Cambridge InsideOut - October 20, 2020

Robert and JudyPossible Topics:

1) T Minus 14 Days and Counting

2) Ballot Questions - especially Question 2 and RCV

3) Oct 19 Cambridge City Council meeting

The Return of International City Council Resolutions

4) Municipal Broadband and Cambridge Trees

5) Oct 5 Cambridge City Council meeting

Tax Rate Hearing and Classification

Environmental regulation and initiatives - carrot vs. stick

Heat lamps and other accommodations for businesses during pandemic

Shared Streets updates

Response on policing alternatives

Cycling Safety Ordinance

Affordable Housing Overlay and long-term sustainability, taxpayer support

Cannabis delivery legislation, litigation

Neighborhood Conservation Districts

6) Of Tempests and Teapots

7) Covid-19 Status

8) Charter Review? - Sept 23 Special Meeting

How to Break a Political Machine (1946 article)

9) Participatory Budgeting

10) Civic Calendar


Voting Options and Voter Registration for the State/Presidential Election, November 3 - Cambridge, MA

In order to provide increased voting options in response to COVID-19, 950 House Bill 4820 was passed and signed into law as Chapter 115 of the Acts of 2020 “for the immediate preservation of public health and convenience.” Accordingly, early voting is available to all voters for the State/Presidential Election on November 3rd. Early voting is available by mail and in person to all registered voters and no excuse is required.

Voters are encouraged to wear a mask or face covering in the Early Voting locations and on Election Day at polling sites (except for reasons listed in CDC or Massachusetts Department of Public Health guidelines) to help mitigate public health risks associated with COVID-19.

However you choose to vote, please be advised that once a voter casts an early voting ballot, the voter may no longer vote at the polls.

Early Voting

To vote by mail:

  1. Complete a Vote by Mail Application; you can apply online or download an application at www.MailMyBallotMA.com or send a written request with your name, Cambridge address, address where you want the ballot sent, and your signature. Applications can be sent by:Vote
  2. Vote when your ballot arrives.
  3. Return your voted and sealed ballot to the Cambridge Election Commission by mail, ballot drop box, or in person.
  4. Check the status of your ballot at www.TrackMyBallotMA.com

The deadline to return a Vote by Mail ballot is November 3rd at 8:00pm or postmarked by November 3rd and delivered to the Cambridge Election Commission by November 6th in order to be counted.

The deadline to submit a Vote by Mail Application for a mailed ballot for the election is Wednesday, October 28th at 5:00pm. The U.S. Postal Service recommends submitting this application no later than October 20th to ensure the timely delivery of your ballot.

The Election Commission is open to the public by appointment only. Please schedule an appointment at https://calendly.com/cambridge-election-commission

Official Ballot Drop Box Locations

Official ballot drop boxes will be available at the following six (6) locations for Cambridge voters beginning Friday, October 9th through Tuesday, November 3rd at 8:00pm:Vote

  1. City Hall - Near the back door of the building located at 795 Massachusetts Avenue
  2. Morse School - Near the front entrance of the building located at 40 Granite Street
  3. Cambridge Police Headquarters - Right-side of the front of the building located at 125 6th Street
  4. Maria L. Baldwin School - Right-side of the Oxford Street entrance of the building located at 28 Sacramento Street
  5. O’Neill Library - Adjacent to the entrance stairs of the building located at 70 Rindge Avenue
  6. Coffon Building - Right-side of the front of the building located at 51 Inman Street

To vote in person, visit any one of the three (3) early voting locations offered in Cambridge during the period from Saturday, October 17th to Friday, October 30th for the State/Presidential Election. You must be a registered voter in Cambridge to vote at the early voting locations. Please refer to the City’s designated early voting schedule below. The deadline to vote early in person is Friday, October 30th at 5:00pm.

EARLY VOTING LOCATIONS, HOURS AND DAYS

Longfellow Community School – 359 Broadway, rear entrance

Cambridge Water Department - 250 Fresh Pond Parkway

Valente Library – 826 Cambridge Street, side entrance on Berkshire Street

Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
October 17 October 18 October 19 October 20 Octiber 21 October 22 October 23
9:00am - 3:00pm 9:00am - 3:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm

 

Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
October 24 October 25 October 26 October 27 Octiber 28 October 29 October 30
1:00pm - 7:00pm 9:00am - 3:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm 9:30am - 5:00pm

 

The Election Commission office located 51 Inman Street will NOT be an early voting location for the State/Presidential Election, November 3rd. Voters must go to one of the designated early voting locations listed above.

* The voter registration deadline is Saturday, October 24th at 8:00pm. The Election Commission will be open from 1:00pm to 8:00pm. Please schedule an appointment. If you are unable to schedule an appointment, Election Commission staff will be available to accept completed voter registration forms near the side entrance of the Coffon Building on Inman Place, Cambridge.

Voting on Election Day & Relocation of Some Polling Sites

Voting on Election Day will still be available for those who want to vote at the polls, but, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some polling sites (like those in high-risk facilities) were temporarily relocated for the upcoming State/Presidential Election on November 3rd. Your temporary location will be in the same ward and precinct or near your regular polling site for voter convenience and to minimize voter confusion. In the next few weeks, voters will receive an Early Voting Guide and a Voter Notification Card in the mail that will have information pertaining to any relocated polling places and other important election related information. [Cambridge Polling Sites - Fall 2020]

Voter Registration

For anyone wanting to vote early in person, by mail, or by drop box, the first step is making sure you are registered. To check your voter registration status and to find information on how to register to vote, please go to www.registertovotema.com. You will need a license, or an I.D. issued by the Registry of Motor Vehicles to apply online. To be eligible to vote in the State/Presidential Election on November 3rd, you must register to vote or make changes to your voter registration by Saturday, October 24th at 8:00pm.


Superstition - October 19, 2020 Cambridge City Council Agenda

There are 13 Communications, 13 Resolutions, and 13 Orders on this week's agenda. Good thing there were 14 items on the City Manager's Agenda or I would have on the Last Train to Clarksville. Here's the pick of the litter:
[Note: This is the first time I'm writing these comments post-meeting. Given the choice between civic/political commentary and finishing grading a large stack of mathematics exams, the grading won out.]Red City Hall

Manager's Agenda #2. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-32, regarding the feasibility of identifying one evening or day per week that the Fresh Pond Golf Course can be open to the public for general use.

The very predictable rhetoric centered on "equity" and the unspeakable horror that not every square foot of land is open to anyone at any hour of any day for any reason. The City Manager assured the verklempt councillors that people could frolic on the golf course after the golf season was over.

Manager's Agenda #3. Transmitting communication from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $175,000, from Free Cash to the Public Investment Public Works Extraordinary Expenditures account to launch a COVID-19 sewer testing program.

City Engineer Kathy Watkins reported that samples will be drawn weekly from three representative sites East Cambridge/Inman Sq., N. Cambridge, and the Port to detect viral load in wastewater, and that results should start pouring in this November.

Manager's Agenda #5. Transmitting communication from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $50,000 received from the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) Innovate Energy Efficiency Grant Program, to the Grant Fund Community Development Department Other Ordinary Maintenance account which will be used to support the Cambridge Multifamily Energy Retrofit Program, which aims to increase the energy efficiency of multifamily buildings with 5-49 units by offering technical, solar, and financing support.

I'll again take this opportunity to express how thrilled I am with another program (carried out thanks to a partnership between the City of Cambridgeand the nonprofit All In Energy) that will soon be blowing insulation into all the walls of my triple-decker plus additional energy-saving measures at zero cost to me. Carrots work better than sticks.

Manager's Agenda #6. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-21, regarding a report on developing a Vacant Storefront Registry.

CDD Asst. City Manager Iram Farooq reported that CDD has been keeping such a registry for some time. She also explained to the “fine 'em 'til it hurts” councillors that fines for extended vacancies usually can be shucked off by the big guys and might only hurt the little guys. Better to just work with those property owners for better outcomes - what a concept!

Manager's Agenda #8. Transmitting communication from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $50,000 from Free Cash to the Public Investment Fund Executive Department Extraordinary Expenditures Account for the City's third annual contribution to the MBTA Green Line Extension project.

