Cambridge City Council meeting - October 15, 2012

Cambridge City Council meeting - October 15, 2012 - AGENDA

[Councillor Cheung was ABSENT]

CITY MANAGER’S AGENDA
1. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of the Massachusetts Formula Grant in the amount of $101,710 funded by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs to the Grant Fund Department of Human Service Programs Salary and Wages account ($54,708), to the Other Ordinary Maintenance account ($45,277), and to the Travel and Training account ($1,725) which will be used to provide substance abuse prevention services for Cambridge seniors, transportation for Cambridge seniors to medical appointments, and weekly food shopping trips.

2. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of the Mount Auburn Hospital Grant in the amount of $7,068 to the Grant Fund Human Services Salary and Wages account ($6,568) and to the Other Ordinary Maintenance account ($500) which will be used to support one ESOL class and its related services for employees at the Mount Auburn Hospital provided by the Community Learning Center.

3. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of the Points of Entry Grant for $13,000 funded by the Open Society Foundation through Kratos Learning Solutions, to the Grant Fund Human Service Programs Salary and Wages account ($7,657), to the Other Ordinary Maintenance account ($5,193), and to the Travel and Training account ($150) which will support individual and group career counseling, workshops, integrated curriculum, expanded learning time, and distance learning at the Community Learning Center (CLC).

4. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of the Project Bread Food Pantry grant received from the Project Bread organization for $7,225 to the Grant Fund Human Services Other Ordinary Maintenance account which were awarded to the Cambridge Senior Center Food Pantry by Project Bread to pay for purchases at the Greater Boston Food Bank, other food purchases for our Senior Food Pantry, as well as food for senior activities and events at the Senior Center.

5. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to the appointment of the following person as a member of the Cambridge Water Board for a term of five years effective Oct 1, 2012: James C. Tanner, Jr.

Oct 15, 2012
To the Honorable, the City Council:

I am hereby transmitting notification of the appointment of James C. Tanner, Jr. as a member of the Cambridge Water Department for a five year term effective Oct 1, 2012.

Mr. Tanner currently works for IBM with a broad range of work experience in technical projects, operations, management, customers and sales. He has been on many private business boards and has developed policies as part of his work experience. Mr. Tanner has the time, inclination and desire to serve the City of Cambridge as a Water Board member and will compliment the current Water Board members.

Very truly yours, Robert W. Healy, City Manager

6. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to an appropriation of $600,000 from Free Cash to the Public Investment Fund Finance Department (Information Technology) Extraordinary Expenditures Account to address planning for future innovation as well as some critical technology infrastructure needs.

7. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $2,000,000 from Free Cash to the Public Works Department Public Investment Fund Extraordinary Expenditures Account for the first phase of the LED Street Light conversion project.

CHARTER RIGHT
1. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the City Solicitor, the License Commission, and all other relevant parties to drop the City's lawsuit regarding Uber and Uber-like smartphone technology, and constructively move forward with revisions to city ordinances that allow new technologies such as Uber to function within the city. [Charter Right exercised by Councillor Decker on Order Number Four of Oct 1, 2012.]
Placed on file under Rule 19 - no action taken (after Executive Session on the subject)

ON THE TABLE
2. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 12-09, regarding a report on the use of coal and on Cambridge becoming coal-free. [City Manager Agenda Number One of Mar 5, 2012 Placed on Table on motion of Vice Mayor Simmons on Mar 5, 2012.]

3. Urge greater cooperation from the Cambridge Housing Authority to better serve the people of Cambridge. [Order Number Two of Apr 9, 2012 Placed on Table on motion of Vice Mayor Simmons on Apr 9, 2012.]

4. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the Community Development Department and other relevant departments in order to present to the City Council a map of Cambridge that shows, by location and by date, all of the areas where construction is and will be taking place over the coming decade. [Order Number Four of Apr 9, 2012 Placed on Table on motion of Councillor Toomey on Apr 9, 2012.]

5. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item No. 12-28, regarding temporary ramps and obstructions in construction zones. [City Manager Agenda Number Eight of Apr 23, 2012 Placed on Table on motion of Councillor Kelley on Apr 23, 2012.]

6. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 12-35, which requests a report on whether there were any public safety officers that falsified their emergency medical training re-certification while employed by the City of Cambridge. [Charter Right exercised by Councillor Toomey on City Manager Agenda Number Two of May 21, 2012. Placed on Table on motion of Councillor Toomey on June 4, 2012.]

7. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 12-63 regarding a report on safety issues at the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Vassar Street. [City Manager Number Twenty-three of July 30, 2012 Placed on Table on motion of Councillor Kelley on July 30, 2012.]

8. That the City Manager is requested to confer with relevant City staff and report back to the City Council on whether a tagging program could be implemented to notify owners of bicycles that have been removed from sign posts by the Department of Public Works and contact information for retrieval of said bicycle. [Order Number Fourteen of July 30, 2012 Placed on Table on motion of Councillor vanBeuzekom on July 30, 2012. Councillor Toomey recorded in the negative on Tabling.]

APPLICATIONS AND PETITIONS
1. An application was received from Touch Gallery requesting permission to reface a pre-existing nonconforming sign at the premises numbered 281 Concord Avenue. Approval has been received from Inspectional Services, Department of Public Works and Community Development Department.

2. An application was received from Grolier Poetry Book Shop requesting permission for a sandwich board sign on the corner of Massachusetts Avenue and Plympton Street.

3. An application was received from Boston Classical Soo Bahk Do requesting permission for a sandwich board sign in front of the premises numbered 7 Temple Street.

COMMUNICATIONS
1. A communication was received from 520 Mass. Ave. Trust, et al., transmitting written protest to the Susan Yanow, et al. Zoning Petition.

2. A communication was received from Massachusetts Institute of Technology transmitting written protest to the Susan Yanow, et al. Zoning Petition.

3. A communication was received from Peter Valentine, 37 Brookline Street regarding establishing a yearly citywide yard sale and Main Street and parks sale.

4. A communication was received from Stone River Properties LLC transmitting written protest to the Susan Yanow, et al. Zoning Petition.

5. A communication was received from Staci Rubin, Staff Attorney, Alternatives for Community & Environment (ACE) regarding DOT Study to determine the impact on the public safety of transporting ethanol by train, Section 24 of Chapter 242 of the Acts of 2012.

6. A communication was received from Victoria Bergland, ACT Public Housing Co-Chair and Cheryl-Ann Pizza-Zeoli, ACT Voucher Co-Chair (Alliance of Cambridge Tenants) regarding the City Manager's appointment to the Cambridge Housing Authority Board of Commissioners.

7. A communication was received from L-Z Realty Trust, et al., transmitting written protest to the Susan Yanow, et al. Zoning Petition.

8. A communication was received from Dieulene Charles, 30 Newtowne Court relating to working conditions at Le Meridien Hotel.

9. A communication was received from John A. Hawkinson, Staff Reporter, Massachusetts Institute of Technology regarding City Manager Agenda Item Number Six.

RESOLUTIONS
1. Resolution on the death of Alice (Vieira) Nicolau. Councillor Toomey

2. Resolution on the death of Manuel F. Martins. Councillor Toomey

3. Retirement of Diane Bourdeau from the School Department. Mayor Davis

4. Retirement of Mark Berry from the Cambridge Housing Authority. Mayor Davis

5. Resolution on the death of Aja Pascual. Councillor Reeves

6. Congratulations to Jason and Joanna Alves on the birth of their son Sawyer Anthony Alves. Councillor Toomey, Mayor Davis

