, Wholesale Business and Storage), and 4.38 (Heavy Industry). For the purpose of this definition, new development shall mean (1) construction of new buildings or additions to existing buildings to accommodate uses in the above list, (2) substantial rehabilitation of buildings to accommodate uses in the above list for which the buildings were not originally used, or (3) Gross Floor Area whose use is changed from a use not included in the above list to a use included in the above list. In no case shall Gross Floor Area devoted to a Municipal Service Facility or Other Government Facility be considered an Incentive Project.

As the Council contemplates the change in linkage fee I ask that they review the policy and its effect on all uses allowed in our business and industrial districts other than just focusing solely on lab uses. In the 2019 nexus study which reviewed the effect of changes made to the inclusionary ordinance shows succinctly that 79.9% of all commercial development was categorized as “office/RD.”  The Council should ask for a further breakdown of this number as our ordinance that conflates Lab and Office uses as essentially the same category of use. Further of that commercial build 0% was in the hospitality area and only 4.7% of this was in the retail category, which includes anything from a shoe store to an opera house. I believe this heavily weighted development scheme is by design and to further increase linkage would not only hurt the city it would continue to funnel all development towards lab use. This is an unsurprising result coming from a study that claims restaurants have a 5 times greater impact on housing cost than R/D and lab.1

In the pursuit of extracting a maximum tax on commercial development in the City of Cambridge the City has employed a “scorched earth” methodology where a restaurant, a hotel, a gym, a level 3 lab, and an opera house all have the same impact on the costs of housing and lack of supply, and all pay the same rate. As part of the change in 2015 Cambridge lowered the project threshold to 30,000 sq ft; based on the 2019 nexus report nine (9) projects were built under 30k sq ft for a total of 167k sq ft and twenty eight (28) projects were built over the 30k threshold of which each individual project was more than the total combined sq ft of the 9 under 30k.2 Thus no one even attempted to build a project within the 30-50k threshold. Imagine trying to build a 30-50k sq ft theatre in the Cultural District of Central Square or trying to take the tens of thousands of commercial office space abandoned due to Covid and trying to make the math work for anything other than a lab use which currently can command as high as $200/sq ft? Why are we discouraging owners to “substantially rehabilitate” existing buildings? Further the date of this study is December 2019! At the very least two years plus of a pandemic ought to prompt some questions from this Council on the viability of an increase in the post Covid world.

Thus we have an overly aggressive tax scheme that disincentivizes any use other than lab, punishes restoration of existing parcels for anything other than lab, and overburdens arts, entertainment, and uses that could enhance and bring life to our business districts and communities. Please reject the increase in linkage fees, exempt existing sq ft for uses other than lab, and retore the project threshold to 50k sq ft as the current scheme doesn’t draw any revenue and it forces developers to make bad decisions that will greatly impact our business and cultural districts for decades to come.

Cambridge Nexus Study       pg 61 (Table 35)     Karl F. Seidman Consulting Services

Cambridge Nexus Study       pg 60     Karl F. Seidman Consulting Services

Plague Report (Oct 4) - One new death, new Covid cases remain relatively low, but the wasterwater counts have been high.

There were 30 new COVID positive tests and 1 new death (long-term care) reported on Monday, and the 7-day daily average decreased to 18.9. The total number of residents who have tested positive is now 33,056 (not including me and many others who have tested positive at home). The Cambridge total increased by 30 on Tuesday, and 35 (covering 3 days), 23, 35, 27, 43, 61 (covering 3 days), 25, 29, and 34 in recent days. Time will tell where this is headed, especially as the BA.4&5 variants work their way through. The 7-day averages now appear to be settled into the 15-25 range. The percentage of positive tests (measured over the last two weeks) stands at 5.65% (previous rates 5.91%, 6.40%, 6.05%, 5.94%, 6.15%, 5.72%, 6.87%, 7.32%, 7.55%, 7.69%, 6.88%, 5.98, 6.47%, 7.66%, 7.41%, 7.08%, 7.45%, 7.36%, 6.11%, 4.65%, 4.2%, 3.85%, 3%, 2.3%, 1.94%, 1.63%, 1.71%, 1.56%, 1.09%, 0.87%). Most importantly, the effects of the virus appear to be much milder than previous variants.