The councillors didn't pull this item, but it's really exciting to see the progress that's being made on the GLX and the associated bike/ped corridor and RR crossings. Check out some of the pictures.

Manager's Agenda #9. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-49, regarding a report on the feasibility of closing several blocks of streets in Harvard Square to vehicular traffic, with the exception of deliveries.

Manager's Agenda #12. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to a response to Policy Order O-13 of Oct 5, 2020, regarding a draft Truck Safety Ordinance.

DPW Commissioner Owen O'Riordan cautioned that imposing broad requirements on all City contractors could negatively impact necessities such as street paving since these contractors operate throughout the state/region and the City would have limited leverage. It's also a fact that idealist restrictions on City-funded services and initiatives can significantly increase costs in exchange for limited benefit.

Manager's Agenda #13. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-50, regarding a report on publicizing and enforcing and publicizing the eviction moratorium.

Order #10. That the City Manager confer with the Legal Department on the feasibility of making Cambridge’s Eviction Moratorium stronger to protect our tenants from displacement.   Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor McGovern, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler

It has been interesting watching the alarmist and opportunistic rhetoric propagate on this issue. Suffice to say that the Governor recently approved a $171 million "eviction diversion initiative" to assist both tenants and landlords, the City has an open-ended eviction moratorium still in place, and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) still has a national ban on evictions of tenants with verifiable pandemic-related hardships.

Manager's Agenda #14. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Zoning Recommendations for Retail Uses and Home Occupations.

Committee Report #1. A communication was received from Paula Crane, Deputy City Clerk, transmitting a report from Vice Mayor Mallon, Chair of the Economic Development and University Relations Committee, for a public hearing held on Sept 30, 2020 the purpose of receiving final recommendations from the Community Development Department on updating the commercial land use classification system within the Cambridge Zoning Ordinance.

Committee Report #2. A communication was received from Paula Crane, Deputy City Clerk, transmitting a report from Vice Mayor Mallon, Chair of the Economic Development and University Relations Committee, for a public hearing held on July 30, 2020 to discuss to receive an update on the Retail Land Use Initiative and Retail Table of Land Use Update.

It's great to see some progress finally being made on this. I haven't yet bothered to read all the fine details, so I'll simply express my view that Cambridge has long been overly prescriptive in its allowed uses, and that's likely to still be the case even with these proposed changes. It's one thing to have regulations in place to prevent noxious uses, but it's another thing to be prescribing things to the point that jelly donuts can be sold but cream-filled donuts cannot. [I'm joking, of course, but I hope you get the idea.] Both of the proposed zoning changes (Retail Uses and Home Occupations) were referred to the Planning Board and Ordinance Committee where we'll have some time to look at the details. It is perhaps worth mentioning that, because of the pandemic, most Cambridge residences have now become workplaces.

Charter Right #2. That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the Cambridge Historical Commission and other relevant City Departments to ensure that any report or recommendation for a new Neighborhood Conservation District in Cambridge presented to the City Council include an analysis of the potential effects on City housing affordability based on current research, as well as any mitigations that the Cambridge Historical Commission recommends, so that the City Council may holistically evaluate the matter. [CHARTER RIGHT EXERCISED BY COUNCILLOR CARLONE IN COUNCIL OCT 5, 2020]

This entire matter has become a case of competing narratives between political partisans - with the ABC crowd identifying anyone who would stand in the way of their Jerome Rappaportization of Cambridge. In their grand vision for East Cambridge and elsewhere, we may soon be seeing signs saying "If you lived here you'd be home now" where the densely-packed homes of immigrants once stood.

Applications & Petitions #1. A Zoning Petition has been received from Arvind Srinivasan regarding zoning language relative to the Alewife Quadrangle Northwest Overlay.

This makes the 4th installment of proposed zoning in the NW part of Alewife Quadrangle starting last September.

Order #1. That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to work with the City Solicitor’s Office and other relevant departments to determine what impact the Executive Order on Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping may have on the City of Cambridge and its community partners, what options the City may have to work around this order, and to report back to the City Council on this matter in a timely manner.   Councillor Simmons, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Mayor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor Mallon

Order #3. That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the City Solicitor on an ordinance requiring the city to only purchase goods that are made in full compliance with USA environmental and labor standards.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor McGovern, Mayor Siddiqui

While I'm sure we can all appreciate the intent, my instincts tell me that the City may soon be exclusively using triple-priced eco-pencils, dirty-grey eco-paper, driving double-priced vehicles (or organically-grown bikes) while feasting on nothing other than organic not-burgers washed down with fair trade coffee.

Order #6. That the City Manager be and is hereby requested to work with staff and Eversource representatives to set up a public meeting with residents.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toomey, Councillor Zondervan, Councillor Nolan

Could someone contact Eversource and tell them that it's been 6 years since they did a temporary electrical hookup to my building and never returned to finish the job? Believe me, I have tried my best to no avail to get Eversource to finish what they started.


Order #7. That the City of Cambridge stands in solidarity with the Armenian people in Cambridge, throughout the Commonwealth and world, and the Republic of Artsakh.   Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Carlone, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Zondervan

Order #9. That the City of Cambridge call upon Senator Warren and Senator Markey to call for an end to immigration detention in the United States, the immediate reunification of immigrant families and the release of migrant children and parents from detention, and also to afford these families due process by allowing them the full and fair opportunity to seek protection from the United States.   Mayor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor Carlone, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler

It's so nice to see Cambridge returning to normal, especially in the field of international relations. I really miss the days of City Council orders seeking to depose leaders like Muammar Gaddafi. Clearly this is what made all the difference in Libya. By the way, Public Comment on Order #7 primarily was phoned in from New Jersey and led to a more Turk-friendly substitute version of this most important piece of Cambridge Intentional Legislation.


Order #11. That the City Manager is hereby requested to instruct the Commissioner of Public Works to utilize continuous planting strips along bike lanes and at all reduced roadway areas in Harvard Square rather than painted buffer zones in Harvard Square to fully address bike and pedestrian safety in Harvard Square.   Councillor Carlone, Councillor McGovern, Councillor Zondervan

Perhaps we should ask the DPW Commissioner about the realities of maintaining "planting strips" in the middle of roadways. Sustainability isn't just about climate change. How long do trees and plantings in narrow strips in roadways actually survive? How will these structures impact snow removal operations?

Order #12. That the City Manager is hereby requested to instruct the Finance Department to provide a dollar amount and percentage of money used by every department to address racial and economic equity in the 2022 Fiscal Year Budget, highlighting additional areas to be considered and that the City Manager present plans for implementation in the 2022 Fiscal Year Budget.   Councillor Carlone, Councillor Simmons

Order #13. Policy Order calling for Judge Roanne Sragow to be reinstated to her position and remain in Cambridge.   Councillor McGovern, Vice Mayor Mallon, Mayor Siddiqui

I learned last week of the retirement of Judge Sragow who has for some time been convening the very innovative and helpful "Homeless Court" in Central Square and Harvard Square. Apparently this was a mandatory age-based retirement even though other judges continue beyond the mandatory age. There is now an outcry from many quarters requesting that Judge Sragow be called upon to reconvene the "Homeless Court" initiative in Cambridge. That would be a Very Good Thing. - Robert "better late than never" Winters

Comments?


What's on the October 5, 2020 Cambridge City Council Agenda? Taxes! Revolution! Cannabis!

Here's my grab bag of agenda items that will see some action or which seem either interesting or ridiculous or otherwise noteworthy.