7. Resolution on the death of Augustus J. Regal Jr. Councillor Maher

8. Congratulating St. Peter's Episcopal Church on the occasion of the 170th anniversary. Mayor Davis

9. Resolution on the death of Virginia M. Duffy. Councillor Maher

10. Resolution on the death of Edward J. Burke, Jr. Councillor Maher

11. Resolution on the death of Harold F. Coyne, Sr. Councillor Maher

12. Resolution on the death of Anne Mulroy. Councillor Toomey

13. Congratulating Veronica vanBeuzekom and Adam Mohammed on the birth of their son, Erik Amar Mohazekom. Mayor Davis

14. Congratulating the 2012 Cambridge Food Hero David Leslie. Mayor Davis

15. Congratulating the 2012 Cambridge Food Hero Steve Johnson. Mayor Davis

16. Congratulating the 2012 Cambridge Food Heroes Jose Wendel and Dawn Olcott. Mayor Davis

17. Congratulating the 2012 Cambridge Food Hero Maryellen Carvello. Mayor Davis

18. Congratulating the 2012 Cambridge Food Hero Jane Hirschi. Mayor Davis

19. Congratulations to Boston City Councilor Ayanna Pressley on her engagement to Conan Harris. Vice Mayor Simmons

20. Resolution on the death of Maryetta (Peters) Whitehead. Councillor Toomey

21. Speedy recovery wishes to Charles Cnudde. Vice Mayor Simmons

22. Happy 90th Birthday wishes to Little Joe Cook. Councillor Reeves

23. Resolution on the death of Anne L. (Cunha) Scott. Councillor Toomey

24. Resolution on the death of Norman Lee "Big Daddy" Perkins. Councillor Toomey

25. Resolution on the death of Theresa C. (D'Amore) Harris. Councillor Maher

26. Resolution on the death of Jacqulyn M. McCann. Councillor Maher

27. Congratulations to Harry Belafonte on receiving the Desmond Tutu Social Justice Award at the Annual Gathering of South African Partners. Councillor Reeves

28. Welcome the Dalai Lama to the City of Cambridge. Mayor Davis

29. Congratulations and best wishes to Pentecostal Tabernacle on the occasion of its 85th Church Anniversary Celebration. Councillor Toomey

30. Thanks to KaBoom! and Procter & Gamble/Gillette for their service in building a playground at the Margaret Fuller Neighborhood House. Councillor Toomey

31. Congratulations to Carol Fulp on receiving the 2012 Corporate Citizens Award from the South African Partners. Councillor Reeves

ORDERS
1. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the Assistant City Manager of Community Development and to work with the Cambridge Redevelopment Authority and MassDOT to ensure that the multi-use path is incorporated into the plans for Innovation Boulevard. Councillor Toomey

2. That the City Council instruct the City Manager and all City departments to boycott the services provided by HEI Le Meridien Cambridge Hotel. Councillor Reeves and Vice Mayor Simmons

3. That the City Manager work together with the Assessing Department and all other relevant parties to explore the feasibility of granting small commercial properties a modest exemption on their real estate property taxes and report back to the City Council. Councillor vanBeuzekom and Councillor Toomey
Referred to Finance Committee

4. That the City Manager work together with all relevant parties to dedicate a revolving fund that finances interest-free loans for energy-efficiency improvements and/or onsite energy generation for property owners and report back to the City Council. Councillor vanBeuzekom and Mayor Davis
Referred to Finance Committee

5. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Peace Commission to initiate the process for Cambridge to join the Compassionate Action Network as a Compassionate City. Mayor Davis

COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. A communication was received from Donna P. Lopez, Interim City Clerk, transmitting a report from Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair of the Public Safety Committee, for a public meeting held on Aug 6, 2012 to continue discussions on the MIT Nuclear Reactor and related public safety concerns, long-term planning and associated issues.
Charter Right - Kelley

2. A communication was received from Donna P. Lopez, Interim City Clerk, transmitting a report from Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair of the Public Safety Committee, for a public meeting held on July 17, 2012 to discuss the jurisdiction of non-Cambridge Police Department law enforcement organizations including Harvard, MIT, State and MBTA Police and Health Alliance, special security personnel and out of town officers on construction details.
Charter Right - Kelley

3. A communication was received from Donna P. Lopez, Interim City Clerk, transmitting a report from Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair of the Public Safety Committee, for a public meeting held on Aug 13, 2012 to discuss security cameras.