Experts say COVID-19 won’t hit as hard this fall, but remain wary of the possible rise of a new variant (Sept 1, 2022, Boston Globe)

Covid19 cases - Oct 4, 2022
Click on graph above for latest Cambridge data.

Oct 4, 2022 Breakdown of Cases:
33056 tested positive (total)
- an increase of 30 since Monday
[includes 4460 Harvard (0 new) and 2747 MIT (1 new)]
169 confirmed deaths - 87 in long-term care facilities, 82 in general community
(last new death recorded Oct 4)

7 Day Average - New Cases
Thanks to vaccinations, even though the 7-day averages were dreadful
the impacts were not as bad as they could have been.

City of Cambridge Covid Information     Harvard University COVID-19 data     MIT COVID-19 data

7-day averages
High vaccination rates have helped to blunt what might have been a larger surge and far more deaths.

Covid Cases by Age Group
Covid Cases by Age Group - through Sept 29, 2022

Wastewater - Sept 29, 2022
(click on above graph for the latest)
MWRA Biobot wastewater data - Sept 29, 2022
Wastewater, North System - Sept 29, 2022
MWRA Biobot recent wastewater data - North System - Sept 29, 2022
The 7-day average reached as high as 8644 in January before dropping to as low as 101 in March.
The recent rise due to the BA.2 variants brought it back up to 1273 after which it dropped to about half of that.
Very recently the wastewater figures have soared.
BA.5 is now dominant and the 7-day average now stands at 934.

Sample Date 9/6 9/7 9/8 9/9 9/10 9/11 9/12 9/13 9/14 9/15 9/16 9/17 9/18 9/19 9/20 9/21 9/22 9/23 9/24 9/25 9/26 9/27 9/28 9/29
North System (copies/ml) 473 735 826 701 485 684 489 573 851 595 375 495 450 384 537 731 714 1876 1357 875 1790 828 1272 825
Northern 7-day Avg. 613 611 650 647 609 627 613 630 644 614 562 563 530 513 508 497 510 642 742 816 1016 1081 1170 934

The main Omicron wave crested 9 months ago, and the Omicron BA.5 subvariant is now the predominant threat. The percentages detected in wastewater samples in Middlesex County are now BA.5 at 81.8%, BA.2* at 12.5%, BA.4 at 5.0%, and 0.7% other as of Sept 14.

Omicron Variant Overview - week of Sept 14, 2022

Region BA.2* BA.4 BA.5 Other
Nationwide 3.6% 6.1% 89.8% 0.5%
Midwest 0.0% 6.6% 93.1% 0.2%
Northeast 2.7% 8.0% 88.6% 0.7%
South 4.7% 6.2% 88.5% 0.6%
West 5.9% 3.1% 90.6% 0.3%

An asterisk (*) indicates that sub-lineages are included. BA.2.* includes BA.2.12.1 and other sublineages. “Other” indicates all other lineages of SARS-CoV-2.

Catching Up on the (Official) Cambridge NewsCity Seal

GIS Data Download Updates (Oct 4, 2022)

Cambridge Police Conducting Investigation Following Early Morning Shooting in Central Square (Oct 3, 2022)

Apply to the DHSP Preschool Lottery for the 2023-2024 academic year! (Oct 3, 2022)

November 8, 2022 State Election Voting Options (Oct 3, 2022)

Opening Celebration for the Foundry, Cambridge's Inclusive Hub for Creative Exploration October 8 (Oct 3, 2022)

Fuel Assistance Program Accepting Applications (Oct 3, 2022)

Overhead Wire Removal Continuing October 1 (Sept 29, 2022)
Electric Trolley Decommissioning by the MBTA

Cambridge Police Invite Community to Two Upcoming Events: Coffee With A Cop on October 5 & Creating Connections Community Fair on October 8 (Sept 29, 2022)