Manager's Agenda #1. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to votes necessary to seek approval from the Massachusetts Department of Revenue of the tax rate for FY2021. [Manager’s Letter]

There are so many statistics you could look at when comparing things over the years, but here are a few:

Year Property Tax Levy Annual
Increase
Residential
Tax Rate
(per $1000)
Commercial
Tax Rate
(per $1000)
Ratio
(Comm/Res)
Median
Tax
(single)
Median
Tax
(condo)
Median
Tax
(2-fam)
Median
Tax
(3-fam)
FY2021 $472,520,148 7.85% $5.85 $11.85 2.03 $5,761 $1,608 $5,471 $6,711
FY2020 $438,128,694 6.91% $5.75 $12.68 2.21 $5,515 $1,605 $5,340 $6,493
FY2019 $409,809,861 5.33% $5.94 $13.71 2.31 $5,066 $1,562 $4,974 $6,124
FY2018 $389,080,359 4.40% $6.29 $14.81 2.35 $4,942 $1,541 $4,682 $5,655
FY2017 $372,674,087 5.15% $6.49 $16.12 2.48 $4,806 $1,465 $4,649 $5,594
FY2016 $354,430,753 3.80% $6.99 $17.71 2.53 $4,482 $1,454 $4,412 $5,258
FY2015 $341,445,455 3.93% $7.82 $19.29 2.47 $4,418 $1,472 $4,310 $5,040
FY2014 $328,544,945 3.66% $8.38 $20.44 2.44 $4,407 $1,457 $3,976 $4,787
FY2013 $316,947,770 5.97% $8.66 $21.50 2.48 $4,298 $1,495 $3,866 $4,586
FY2012 $299,090,641 5.33% $8.48 $20.76 2.45 $4,139 $1,430 $3,786 $4,501
FY2011 $283,961,699 5.69% $8.16 $19.90 2.44 $3,870 $1,370 $3,609 $4,286
FY2010 $268,662,984 5.38% $7.72 $18.75 2.43 $3,564 $1,293 $3,477 $4,132
FY2009 $254,945,578 5.20% $7.56 $17.97 2.38 $3,445 $1,224 $3,430 $4,091

While it's noteworthy that the 7.85% increase in the property tax levy is very high, it needs to be emphasized that this is only after leaving 125 positions vacant (which allows for an FY21 budget rescission of $5 million), the allocation of $24.5 million from reserve accounts to reduce the levy, and other measures.Real Estate Tax House

It's also worth emphasizing that property taxes this fiscal year are based on assessed property values as of Jan 1, 2020 - before the pandemic rolled into town. Many commercial properties are now generating considerably less income and that may be reflected in lower assessed property values come Jan 1, 2020. We have for a long time been taking full advantage of the property tax classification and the ability to set different tax rates for commercial vs. residential properties (within legal limits). This has allowed Cambridge to keep residential property taxes in check. If commercial values slip, it is quite likely that a considerable amount of the tax burden will shift to residential properties. The Manager's message alludes to this: “It is also important to recognize that a healthy balance of development between residential and commercial be continued to ensure homeowner’s real estate taxes remain affordable.”

I strongly recommend that you read the entire Tax Rate letter from the City Manager and think about what next year's letter may say if the pandemic continues to takes its economic toll.


Manager's Agenda #4. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to the appointment of the Net Zero Action Plan Task Force for a term of nine-months.

Order #12. That the Council go on record supporting the passage of S.2500 and H.4933 and to support the inclusion of the following in the final bill: 1) The development of a net zero stretch code by DOER (S.2500, § 30-31, 54) 2) The consideration of geographically diverse communities, including low-income communities, in the development of a net zero stretch code (S.2500, § 54) 3) The increase in membership and the establishment of term limits for the Board of Building Regulations and Standards (H.4933, § 15A-F).   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Zondervan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler

Committee Report #1. A report of the Ordinance Committee Meeting held on Aug 26, 2020 regarding Green Energy Analysis Zoning Amendments. [minutes have not yet been posted]

Rah, Rah, Rah for environmental initiatives! It's worth noting, however, that energy efficiency usually translates into cost savings in the long run - and many homeowners and developers will incorporate energy efficiency into their homes and projects regardless of any mandates from state and local government. Carrots work better than sticks.

I'll be soon taking advantage of a free (or at least reduced cost) insulation program in my house, but not because a few city councillors are twisting my arm to do it. I have some serious concerns about layering one mandate on top of another so that at some point a homeowner may simply delay repairs and renovations because of the added costs and restrictions. But I'm sure the councillors will feel perfectly righteous.


Manager's Agenda #8. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-26, regarding a report on placing four little free libraries.

“Liberation Libraries” – Perhaps this will start a trend of topic-specific “little free libraries” around the city. I could start a “little free math library” or maybe a “cosmology corner”. It would help me reduce the weight of books in my house. Now that would be another kind of liberation.


Manager's Agenda #9. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-47, regarding a report on heat lamps and outdoor dining during the COVID-19 public health crisis.

Manager's Agenda #11. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to a response to City Council request at the Special Meeting relative to COVID-19 Update of Sept 29, 2020, to provide opinions on the question of eviction moratoria applicability.

Order #5. That the City Manager be and is hereby requested to work with the Public Health Department and the Law Department to amend Cambridge’s Moratorium on Eviction Enforcement to make clear that it remains in effect after October 17 and until at least the end of the state of emergency is declared.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Zondervan, Councillor Carlone

Leave it to the good folks of the Central Square Business Improvement District to lead the charge in arranging for heat lamps to give local restaurants an extra tool to help them survive the Covid assault on businesses further into the colder weather months. Big thanks to some particular heros in the City administration (you know who you are) for helping to ease the bureaucratic burdens.

Regarding the matter of moratoriums on evictions and the relationship between commercial and residential landlords and their tenants, there is so much that has gone on out of the public eye in terms of rent forgiveness, renegotiated leases, and deferred rent that the politicians either fail to see or refuse to recognize. To them, it's like that Rahm Emanuel quote: “Never allow a good crisis go to waste. It’s an opportunity to do the things you once thought were impossible.” Whether it's using a shared street to execute mode shifts or fast-track your bicycle plans; or using the threat of a “tsunami of evictions” to attempt to reinstitute rent controls; or perhaps even using economic hardship to pursue your anti-capitalist agenda, there's nothing like a good crisis to grease your political axles.


Manager's Agenda #12. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-41, regarding a report on the feasibility of an alternative Public Safety Crisis Response System.

Given the choice between listening to a bunch of sheeplike “Defund the Police” activists or reading a well-reasoned response from Police Commissioner Bard and other expert City staff, I'll choose the latter any day of the week.


Unfinished Business #3. That the “2020 Cycling Safety Ordinance” be forwarded to the Ordinance Committee for discussion and recommendation. [PASSED TO A SECOND READING IN COUNCIL SEPT 14, 2020. TO BE ORDAINED ON OR AFTER OCT 5, 2020]

Communications & Reports #2. A communication was received from Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, regarding the Cycling Safety Ordinance.

I am convinced that the mandatory aspects of this Ordinance are not legally enforceable - though I'm sure that the City administration will carry out most of it nonetheless. It's one thing to lay out your vision for reconfiguring roads for better safety, but micromanaging the City Manager and City departments is another thing altogether. Then again, I suppose if there were 5 city councillors who wanted to pass a municipal ordinance requiring candy-striped streets, they could pass the ordinance and then screech at the Manager and threaten to not renew his contract for having used less-distracting road materials.


Unfinished Business #4. 100% Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning Petition 2020. [PASSED TO A SECOND READING IN COUNCIL SEPT 14, 2020. TO BE ORDAINED ON OR AFTER OCT 5, 2020]

This will be ordained, of course, but that doesn't make it any less of an offensive cross between an eminent-domain taking and an ideological agenda to relentlessly shift residential properties from private ownership toward public and quasi-public ownership that will forevermore rely on taxpayer support for maintaining these properties in perpetuity.


Order #3. That the Council go on record requesting the Secretary of Transportation Stephanie Pollack consider an I-90 lane reduction and at-grade design during the final decision-making process.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Zondervan, Councillor McGovern

A viaduct or an at-grade multi-lane highway are both barriers. I'm far more interested in the peripheral aspects of this project (like a better-connected road and path network and better) than about the number of lanes or whether a portion remains elevated.


Order #4. That the Cambridge City Council adopt the following amendments to Chapter 5.50 of the Municipal Ordinances of the City of Cambridge entitled “CANNABIS BUSINESS PERMITTING”.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor McGovern, Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Zondervan

Order #8. Cannabis Delivery-Only Zoning Ordinance.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor McGovern, Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Zondervan

Doesn't it seem like this City Council and the previous City Council care more about cannabis than just about anything else? Perhaps they need an intervention.