HEARING SCHEDULE
Mon, Oct 15
5:00pm Special Presentation "Cambridge welcomes Felipe Tobar and Ana Navarrete - community leaders of our Sister City San Jose Las Flores, El Salvador" (Sullivan Chamber)
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Tues, Oct 16
3:00pm The Housing Committee will conduct a public meeting to discuss the expiring use agreement for University Park and to receive an update from Boston Properties on their commitment to build affordable housing in Kendall Square. (Sullivan Chamber)

Fri, Oct 19
10:00am The Government Operations and Rules Committee will conduct a public meeting to discuss Community Benefits. (Ackermann Room)

Mon, Oct 22
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Tues, Oct 23
10:00am The Housing Committee will conduct a public meeting to receive an update on plans to sell 2 Mount Auburn Street. (Sullivan Chamber)

Wed, Oct 24
4:00pm The Ordinance Committee will conduct a public hearing on the petition of the Planning Board to amend the Zoning Map for an area along North Massachusetts Avenue in the vicinity of Trolley Square and Linear Park from Business A-2 to Residence C-2B. This hearing to be televised. (Sullivan Chamber)
5:30pm The Government Operations and Rules Committee will conduct a public meeting to discuss the visioning process for the City of Cambridge and the City Manager search. (Sullivan Chamber)

Thurs, Oct 25
2:00pm The Public Facilities, Arts and Celebrations Committee will conduct a public meeting to discuss urban festivals and the role of festivals in civic life and economic development. (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Oct 29
5:30pm Roundtable Meeting between City Council and School Committee to receive an update on the Innovation Agenda. No public comment. No votes will be taken. Meeting will not be televised. (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Nov 5
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Thurs, Nov 15
5:00pm The Environment Committee will conduct a public meeting to discuss the Cambridge Public Schools FY12 Sustainability Year-in-Review Report and Cambridge's Green Purchasing Policies. (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Nov 19
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Nov 26
5:30pm Roundtable Meeting. No public comment. No votes will be taken. Meeting will not be televised. (Sullivan Chamber)

Thurs, Nov 29
2:30pm Public Facilities, Arts and Celebrations Committee (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Dec 3
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Dec 10
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Dec 17
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Dec 31
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Jan 7
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Thurs, Jan 10
2:00pm Public Facilities, Arts and Celebrations Committee (Location - TBA)

Mon, Jan 14
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Jan 28
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Feb 4
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Feb 11
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Feb 25
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Mar 4
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Mar 11
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Mar 18
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Apr 1
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Apr 8
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Apr 22
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

Mon, Apr 29
5:30pm City Council Meeting (Sullivan Chamber)

TEXT OF ORDERS
O-1 Oct 15, 2012
COUNCILLOR TOOMEY
WHEREAS: It has come to the attention of the City Council that there was a public meeting on Oct 11, 2012 with the Massachusetts Department of Transportation and the Cambridge Redevelopment Authority regarding the plans for Innovation Boulevard; and
WHEREAS: Innovation Boulevard is a parcel of land located along Galileo Galilei Way between Broadway and Main Streets along the Grand Junction Rail Way; and
WHEREAS: The proper development of this parcel in integral to the construction of a multi-use pathway; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the Assistant City Manager of Community Development and to work with the Cambridge Redevelopment Authority and MassDOT to ensure that the multi-use path is incorporated into the plans for Innovation Boulevard.