Disability Friendly Vaccine Clinics October 19 and November 16 (Sept 29, 2022)

Community Meeting on Memorial Drive Closures Scheduled for October 6 (Sept 27, 2022)

Mosaics From Millers River Apartments Being Restored (Sept 26, 2022)

October is National Women’s Business Month (Sept 26, 2022)

City of Cambridge Online Resident Opinion Survey is Underway. The survey is open to all Cambridge residents through October 9, 2022 (Sept 23, 2022)

Recreation Summer Basketball Leagues Teach Skills, Build Community for Hundreds of Young Athletes (Sept 22, 2022)

Expect traffic and road closures September 24-25 near Harvard Square & North Cambridge (Sept 22, 2022)

Bow Tie Ride Returns October 2 (Sept 21, 2022)

Bob Moses MathTrail Celebration, Saturday, October 1, 10am–2pm (Sept 20, 2022)

Cambridge Seniors: Join Music Jam Sessions this Fall! (Sept 20, 2022)

Danehy Park Day Event - 2022 (Sept 19, 2022)

GIS Data Download Updates (Sept 19, 2022)

MBTA Orange and Green Line service to resume September 19 (Sept 16, 2022)

Check Out the Latest Issue of The Cambridge Life Magazine to Learn some of the ways the City Supports its Most Vulnerable Populations (Sept 14, 2022)

Expect traffic and road closures near MIT and Central Square on September 18 (Sept 13, 2022)

Apply to the Cambridge Business Planning Program (Sept 13, 2022)

Suspect Arrested in Connection with Sunday Afternoon Shooting in Cambridge (Sept 12, 2022)

Housed In Cambridge Drop-In Hours September 19 (Sept 12, 2022)

September 6, 2022 State Primary Official Results (Sept 12, 2022)

September 11th Remembrance (Sept 11, 2022)

Apply For Cambridge Arts Grants (Sept 8, 2022)

Federal Grant Draft Evaluation Report Available (Sept 8, 2022)

Overhead Wire Removal Beginning Sept. 9 (Sept 8, 2022)
Electric Trolley Decommissioning by the MBTA

Community Meetings on Memorial Drive Closures: September 13 and 14 (Sept 6, 2022)

Port Pride, Cambridge Carnival, and Saints Cosmos and Damian Festival: Expect traffic and road closures September 9 to 11 (Sept 6, 2022)

Yi-An Huang Takes the Helm as Cambridge City Manager (Sept 6, 2022)

Q&A with New City Manager Yi-An Huang (Sept 6, 2022)

Library to Host Park Sounds in Honor of Janet Axelrod (Sept 6, 2022)
The Albino Mbie Trio and HobArt Goulart will headline the final performance in CPL Park Sounds, the Cambridge Public Library’s summer music series on Wed, Sept 14, from 6-7:30pm. The series is dedicated to Janet Axelrod, who was a friend of the Library, musician, and late chair of the Library’s Board of Trustees. Bring a blanket or a chair and join us outside of the Main Library in Joan Lorentz Park for Park Sounds!

Danehy Park Family Day Saturday, September 17, 11am-3pm (Sept 5, 2022)

CDC Recommends Updated Booster Shots for Better Protection Against Omicron (Sept 2, 2022)

Free Document Shredding Event Saturday, September 17, 2022 (Sept 1, 2022)

City Hall Front Entrance Closed for Construction June 6 - August 1 (June 2, 2022)
Request: Please relocate the flags over the entrance so that the message from Frederick Hastings Rindge is no longer obscured.

City Hall Inscription - Frederick Hastings Rindge

Featured recent stories in the Cambridge Chronicle (the paper of record) - with some comments:

Cambridge ChronicleIf you would like to subscribe or pick up a free paper copy at various sites, I encourage you to do so. It really is The Paper of Record (even if the parent company (Gannett) is neglecting it and worse).