Order #9. That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the Cambridge Historical Commission and other relevant City Departments to ensure that any report or recommendation for a new Neighborhood Conservation District in Cambridge presented to the City Council include an analysis of the potential effects on City housing affordability based on current research, as well as any mitigations that the Cambridge Historical Commission recommends, so that the City Council may holistically evaluate the matter.   Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor Zondervan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Mayor Siddiqui

One of the more bizarre aspects of this City Council is their tendency to simply absorb the rhetoric of their activist handlers without questioning the validity of their gripes. The latest talking point among the YIMBY crowd is that historic presevation is fundamentally racist or elitist or profit-driven and that any effort to preserve some of the more endearing qualities of your neighborhood makes you evil incarnate.

The current case involves some East Cambridge residents who would prefer to not see their particular brand of very dense neighborhood wiped clean in favor of large ugly boxes. Given the choice between closely-spaced two-family homes with grape arbors and tomato plants versus a boring box of a building with a concierge, I'll choose the former. In terms of affordability, those old Italian ladies and gentlemen of East Cambridge have done more to provide housing at affordable rents for generations than any of the vultures now circling.


Order #10. That the City Council go on record supporting the Roe Act and restate its commitment to the protection of abortion rights, reproductive health care rights, and individuals’ rights to make reproductive decisions about their own bodies.   Mayor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler

I try to pay as little attention as possible to what goes on in Washington, DC. I do, however, understand that if family planning access becomes no longer guaranteed across the country, it will be very important for individual states to provide such guarantees in whatever manner is consistent with the needs and wishes of its residents.


Order #13. That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to work with the Transportation Department and Solicitor to provide the City with an update on the progress toward a draft [Truck Safety] Ordinance as soon as possible and with the draft of an Ordinance by Oct 19, 2020.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Zondervan, Councillor Toomey

One of the things I remember from decades ago is that federal jurisdiction in interstate commerce is pretty serious business and that regulating truck traffic is not easy. You can put restrictions and make safety improvements on your own vehicles and perhaps those of companies with whom you have contracts, but just about everything else will require endless studies and viable alternatives that won't be challenged in court. - Robert Winters

Comments?


Of Tempests and Teapots

Oct 1, 2020 - At this week's Special City Council meeting that featured various pandemic-related updates, it seems that the one revelation that lit up a few councillors like light bulbs was an update from Traffic Director Joseph Barr in response to a question about the status of proposed additions to the "shared streets" initiative that currently includes Garden Street, most of Magazine Street, and Harvard Street west of Prospect. According to Joe Barr, the feedback on the proposed changes was "underwhelming" with lots of resistance and concerns about traffic impacts and safety. Since there is apparently "not a significant appetite", the City plans to simply maintain what we already have and not pursue additional changes at this time. Needless to say, several councillors practically blew their gaskets at the notion that City staff might revise plans based on community feedback. [That said, I'm sure the intolerant insiders will insist on pushing this backdoor bike plan in order to get a few more street changes before winter.]

Personally, I like some of these shared streets in principle, but I find the implementation to be shabby at best. The main feature seems to be randomly placed A-frame signs that make roads into low-skill slalom courses. I also wonder about their effectiveness. Are they there for practical reasons or merely just to make a show of how gloriously progressive we think we are - the driving force behind more than a few Cambridge public policies. My observations are that they are underutilized at best - though I think they're great for some of the cyclists. The rationale that they were needed for the purpose of social distancing seems to have been based more on fiction than fact.

There was also the suggestion at the Special meeting that even though our numbers are among the best in the Commonwealth, we should be doing more because we are just so damned wealthy. Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler neatly cherry-picked the per-capita-income statistics when he noted that "except for Newton" we had the highest per capita income in the state - among cities. It's worth noting that of the 351 cities and towns in Massachusetts there are only 54 cities - and 297 towns.When you list all municipalities, Cambridge comes in at #52 in per capita income at $47,448. Nearby Boookline ranks #13 at $65,349, but I guess that doesn't count because it's a town rather than a city. Weston still ranks #1 at $105,217. I think it's fair to say that Cambridge has gone above and beyond most municipalities in their Covid-19 response. My only wish is that we could provide some loan guarantees for struggling businesses, but it's never easy to navigate around the state's Anti-Aid Amendment. What we really need are loan guarantees from the federal government so that creditors won't be beating down the doors of businesses/employers and property owners with mortgages. You can't expect to have rent forgiveness and/or delays based purely on acts of charity (though thankfully there has been a lot of that during this pandemic).

Perhaps the greatest civic spectacle of this past month was the brouhaha over the extension of City Manager Louis DePasquale's contract for an additional 18 months. The notion that you would extend the contract of a very competent and empathetic city manager in the midst of a pandemic would seem to be just about the easiest decision an elected official could make. Nonetheless, the contract was approved on a 6-3 vote only after several councillors expressed their "outrage" over such things as a delay in closing some streets, a temporary suspension of the mandatory "Bring Your Own Bag Ordinance" due to health concerns, and, of course, the Manager's continued skepticism about a proposed multi-hundred million dollar taxpayer investment in construction of a municipal broadband network. [I personally am hopeful that municipal broadband may prove to be a cost-effective initiative, but I certainly don't begin with that presumption.] I firmly believe that if these same councillors are in place in mid-2022 the choice of our next city manager will rest firmly on what comes across as superficially the most "progressive" in the inevitable tweets and other social media postings. Personally, I just want a manager with an empathetic soul who understands math and who values efficient delivery of city services.

Another Big Enterprise right now seems to be the call to review and/or change the City Charter for reasons that are about as clear as mud. Back when the Plan E Charter was established 80 years ago, it was runaway taxes, political patronage, and outright corruption that drove the campaign to move to a strong city manager form of government (with proportional representation elections). Apparently there are some councillors and activists who believe that charters are like underwear that needs to be changed now and then - just because. Personally I like the idea of reviewing the Charter if for no other reason than having the opportunity for more people to learn about it - and maybe to identify a few things that could be improved. Unfortunately, the rhetoric suggests that the main reason why some are pressing for charter change is that they want to invest more power in our part-time city councillors. One of our elected cuncillors even asserted that if a simple majority of councillors told the city manager to do something then he should simply do it without delay or question. This, of course, is a fundamental confusion between managed government and micromanagement. Our charter calls upon the elected councillors to pass ordinances, approve budgets, and set policies to guide the City administration. It's certainly not the role of the City Council to say who should be awarded contracts for services and who should be hired as a particular department head. If there's a problem in City government, it's more likely attributable to personal shortcomings than to governmental structure.

It was also noteworthy that one of the main ideas for charter change floated by some councillors at the Special Meeting called for this purpose was for an extension of their terms from two years to four years. I don't think that self-serving idea is going anywhare, but I think it says a lot about the councillors who floated the notion. We somehow managed to make it through 60 years out of 80 with the current Plan E Charter with councillors provided modest compensation for their part-time services and several staff people in the City Council office to assist with City Council orders, taking phone calls, and the like. In the last 20 years they have dramatically increased their salary, added now full-time aides, and even added their own dedicated parking spaces. Did the job suddenly grow so dramatically in these recent years? Is this current group somehow more skilled and burdened with greater responsibilities compared to years past? The Charter hasn't changed, so it's hard to make the case that the job has changed. Perhaps the one identifiable change is that some councillors now seem to be operating more like a taxpayer-funded political organizations than as an elected representatives whose primary job is to listen to residents and propose policies based on what they see and hear every day. - RW


Covid19 cases - Oct 19, 2020
1488 tested positive; 100 confirmed deaths (72 in long-term care facilities, 28 in general community)
Click on graph for latest Cambridge data

Cases
Oct 19, 2020 Breakdown of Cases (102 known current cases)

7 Day Average - New Cases

Harvard University COVID-19 data    MIT COVID-19 data


City of Cambridge Cancels City-Sponsored Halloween Events
Permits for community-sponsored events in public places will not be issued

Oct 13, 2020 – The City of Cambridge announced today that it is canceling all City-sponsored Halloween events and will not be issuing street closure, block party, or park permits this year for community events to help prevent large groups of trick-or-treaters and others from congregating in close proximity. City-sponsored events include annual Halloween open houses hosted by the Cambridge Fire Department and Halloween activities sponsored by the Department of Human Service Program’s Community Schools.City Seal

“Community celebrations are an important part of civic life in Cambridge; however, we must continue to adhere to COVID-19 safety measures. Traditional door to door trick-or-treating is a higher risk activity and I strongly encourage residents to consider safer alternatives,” said Cambridge City Manager Louis A. DePasquale. “We have a collective obligation this Halloween – and every day – to engage in behaviors that help Cambridge remain a lower risk community.