O-2 Oct 15, 2012
COUNCILLOR REEVES
VICE MAYOR SIMMONS
WHEREAS: In March 2012, over 70% of the workers at the non-union HEI Le Meridien Cambridge hotel raised concerns about their workloads, salaries, healthcare and quality of guest services with hotel management; and
WHEREAS: Since then, management has shifted a greater portion of healthcare costs onto its workers; and
WHEREAS: On Oct 11, 2012, a large number of workers at the hotel are publicly calling for a consumer boycott of their own hotel and over 200 Local 26 members and community members are rallying and marching in support of a boycott of the hotel; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Council instruct the City Manager and all City departments to boycott the services provided by HEI Le Meridien Cambridge Hotel; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Council, which normally holds its festivities at Le Meridien-MIT every other year following its swearing-in ceremony, vows to boycott the hotel for this and all other functions until it has been confirmed that HEI changes its practices and treats its workers with the dignity and respect they deserve; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Clerk be and hereby is requested to forward a suitably engrossed copy of this resolution to the management of the HEI Le Meridien Cambridge Hotel & Resorts' local corporate office in Norwalk, CT and Local 26.

O-3 Oct 15, 2012
COUNCILLOR VANBEUZEKOM
COUNCILLOR TOOMEY
WHEREAS: The City of Cambridge is dedicated to both promoting business endeavors within Cambridge and strengthening small local businesses specifically; and
WHEREAS: Massachusetts state law [G.L. c. 59, § 5I] adopted in 2000 allows the Cambridge City Council to grant a modest real estate exemption to commercial properties that are occupied by businesses with an average annual employment of no more than 10 people, an assessed valuation of less than $1,000,000, and other criterion; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to work together with the Assessing Department and all other relevant parties to explore the feasibility of granting small commercial properties a modest exemption on their real estate property taxes and report back to the City Council.

O-4 Oct 15, 2012
COUNCILLOR VANBEUZEKOM
MAYOR DAVIS
WHEREAS: The City of Cambridge is committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions and actively encourages the residents of Cambridge to participate in programs that make their homes and businesses more energy-efficient; and
WHEREAS: The city has made available to the public a map that shows solar rooftop potential throughout the city and both the city and its residents can benefit by creating more onsite energy generation through solar hot water collectors and photovoltaic panel systems; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to work together with all relevant parties to dedicate a revolving fund that finances interest-free loans for energy-efficiency improvements and/or onsite energy generation for property owners and report back to the City Council; and be it further
ORDERED: That this new City of Cambridge program be evaluated in the context of national legislation called P.A.C.E. (Property Assessed Clean Energy) Program.

O-5 Oct 15, 2012
MAYOR DAVIS
WHEREAS: The Dalai Lama is visiting Cambridge on Tuesday, October 16, 2012; and
WHEREAS: The Dalai Lama has inspired a Compassionate Action Network (CAN) comprised of self-organizing groups who share a common vision for a compassionate world. The Dalai Lama Center for Peace and Education and CAN are both partner organizations of the Charter for Compassion; and
WHEREAS: The CAN project encourages mayors and governments across the world to affirm the Charter for Compassion and proclaim support of a 10-year Compassionate City Campaign; and
WHEREAS: Among the Compassionate Cities are Seattle, Washington; Appleton, Wisconsin; Basalt, Colorado; Lake County, California; London, Ontario; Millbrae, California; Louisville, Kentucky and Gaziantep, Turkey; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to direct the Peace Commission to investigate the process for Cambridge to join the Compassionate Action Network as a Compassionate City and report back to the entire City Council and the City Clerk's Office.

TEXT OF COMMITTEE REPORTS
Committee Report #1
The Public Safety Committee held a public meeting on Aug 6, 2012 beginning at 5:31pm in the Sullivan Chamber.

The purpose of the meeting was to continue discussions on the MIT Nuclear Reactor and related public safety concerns, long-term planning and associated issues.

Present at the meeting were Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair of the Committee; Councillor Leland Cheung; Councillor Minka vanBeuzekom; Vice Mayor E. Denise Simmons; Councillor Timothy J. Toomey, Jr.; Richard Rossi, Deputy City Manager; Gerard Mahoney, Cambridge Deputy Fire Chief/Emergency Management; Sam Lipson; and Interim City Clerk Donna P. Lopez.