MA electricity, gas prices going up 64 percent compared to last year (Sept 22, 2022)

Measure to limit wildlife-killing rat, mice poisons is in Senate hands (Sept 22, 2022)

Somerville, Medford rents rise as landlords tout Green Line Extension (Sept 22, 2022, subscribers only)

Removing dams restores river ecology, but the process can take years (Sept 15, 2022)

Is the drought making MA water unsafe? Here's where e-coli outbreaks have been reported (Sept 12, 2022)

Coalition says just enforcing waste bans would greatly reduce trash (Sept 9, 2022)

Plans show Cambridge nightclub, music venue could become 6-story hotel (Sept 7, 2022)

PHOTOS: Oldtime Baseball Game honors Jim Corsi (Aug 25, 2022)

Beware the Asian longhorned beetle and lanternfly, Mass residents advised (Aug 17, 2022)

Governor’s desk crowded with almost 70 measures still pending (Aug 11, 2022)

Featured this week (and more) in the Calendar:

Tues, Oct 11

1:00pm   The City Council’s Transportation and Public Utilities Committee will conduct a public meeting to discuss station expansion, rebalancing, and e-bike implementation with the BlueBikes system.  (Sullivan Chamber and Zoom)

5:30-7:30pm   Charter Review Committee Virtual Meeting #4  (Zoom)
Note: The fact that this committee is listed in the City Council Hearing Schedule (even though elected officials are explicitly prohibited from serving on the committee) is astonishing. Indeed, the fact that this requirement for Charter Review is now part of the revised Plan E Charter strongly suggests that appointments to the committee should have been made by the City Manager subject to review by the full City Council. Instead, all of the appointments were made by an ad-hoc group of 4 councillors without any review of the full City Council.

6:00pm   School Committee Meeting  (Attles Meeting Room, CRLS)
The next Regular Meeting of the School Committee will be held on Tues, Oct 11at 6:00pm for the purpose of discussing any and all business that may properly come before the Committee.

6:30pm   Planning Board Meeting  (Remote via Zoom)

Wed, Oct 12

2:00pm   The City Council’s Health and Environment Committee will meet to discuss the issue of water quality of the Cambridge water supply including PFAS levels, and comparison with the MWRA system, the long-term strategy for ensuring water quality standards for all users and all other water quality related issues and concerns.  (Sullivan Chamber and Zoom)

Mon, Oct 17

5:30pm   City Council meeting  (Sullivan Chamber and Zoom)

Mon, Oct 24

5:30pm   City Council meeting  (Sullivan Chamber and Zoom)

Tues, Oct 25

10:00am   The City Council’s Government Operations, Rules and Claims Committee will conduct a public meeting to discuss potential amendments to the Rules of the City Council.  (Sullivan Chamber and Zoom)

5:30-7:30pm   Charter Review Committee Virtual Meeting #5  (Zoom)
Note: The fact that this committee is listed in the City Council Hearing Schedule (even though elected officials are explicitly prohibited from serving on the committee) is astonishing. Indeed, the fact that this requirement for Charter Review is now part of the revised Plan E Charter strongly suggests that appointments to the committee should have been made by the City Manager subject to review by the full City Council. Instead, all of the appointments were made by an ad-hoc group of 4 councillors without any review of the full City Council.

Wed, Oct 26

1:00pm   The City Council’s Ordinance Committee will hold a public hearing on a Zoning Petition to amend Section 11.202(d) of Article 11.000, entitled SPECIAL REGULATIONS, of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cambridge, by substitution with the following text: “(d) Reevaluation of Housing Contribution Rate. The City shall initiate a reevaluation of the Housing Contribution Rate and any other aspect of these Incentive Zoning Provisions at an interval of no less than three (3) years from the time of the previous reevaluation. Such reevaluation shall include a report provided to the City Council reviewing economic factors including but not limited to development activity, commercial rents per square foot, employment growth, housing trends measured in terms of, but not limited to, vacancy rates, production statistics, and prices for dwelling units, and the nexus between Incentive Projects and housing.”  (Sullivan Chamber and Zoom)

Mon, Oct 31

5:30pm   City Council meeting  (Sullivan Chamber and Zoom)