“Our decision to cancel the City’s annual Halloween events this year was not made lightly. We know this year has been hard on our residents, particularly families with younger children, and this is just one more sacrifice we are asking our families to make for the greater well-being, safety and health of our City,” says Mayor Siddiqui. “I encourage residents and families to celebrate Halloween through the variety of lower risk activities listed in the CDC guidelines.”

The City of Cambridge urges residents planning to celebrate Halloween to follow the guidance from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and to engage in only lower or moderate risk activities to minimize the risk of exposure to COVID-19. Halloween activities are subject to the current state gathering size limits as well as applicable any sector-specific workplace safety standards.

“We are asking residents to have a safe and fun Halloween this year and avoid higher risk activities,” said Claude A. Jacob, Chief Public Health Officer and director of the Cambridge Public Health Department. "Because the risk of COVID-19 transmission is greatest in indoors, we especially want to caution residents to avoid crowded indoor parties and haunted houses.”

Residents should stay home and refrain from Halloween activities, including handing out Halloween treats, if they feel unwell, have tested positive for COVID-19, have been exposed to someone with COVID-19, or have traveled to or from a state that is not classified as lower risk within the last 14 days.

According to the CDC, many traditional Halloween activities can be higher risk for spreading viruses. The CDC categorizes Halloween activities into higher, moderate, and lower risk activities. It is recommended to avoid higher-risk activities and consider engaging in only lower to moderate risk alternatives this year.City Hall - Halloween

Higher risk activities include:

Moderate risk activities include:

Lower risk activities include:

To sign up to receive updates on COVID-19, please visit the City’s dedicated information page: https://www.cambridgema.gov/covid19.


Fourth Amended Temporary Emergency Order Requiring the Wearing of Masks or Cloth Face Coverings

Oct 2, 2020 – The City of Cambridge has issued the Fourth Amended Temporary Emergency Order Requiring the Wearing of Masks or Cloth Face Coverings in All Public Places, Businesses, and Common Areas of Residential Buildings (the “October 2, 2020 Amended Mask Order”), which went into effect immediately.City Seal

The purpose of this amendment was to conform with state orders and to clarify an issue concerning common areas of residential buildings.

Specifically, the October 2, 2020 Amended Mask Order conforms to the latest requirements by the state concerning children and face coverings. The state requires face coverings for all persons over the age of 5 attending indoor or outdoor gatherings. The state also requires that children under the age of 2 not wear face coverings or masks. For children 2 years of age and older, a mask or face covering should be used, if possible. Mask use by children 2 years of age and up through the age of 5 is encouraged but should be at the discretion of the child’s parent or guardian at this time. In regard to common areas of residential buildings, the October 2, 2020 Amended Mask Order clarifies that in common areas, masks or cloth face coverings may be temporarily removed while eating or drinking when seated in outdoor seating areas, so long as a distance of at least six feet is maintained at all times.

The remaining provisions of the Third Amended Temporary Emergency Order Requiring the Wearing of Masks or Cloth Face Coverings in All Public Places, Businesses, and Common Areas of Residential Buildings, which went into effect today (Friday, October 2nd), remain in effect.


City of Cambridge Delays Transition to Step 2 of Phase III for Lower Risk Communities

Oct 2, 2020 – The City of Cambridge announced today that it will delay the City’s advancement to Step 2 of Phase III of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’s Reopening Plan. The Cambridge Commissioner of Public Health has determined that allowing Step 2 of Phase III of the Reopening Plan to commence in the City of Cambridge on October 5, 2020 will likely contribute to an increase in COVID-19 cases in the city and presents a public health risk for the residents of the city and those of neighboring communities.City Seal

“After consulting with the Commissioner of Public Health, Chief Public Health Officer, and the City’s COVID-19 Expert Advisory Panel, we are delaying Cambridge’s advancement to Step 2 Phase III,” said Cambridge Mayor Sumbul Siddiqui and City Manager Louis A. DePasquale in a joint statement. “Cambridge remains a low-risk community in part because we have taken a more conservative approach to reopening than the Commonwealth. Our priority is to keep our residents safe.”

“Before we advance the City to the next reopening step, we want to look closely at the impact on our current infection rate as residents start spending more time indoors during the fall months and as K-12 schools start reopening to in-person learning,” said Claude A. Jacob, Chief Public Health Officer and director of the Cambridge Public Health Department.

The average number of new infections in Cambridge has remained relatively stable since mid-July, but there has been a small uptick in cases in September compared to August. "We remain concerned about potential droplet or small particle transmission in indoor settings, especially at work places and other indoor sites with poor ventilation.”

As new COVID-19 infections continue to rise in Massachusetts, the City of Cambridge will continue to take a cautious and measured approach to further reopening activities and will continue to closely monitor public health data as part of its decision-making process.

View full text of the Temporary Emergency Order Concerning Gatherings in the City of Cambridge.

View full text of the Temporary Emergency Order Delaying Step 2 of Phase III of Governor Baker’s Reopening Plan in the City of Cambridge.

For more information and to sign up to receive updates on COVID-19, please visit the City’s dedicated information page: https://www.cambridgema.gov/covid19.


City of Cambridge Amends Temporary Emergency Restrictions on Public Meetings and Events
Halloween Guidance to be announced next week

Oct 2, 2020 – The City of Cambridge today announced that all City-sponsored community events, athletic events, events permitted for the use of City parks, or other City-sponsored public gatherings will be cancelled through October 26, 2020, or postponed to a later date. All prior approvals for events or gatherings are revoked. The City Manager’s Office is collaborating with the City’s COVID-19 Expert Advisory Panel, the Commissioner of Public Health, and the Cambridge Public Health Department to evaluate and determine what Halloween activities will be allowed in the City. Further guidance on Halloween activities in the City will be released next week.City Seal

City sponsored youth sports activities that take place in City parks or other City athletic facilities are permitted, subject to obtaining a City permit, and further subject to complying with all COVID-19 requirements and guidelines concerning youth sports issued by the State, which include but are not limited to requirements concerning social distancing, hygiene protocols, staffing and operations, and cleaning and disinfecting.

The meetings of the Board of Zoning Appeal, Conservation Commission, Historical Commission and Neighborhood Conservation Commissions, License Commission, Planning Board, Pole and Conduit Commission, and Election Commission are authorized to be held. Meetings will continue to be held virtually by utilizing web based technology that will stream audio and video – whenever possible -- of the meeting. All meetings will allow for remote participation by the members of the public body. All other public meetings of City committees, advisory groups, community meetings and the like shall remain cancelled and postponed until a later date, unless a meeting is determined necessary by the City.

All meetings of the City Council, including City Council Committee meetings, and all other City public bodies, boards and commissions that are governed by the state Open Meeting Law and transact official City business, other than quasi-judicial public bodies, boards and commissions, will follow the procedures defined in the City’s Amended Temporary Emergency Restriction on City Public Meetings, City Events, and City Permitted Events due to COVID-19, which is available on the City’s website.

Members of the public are reminded that they should maintain physical distancing of at least 6 feet from non-household members, and anyone over the age of five must wear a mask or face covering at all times when on or in public places. Public places include sidewalks, streets, parks, plazas, bus stops, non-residential parking lots and garages, and any other outdoor area or non-residential parking facility which is open and accessible to the general public.

The above temporary restrictions will remain in effect until October 26, 2020, or until further modified by the City Manager.

For more information and to sign up to receive updates on COVID-19, please visit the City’s dedicated information page: https://www.cambridgema.gov/covid19.