Also present were Dr. David Moncton, Director, Nuclear Reactor Laboratory (NRL) MIT; Sarah Gallop, Co-Director, Office of Government and Community Relations, MIT; Bill McCarthy, NRL Radiation Protection Officer, Office of Environmental Health and Safety; Tom Newton, Associate Director, Reactor Engineering, MIT; Brad Bellows, 87 Howard Street; James Williamson, 1000 Jackson Place; James Herms, 14 Lawrence Street; and John Hopkins.

Councillor Kelley convened the meeting and explained the purpose.

Councillor Kelley stated that several meetings have been held on the MIT Nuclear Reactor. Cambridge is unique for having a small research reactor in the City and that the reactor's location in such a dense, valuable, populated area makes its ongoing activities, to include site security, disaster planning, refueling, fuel storage and so forth, worthy of on-going discussions. His goal is to have an ongoing conversation on the phase out of highly enriched uranium, the relicensing of the nuclear reactor and long term plans for the facility. He asked MIT to give an overview of the reactor facility which is now licensed for another 21 years.

Sarah Gallop informed the committee that a dialogue has been ongoing for more than a year on the MITR. MIT has had a dialogue with Mr. Bellows and a lot of questions have been answered. Dr. Moncton has provided a copy of the presentation for this meeting for the record (ATTACHMENT A).

Dr. Moncton stated that he is pleased with the excellent working relationship MIT has with the City departments. He spoke about the safety at the reactor. MIT operates the reactor to conduct research in areas such as reactor safety, not to provide power. The reactor can be shut down and be put into a benign situation. MIT operates on the principal of best business practices. There are 64 video cameras that monitor the reactor. The systems are at a higher level than required by the NRC. The nuclear engineering in MIT provides important information. MIT invented the risk evaluation criteria used today. The presence of the MITR attracts students to MIT for the study of nuclear engineering programs, without which these students would not come to MIT. MIT provides the employees for nuclear engineering around the world. MITR is the only academic reactor to provide research capabilities and its nuclear program is one of the world's best. Three experiments can be done at one time. MITR is 54 years old and has had no accidents, no public exposure and no environmental releases above de minimus levels.

Dr. Moncton spoke about relicensing. MITR received a license in fall of 2010 for 20 years. There are no definite plans for the end of the 20 years. He hopes the nuclear engineer community would build more reactors that would overtake the capabilities of the MITR so that the MITR would no longer be unique. It is too early to predict the plans for the future. He is surprised how valuable the reactor is. No plans to build a new reactor or to continue this reactor.

Councillor Kelley inquired when MIT thinks about relicensing or not to licensing the reactor. Dr. Moncton stated that this reactor can be shut down immediately and then it can be decommissioned over a period of a few years. MIT has set aside funds, $32 million, in the endowment to decommission the reactor.

Councillor Kelley inquired about the phase out of highly enriched uranium (HEU).

Dr. Moncton stated that MIT is enthusiastic to use LEU, which would be the replacement for HEU. He spoke about the proliferation risk. Curtailing use of civilian HEU is MIT's goal. There are 5 reactors that use LEU. If MIT converts successfully to NEU it will incentivize other reactor conversions. MIT would like to convert as soon as possible. The conversion date is 2016. He is concerned whether the 2016 date will be met, but conversion is a Department of Energy (COE) issue.

Councillor Kelley questioned the threat of rising sea level, the risk to storm surges and the location of the reactor. Dr. Moncton stated that sea level rising is happening and there is a minor increase in flooding. Cambridge has sufficient drainage to the Charles River. He does not see any risk from flooding. The reactor can be shut down quickly and there is no risk to public. There is no breaching issue. Councillor Kelley stated that drains go out of building; a breach is about what comes into building. Dr. Moncton responded that the reactor is well above grade. Councillor Kelley stated that he would like a site visit to the MITR. Mr. Rossi stated that the City is about to enter a contract for a climate change feasibility, to include a city survey, and will have MIT included in the study.