HOW TO BREAK A POLITICAL MACHINE
[Collier’s Magazine, January 31, 1948]

Cambridge’s Board of Directors, which replaced the old City Council after the professors finished their reform wave, has reduced the city debt from twelve to three million, built the highest-paid group of employees in any city of comparable size, reduced taxes and increased and streamlined all the city services

BY JOSEPH F. DINNEEN

The taxpayers of Cambridge, Massachusetts, were paying far too much for far too little until a group of college professors and plain citizens got together and took on the local political machine. It was a tough and glorious scrap, but today Cambridge is one of the best-run cities in the land

WE WANT you, Dean Landis, to become the active, working head of a committee to change the charter of the City of Cambridge." The dean of the Harvard Law School was sympathetic, but not interested. He looked at Attorney George McLaughlin and the committee sent to persuade him. "You want me to become a Cambridge city politician," he said, "and I have neither the time nor the inclination to do that. Why pick on me?"

"Because we need a big name. And we need somebody with your kind of ability to head up the fight."

Dean Landis shook his head. "Count me out. I have enough to do without trying to reform the City of Cambridge. Harvard and the city have been fighting for years."

"That's no reason why Harvard and the city should keep on fighting," McLaughlin persisted. "It's time they got together. If they don't, the city will go bankrupt and the professors who live here will find that just as tough as the rest of us. We have a plan to save it, but we want you to help us put it across."

"Why me? And what's the plan?" The plan which McLaughlin outlined on that day in July, 1938, was simple. But putting it into operation started one of the fanciest political slugging matches the old city across the Charles River had ever seen.

The reason McLaughlin had helped organize forty-nine professors, industrialists, merchants, legionnaires, white-collar workers and laborers into a Committee of Fifty to back the plan, was that they well knew the sad state into which the City of Cambridge had fallen: They had seen the firemen in discarded letter carriers' uniforms answering alarms with equipment so old it often broke down before it reached the fire; they had driven over the rutted and littered streets and had been stopped cold when unremoved snow made them impassable in winter; they had' smelled the city when garbage and refuse lay for days without being collected. And they had felt it in their pocketbooks as the taxes inched higher and higher.

The Committee of Fifty had been organized after the first move to correct these abuses had been taken by a team of Harvard experts in government and progressive Massachusetts legislators. This step had been to get the state legislature to pass an act allowing any city to adopt Plan E, the city-manager form of charter, if it voted to do so.

Previously this form of government, which had been pioneered in Cincinnati, Ohio, and had been replacing corrupt municipal machines with streamlined, efficient administration in various other cities throughout the country ever since, had been unavailable to Massachusetts cities. Now that Plan E was available, the Committee of Fifty proposed to arouse the citizens of Cambridge to the point where they'd toss out the city administration and charter and vote in a new order. They well knew that they had a fight ahead of them.

"Mayor John W. Lyons doesn't know yet that Plan E is poison to him and to all other political bosses," McLaughlin told Landis. "But as soon as we start working to get the people to vote for it, he will. His political machine will start rolling to kill it and he'll fight as he never fought before because Plan E means his finish."

Dean Landis accepted the job of heading the Committee of Fifty.

McLaughlin was right. Mayor Lyons, Paul Mannos, his chief contractor, who was being investigated by the district attorney and the members of the city council woke up screaming.

The first moves of the opposition made them laugh. James McCauley Landis was going around Cambridge, dropping in at taverns and saloons, chatting with truck drivers and bartenders, talking to them about Plan E, explaining it, discussing it, sounding them out. James Michael Landis, they called him, a comparison to James Michael Curley that they knew he would not like.

A Machine of Nonpoliticians

Nevertheless the new kind of machine that was growing in Cambridge bewildered Mayor Lyons. Its leaders were not politicians. None of them had ever been elected to public office; they were a collection of educators and businessmen swelled by an assortment of nobodies from all wards. They sponsored no candidate, but he knew they were out to defeat him. They didn't say so. They held political rallies, advocating the adoption of a new and fantastic form of city charter. Dean Landis, the three lawyer McLaughlins, George, Walter and Charles, were a flying squadron buzzing around to clubrooms, the Y.M.C.A. and church groups explaining it in detail, while speakers from the League of Women Voters were missionaries among the women.

Mayor Lyons examined the proposed city-charter and was astonished. It deprived a mayor of all power and made him merely the ceremonial head of the city. It would end a system of contract awards and city contractors. It would make the city council a board of directors of the city corporation and pay each one of them an unheard-of $4,000 a year. It did away with the system of marking a cross on a ballot and permitted every voter to vote for every candidate in a system known as proportional representation. The voter simply put a number one after his first choice, number two after the second and so on down the list.

It was election year and the proponents were trying to get the charter on the ballot. That required the signatures of 10 per cent of the voters —5,000 persons. The mayor and the city contractors were determined to keep it off the ballot at any cost.

"This is a bold and barefaced attempt to overturn our form of government," the mayor shouted from platforms and street-corner rostrums. "This is Communism. This system was designed in Moscow and approved by Stalin. This is a pernicious attempt by the Harvard Reds to destroy the American way."

The brothers McLaughlin, Charles, George and Walter (left to right), were ringleaders in the fight to organize a group which could oust the political machine. All lawyers, they handled their forces like generals

"There's nothing Communistic  about it," the McLaughlins, Dean Landis and a growing corps of speakers answered from the same and other platforms. "It was adapted from democratic systems in Ireland and England by Charles P. Taft to cure corruption and mismanagement in Cincinnati 15 years ago. He added American improvements and refinements and it put Cincinnati back on its feet." As Election Day came nearer, the fight became hot and bitter. Public speakers for Plan E making whirlwind campaign tours around the city came out of meeting places to find the air let out of their tires. A paving block was hurled through the window of the home of one of the speakers. But the Civic Association, which had grown out of the Committee of Fifty, kept on growing.

Already there were more than enough signatures to put on the ballot the question: "Shall Cambridge accept Plan E?" The signatures were filed as required with the State Ballot Law Commission, and verified. There was a deadline established by law —Saturday, October 8th, midnight— when all legal election forms must be completed in time to have ballots printed and distributed. Time was running out and suddenly the Committee of Fifty spotted an unintended booby trap in the state law covering referendums. This was a provision that "the city clerk upon the vote of the council" must transmit a petition for a referendum to the Secretary of State.

"How do we lick this one?" George McLaughlin asked the dean of the Law School. "How can we compel a hostile council to vote a proposal to wipe itself out?"

"A writ of mandamus?" the dean suggested.

"A writ of mandamus is an instrument to compel an official to do a purely administrative act, like making a police chief appoint a cop from a civil service list. Has a writ of mandamus ever been issued to compel a legislative body to pass a yes or no vote?" McLaughlin asked. "I doubt it."

"The courts never interfere with the legislative branch of the government, I'll agree," Landis said, "but in this case it can be argued. Is this particular vote a legislative or administrative act? You'll have to reason your way through that one."

On the Tuesday before deadline, the city council met and adjourned without taking any action on the petition. Its next regular meeting would not be held until the Tuesday after the deadline had passed; but Boston and Cambridge newspapers were so scornful and there was now such an impressive number of Plan E supporters throughout the city that the council became uneasy. The president of the council announced that he would call a special meeting to act on the petition on Friday, 24 hours before deadline.

On Friday the strategy of the opposition became clear. Groups of citizens appeared at the Ballot Law Commission to question the validity of signatures on the Plan E petition, alleging wholesale forgeries. The commission protested the lateness of the hour and inquired indignantly why the objections had not been made earlier; but the charges had to be investigated. The commission set ID o'clock next morning for a hearing.

That night the council met again and refused to vote to send the petition along to the Secretary of State.

"We couldn't," members said. "The petition is now in litigation. It may turn out to be invalid."

Writ of Mandamus Sought

There was a council of war in the cellar of George McLaughlin's house. "What do you suggest now?" McLaughlin asked Dean Landis. "You're the chairman of this committee."

"We'll go after the writ of mandamus."

"Good!" McLaughlin agreed. "I've been canvassing that possibility all week. I can't find a single important legal mind in Boston or Cambridge who thinks it can be done. They all say you can't get a writ of mandamus for that purpose and they all say there isn't time. The courts move too slow."

Landis nodded. "Let's speed them up."

Harvard Law School’s Dean Landis was a hard man to convince, but finally he got mad

Organization began right away. Judges were consulted and lawyers enlisted that night. At five o'clock the following morning, the three McLaughlins were in their office facing Suffolk County Courthouse in Boston typing out subpoenas for every person who filed an objection to signatures and for all thirteen members of the city council. There were two jurisdictions involved, Suffolk, which is Boston, and Middlesex, Cambridge. Fifteen lawyers with 15 constables attached were deployed in strategic places around the city, at the Statehouse, the two courthouses, in a district attorney's office, in drugstores by pay stations and in police stations.

It was their job to channel and chart the case through the Ballot Law Commission and all of the courts to the Supreme Court before the stroke of midnight. In the early morning hours, constables and lawyers were combing Cambridge picking up the objectors and city councilors, and by 10 o'clock that morning they had all been herded before the commission—all except those objectors who apparently lived on vacant lots or were unknown at the addresses given. Some who were awakened in their beds or were disturbed at breakfast didn't know what their objections were nor how to sustain them.

Justice on the Move

Three lawyers had been assigned to the Ballot Law Commission, and as they called witnesses, one by one their objections dissipated. By 11 o'clock in the morning, the petition was cleared and made legal. The wheels of justice had been speeded up as they never had been in local judicial history. While the ballot law hearing was going on, three more lawyers were piloting the petition for a writ of mandamus through to the courts.

According to the timetable, the court orders directing the councilors to appear should have been in Boston in time to serve them upon the city councilors as the Ballot Law Commission hearing broke up; but the orders were late, or the hearing ended too soon, and the councilors got away. Not far, though. The legal squadron knew where to pick them up from hour to hour.

By 1 o'clock the preliminary hearing on the writ of mandamus before a single justice was over, and he agreed to convene the full bench of the Supreme Court by 3 o'clock. Once again the three lawyers opposite the Boston courthouse began typing—this time turning out writs for the other 12 lawyers to serve on the councilors.

Harvard was playing Princeton that afternoon. Each Cambridge city councilor is entitled to two seats for every Harvard stadium game. As each councilor walked over the Larz Anderson Bridge that afternoon, a lawyer spotted him, pointed him out to his constable. The constable stepped up, saluted the councilor with "Greetings!" and slapped the writ in his hand.

At 3 o'clock a disappointed, dejected and bewildered city council was standing before Supreme Court Justice Dolan. The full bench had already reviewed the petition and Justice Dolan had been assigned to hear the arguments and dispose of the case. City Solicitor Richard C. Evarts, a good lawyer, represented the council, but he had had no time to prepare his case. Justice Dolan issued the writ directing the council to meet before midnight.

There was still one loophole. The councilors might refuse to hold a meeting because they had not been served legal notice of the court's order. Once again the typewriter battery of lawyers went to work, and that evening, while the councilors were home for dinner, notice was served upon each of them.

The council met at 7:30 that night, and although there was nothing the members could do but pass the order, they debated it for two and a half hours. The deadline was then two hours away and the order still had to be written and signed. The city clerk was a trustworthy and efficient official, but the eyes of a company of lawyers were upon him from the moment he received the document until he left the building. When he came out of City Hall to drive to the Statehouse, he found himself boxed on all sides by accompanying cars. The Plan E committee was taking no chances that something untoward might befall him. He arrived to deposit the document with the Secretary of State exactly 15 minutes before deadline.

Early in the morning after election, when the last vote had been counted. Dean Landis was sitting on a table in Plan E campaign headquarters, swinging his legs idly, drinking a cup of stale coffee from a near-by urn, looking down at the floor thoughtfully, surrounded by a group of disconsolate campaign workers. Plan E had lost.

"What do we do now?" one of them asked.

The dean got down from the table. "Now we start working to put this over two years from now. Get out the cards. Organize the mailing list. Announce the next meeting and arrange it. We lost fairly. We weren't counted out. We didn't have enough voles. Next time we'll have enough votes."

Before the next campaign had arrived, District Attorney Robert Bradford had closed in on Mayor Lyons and Contractor Mannos and sent them to jail for soliciting bribes, a conviction that helped make him governor. The Cambridge Civic Association had swelled to overwhelming proportions, and the campaign was even more bitter. On a night in late October, Dean Landis and George McLaughlin were sitting in an automobile on the fringe of an opposition rally, listening to a councilor plead and fight for votes. The councilor espied Landis and pointed him out to the crowd.

“There's Dean Landis in an automobile over there with Georgie McLaughlin," he said. "James Michael Landis. He came to me the other day and he said to me: 'If you'll support Plan E, I'll deliver to you the support of the Cambridge Civic Association,' and I said to him, 'No, Dean. You can't bribe me.' "

Accusation Stirs Landis

The dean was reaching for the door and at the same time shucking off his coat. "He can't get away with that," he said.

McLaughlin pulled him back. "Wait a minute! Cool off."

"He's a bar," the dean struggled to get loose.

"The people he's talking to know that. What are you going to do? Mix it up with him? Clip him on the chin? That'll give you a lot of personal satisfaction tonight, and tomorrow you'll be all over front pages for having a brawl with a candidate." The dean subsided and McLaughlin drove away.

Plan E won that year, and the following year the Civic Association put the plan into operation. The first board of directors, which took the place of the city council, hired as city manager John B. Atkinson, World War I veteran, Boston College graduate and an experienced executive in the shoe business. He had never been in politics and had never managed a city. The first thing he did was to throw all of the city contractors and hangers-on out of City Hall. Then he called all city employees before him.

"The city," he told them, "is now under new management. No city employee is going to be fired. From now on, you don't need any political influence to hold your job and political influence won't get you advancement or more money. What you're going to be paid depends upon what you do and how you do it. Everybody working for this city is getting a raise in pay right now. The cost of living is going up—and you need it—but you're going to earn it.

"From now on you're going to do all the work that has to be done in this city - including the work that has been done in the past by city contractors and subcontractors and their employees. From now on, you'll get a raise every year until you're the best-paid city employees in the country. From there on, the size of your salary is up to yourself."

The employees liked that. The local unions did not; but they couldn't do much about it. Atkinson needed a number of specialists in city administration and picked them among city employees, even sending them to colleges for special training. The new city road builders got their fundamental training in techniques in road building and surfacing at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, whose professors and instructors had a stake in Cambridge city government. He appointed college professors, specialists and instructors to nonpaying advisory posts. The city's postwar plan, advanced and ambitious, was designed by Professor Frederick J. Adams of MIT, who became the head of the Cambridge Planning Board.

During the past seven years every job done in Cambridge has been done by its own hired hands with this result: Since 1941 the city reduced its debt from $12,000,000 to $3,000,000, and at the same time raised the salaries of all of its city employees $1,300,000, actually making them the best paid in any city of comparable size in the world. It reduced its tax rate from $48 to $35.50 without raising the values of its taxable properties. While cutting the city's debt 75 per cent and reducing its tax rate—unheard of and considered to be impossible during war and postwar years when all costs were climbing—the city also did this:

Built eleven playgrounds and a new bathing beach; junked all of its obsolete fire-fighting and police equipment, replacing it with the latest and best apparatus obtainable, including the last word in two-way radio transmitters and receivers; modernized, re-equipped and enlarged its City Hospital, including the latest and most elaborate X ray; bought a fleet of sanitation trucks that are washed down daily and repainted white frequently; hired architects for G.I.s and built 1,200 modern housing units for them (not obsolete barracks, jerry-built shacks or Quonset huts); resurfaced more yards of streets in five years than all other cities of comparable size in 15 years.

Cambridge has its own printing plant, manned and operated by city employees. It prints everything for the city from stationery to books. It has its own photostat plant, which turns out copies of documents, plans and blueprints for city departments. The city incinerator was always an expensive loss, as was the garbage-disposal plant. The incinerator now pays the city a profit of $36,000 a year, while the garbage-disposal plant turns in a profit of $8,500. By businesslike methods, it increased the income of its City Hospital from $121,000 to $360,000 a year.

City employees do everything: painting, paper hanging, plumbing, repairing and building. The city furnishes the materials; the employees do the rest. Cambridge employs a staff of buyers who roam and scour the country picking up supplies in competition with contractors and private business. For $200,000 recently these roving purchasing agents picked up from Army and Navy surplus stores supplies that would otherwise cost $2,000,000.