Councillor Kelley asked who impacts the red zone as well as the supplies in transit. Dr. Moncton stated that LEU is a new fuel and is not radioactive. No inventory of HEU is kept on site. This was his policy. The HEU is delivered to the facility and then put into the core when it becomes highly radioactive. It is highly unlikely that the radioactive fuel could be made into a nuclear weapon as it is difficult to weaponize or handle. There is a safe situation for the HEU. MIT wants to convert to LEU. He spoke about the safety of shipping the fuel. He stated that no fresh fuel is kept on site and when it comes out it is put into a safety container. Dr. Moncton stated that spent fuel are kept for 12-18 months and then shipped out. Fresh HEU is not very dangerous- MIT would like to convert to LEU not because of a terrorist threat but because of MIT's leadership role in the area.

Councillor Kelley asked about the threat of direct attack on the reactor. Most reactors are not in a place as dense as Cambridge. What preparation is taken to prevent a threat of an attack? Dr. Moncton stated that Councillor Kelley had to be more specific. A safeguard discussion may be a topic for another meeting. If an airplane hit the reactor a lot of people would lose their life. He spoke about the physical integrity of the MITR. The reactor could withstand an Oklahoma City type of attack but MIT cannot protect itself from aerial threats. Councillor Kelley asked how robust the internal defenses, both physical and human are. Dr. Moncton stated that there is a small inventory of fuel. To disperse it in a fine powder form it would require an enormous explosion. The shock wave would be absorbed and the core would be protected from a physical breach. However, it would level a couple of City blocks. In Japan's recent release, no one received a radiation dose that showed an increase in cancer. Dislocation from family and home caused more problems with depression than health problems associated with radiation. The radiation involved there was 5,000 times higher than the MIT reactor. There are exaggerated notions of the danger associated with the reactor. Councillor Kelley stated that scheduling future meetings will be held by this committee to understand the issues so that answers can be intelligent when asked.

Councillor Kelley stated that from a proactive standpoint that 2016 is the date for the phase out. Dr. Moncton spoke about the conversion to LEU. The Department of Energy ships the fuel to MITR in such a small amount that a terrorist would need a long time, perhaps 10 shipment seizures, to store up a sufficient amount for it to be a threat. Only one truck ships the fresh fuel. Gerard Mahoney stated that the Cambridge Fire Department (CFD) enjoys a proactive relationship with Dr. Moncton. All personnel in the CFD have been given familiarization tours of the MITR. He has had a least 6 tours. MIT has provided training for CFD and this training has taken place out of state. The scenario of a truck bomb similar to Oklahoma City he stated that there would be more concern with the damage to the structures across the street due to the gasoline in those structures.

At 6:25 PM Councillor Kelley opened the meeting to public comment.

Brad Bellows, 87 Howard Street, spoke about long term site planning. He asked how long it would take to find an alternative location. Any alternative to the current facility should be thought about now. He stated that this process needs to start soon or nothing will happen. In regard to flooding, he asked what would happen at this site in the event of a flood. There is a slight hazard with changing the fuels. It is important to get on with the conversion to LEU and MIT should be a leader in this effort even if other experts keep pushing the date out. We are in total free fall on the conversion. He stated that with the two institutions located in the City there is a threat from terrorist. He spoke about issues with the containment building, mechanical failure and the integrity of the containment, condensation, constant groundwater monitoring. Any risk discussion, whether it is about a structural failure, terrorist threats or transportation risks, must reflect this reactor's unique position given the density of Cambridge, the value of property and the number of people in the immediate vicinity of the reactor.

James Williamson, 1000 Jackson Place, stated that it was ironic that the hearing date was the anniversary of Hiroshima. He also stated that there are things we can learn when looking closer at things. He spoke about how information was misrepresented. There is reason for caution and skepticism with nuclear power as represented by nuclear experts. He has family in Japan. It does not have to be a terrorist attack; it may be an accident. What background check is done with public access? How much of research is classified. He is interested in storage and transportation information. Is storage only every 18 months? He would like to see program moved to Lincoln Labs.