The Cambridge City Corporation is hardboiled and tough with its debtors. Its crack law department collects every penny owed the city by the State of Massachusetts and by surrounding cities and towns in water, electric, transit and other tax adjustments. The law department fights rather than settles all doubtful claims against the city. For example, claims from people tripping over sidewalks have dropped from $48,000 a year to $15,000 a year because the city lawyers will fight the full distance to the Supreme Court if necessary. The city is just as tough with its own delinquent taxpayers and collects 99 per cent of its taxes from them. On last August 1st, it had less than one per cent miscellaneous taxes outstanding, and a phenomenal zero outstanding real-estate and personal taxes.

Speculators and Rent Gougers Hit

Valuations of homes, industrial and business establishments were left severely alone, except when speculators and rent gougers were involved. When a man sold for $12,000 a place that was worth $2,500 on the city's tax books, they looked into it right away. If it was worth $12,000 to the new buyer it was worth almost that to the tax collector and the speculator was promptly slugged with the new tax bill. If a property owner raised rents, he was treated the same way. New businesses and new industries have been crowding Cambridge so fast that it's a problem to find quartet's for them.

The city doesn't borrow any long-term money. It saves the interest. Its credit is probably better than that of any other city in the country.

Cambridge has become a phenomenal experiment in city government. The resources and laboratories of MIT test all of its building and road materials, equipment and machinery. Problems in physical improvement are for MIT students to solve. The Littauer School of Government, with Professor Morris Lambie as adviser, helps on problems of government and city betterment.

Hand in glove with the Civic Association is the Cambridge Research Association to examine all aspects of city government. Dr. Karl T. Compton, president of MIT, his administrative assistant, Robert Kimball, and Bernice Cronkhite, former dean of Radcliffe College, are members of the board of directors of the Research Association while President James Bryant Conant of Harvard is an ordinary, dues-paying member of the Civic Association.

Meetings of the Civic Association are almost unbelievable. A federal judge sits between a truck driver, and a housemaid, and a professor of archaeology drapes himself over a radiator next to a cop.

The old system dies hard, but in Plan E, according to Professor Lambie, the entrenched politician skilled in yesteryear's technique can see the curtain falling on the city-boss type of government. "A political machine can't operate under Plan E," says Lambie. "Good or bad government originates with the people of any community, but the fact that the people of a community want good government doesn't mean that they'll get it. They'll get good government only if there is a charter and an election system in power through which they can function."

THE END


Cambridge Launches Abbreviated Participatory Budgeting Cycle

Sept 1, 2020 – Cambridge City Manager Louis A. DePasquale announced today that the City’s 7th Participatory Budgeting cycle is now underway. Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the limitations on conducting in-person events and community engagement activities, the City is running an abbreviated version of Participatory Budgeting. This year’s cycle will be conducted as a half cycle, and a future Participatory Budgeting cycle will be conducted at an expanded level.Participatory Budgeting

Participatory Budgeting is a process where community members directly decide how to spend part of a public budget. During this year’s cycle, Cambridge residents ages 12 and older will be able to vote on how to spend $500,000 on City capital projects. This multi-month process begins with the idea collection phase, which will run from September 1 through September 30. The proposal development process is scheduled to run into December, and voting will begin in December 2020.

“Participatory Budgeting has become a vital community-building tool that directly involves residents in the City’s budgeting process,” said Cambridge City Manager Louis DePasquale. “Since the program’s inception, Participatory Budgeting has helped ensure that the City’s Capital Plan reflects the priorities of Cambridge residents. Even with the current economic uncertainty, I believe the City must continue this important community engagement initiative.”

“This year’s process will look somewhat different than in past years,” said Cambridge Budget Director Taha Jennings. “As we continue to adapt to the evolving impact COVID-19 is having on society, we have had to shorten the timeframe for the process. We felt it was important to make every effort to continue the Participatory Budgeting process this year and we are looking forward to an expanded community-driven process once we can safely resume in-person engagement and events.”

The Cambridge community has directly voted on how to spend $4.75 million since the inaugural FY16 Participatory Budgeting cycle.

For additional information or to submit ideas, please visit pb.cambridgema.gov, email pb@cambridgema.gov, or call the Budget Office at 617-349-4270. Ideas can also be dropped off in the Payment Drop Box in the rear of City Hall or mailed to the City of Cambridge Budget Office, 795 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge MA 02139.


CIVIC CALENDAR (abridged)

Tues, Oct 20

6:00pm   School Committee Virtual Meeting  (webcast from Attles Meeting Room, CRLS)

The next Regular Meeting of the School Committee will be held on Tues, Oct 6 at 6:00pm held in and broadcast from the Dr. Henrietta S. Attles Meeting Room, CRLS for the purpose of discussing any and all business that may properly come before the Committee.

6:30pm   Planning Board meeting  (Remote Meeting - web only)
Register for Zoom Webinar to participate in real time (before or during the meeting). Check your e-mail (including spam/junk folder) for confirmation.

General Business

1. Update from the Community Development Department

2. Adoption of Planning Board meeting transcripts (9/15/2020; 9/22/2020)

Public Hearings

6:30pm   PB# 367
325 Binney Street –Special Permit application by ARE-MA Region No. 61, LLC to construct a 370,462 gross square foot technical office building pursuant to Section 19.20 Project Review Special Permit and Section 20.1000 Grand Junction Overlay District. (Notice) (Materials)

General Business

3. PB-330 55
Wheeler Street – Design Update (Materials)

Wed, Oct 21

2:00pm   The City Council's Ordinance Committee will conduct a public hearing on the Harvard Square Conservation District Study Committee Report.  (Sullivan Chamber - Televised)

2:30pm   Cambridge Election Commission meeting  (51 Inman Street, Remote Participation via ZOOM)
The meeting may be viewed by the public at this Zoom Link.

I. MINUTES

II. REPORTS

1. Executive Director's Report

2. Assistant Director's Report

3. Commissioners' Reports

III. PUBLIC COMMENT

IV. ACTION AGENDA

Old Business

1. 2020 State Election, Tuesday, November 3rd
- Early Voting Update

New Business

5:30pm   Cambridge Redevelopment Authority Board Meeting  (Police Station, First Floor Conference Room, 125 Sixth St.)

Thurs, Oct 22

5:30pm   The City Council's Housing Committee will conduct a public hearing to receive an update from the Community Development Department and the Affordable Housing Trust Fund on potential changes made to the eligibility preferences for the Inclusionary Housing program.  (Sullivan Chamber - Televised)

Mon, Oct 26

5:30pm   City Council meeting  (Sullivan Chamber - Televised)

Tues, Oct 27

6:00pm   School Committee Virtual Roundtable Meeting  (webcast from Attles Meeting Room, CRLS)

There will be a Roundtable Meeting of the School Committee on Tues, Oct 27 at 6:00pm, held in and broadcast from the Dr. Henrietta S. Attles Meeting Room, CRLS, 459 Broadway, for the purpose of discussing the opportunities and challenges of this exceptional year with all elementary school principals. It is anticipated this meeting will end no later than 8:00pm.

The Roundtable will be live-streamed at www.cpsd.us and broadcast on Cambridge Educational Access TV (CEATV) Channel 98/99, as usual.

Wed, Oct 28

5:30pm   The City Council's Ordinance Committee will conduct a public hearing to discuss the Real Estate Transfer Home Rule Petition.  (Sullivan Chamber - Televised)

6:00pm   School Committee Special Education and Students Supports Sub-Committee Virtual Meeting  (webcast)
There will be a Virtual Meeting of the Special Education and Student Supports Sub-Committee on Wed, Oct 28 at 6:00pm for the purpose of reviewing and discussing the OSS safety manual and OSS school coordination and collaboration. It is anticipated this meeting will end by or before 8:00pm.

Mon, Nov 2

5:30pm   City Council meeting  (Sullivan Chamber - Televised)

Tues, Nov 3

7:00am-8:00pm   Election Day  (All 34 Precincts will be open from 7:00am to 8:00pm for in person voting)