James Herms, MIT alumni, 14 Lawrence Street, stated that one proposal he would like to make to reduce a threat is that there has been a breach of security at the building next door and people simply wandering around the site. He does not know if the CFD has visited the adjacent buildings. MIT does not report bomb threat and bomb scares. He will release all false alarm information which he requested as a Freedom of Information Request. Police logs are public records, but are sensitive. He wrote police logs for MIT in 2006 and 2007 but thought they weren't allowed now because it would be too stressful for the administration. The Tech publishes police log information twice a year. John Hopkins, reporter for The Tech stated that Mr. Herms does not speak on behalf of the newspaper and is mischaracterizing the newspaper whose publishing is not affected by MIT's administration.

Mr. Moncton stated that no classified restriction goes on at the MITR.

Mr. Bellows wanted the 2004 SAR. Location hazards locate where something is and values around the reactor. There is an obsolete use due to the value around the reactor in terms of population density and property investments around MIT, etc. That has changed drastically since reactor was first built and skews the risk assessment towards low risk/high cost. He asked if the cost of a cleanup has been estimated. Cambridge regulates tattoo parlors and restaurants. Cambridge has a regulation for bio recombinant DNA. He feels that there should be an independent regulation for the MITR and an independent peer review of MIT's safety analysis. There should be institutionalized oversight in the City.

Dr. Moncton addressed Mr. Bellows concerns. He is a big supporter of regulation and peer review. This is a mechanism for a later discussion.

Councillor Kelley thanked all those present for their attendance.

Ms. Gallop extended an invitation to Councillors Kelley, Cheung and vanBeuzekom to tour the MITR.

On motion of Councillor Kelley the meeting adjourned at 6:50pm.

For the Committee,
Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair

Committee Report #2
The Public Safety Committee held a public meeting on Tues, July 17, 2012 beginning at 5:30pm in the Sullivan Chamber.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the jurisdiction of non-Cambridge Police Department law enforcement organizations including Harvard, MIT, State and MBTA Police and Health Alliance, special security personnel and out of town officers on construction details.

Present at the meeting were Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair of the Committee; Vice Mayor Denise Simmons; and Councillor Minka vanBeuzekom; Superintendent of Police Steven Williams, Deputy Superintendent of Police Joseph Wilson, and Sergeant James Crowley, Cambridge Police Department (CPD); John DiFava, Chief, MIT Police; and Interim City Clerk Donna P. Lopez.

Also present was Wendy Davis Johnson, Journalist, Harvard University.

Councillor Kelley convened the meeting and explained the purpose.

At 5:33pm Councillor Kelley opened the meeting to public comment. No one appeared and public comment was closed by Councillor Kelley.

Councillor Kelley stated that he has been asked why do institutions and universities have police departments as well as what these officers can enforce. He hopes that the report of this meeting will assist the public in understanding the jurisdiction issues. He also noted that he had seen an officer in Central Square in a car marked "Special Officer" jurisdictional powers were for the special officer.

Vice Mayor Simmons inquired what the jurisdiction of the various law enforcement agencies is. Councillor Kelley commented that the MBTA police can issue tickets for traffic stops, but he does not know what else they can do.

Superintendent Williams stated that Chapter 90 grants the state police full arrest powers for motor vehicle violations. The transit police have the same powers in any area where their jurisdiction touches any service line for a total of roughly 87 communities. Councillor Kelley asked what full arrest powers are. Superintendent Williams responded it covers the power to arrest for a felony, or be stopped for any state law. Councillor Kelley asked if the MBTA police could conduct a stake out. Superintendent Williams stated the MBTA police would have to coordinate with the local police to conduct a stake out.

Chief DiFava stated that the environmental police are the only enforcement authority and expertise in the state for enforcement of Fish and Game laws. Councillor Kelley asked what happens with federal laws regarding trafficking and endangering animals. Superintendent Williams responded that the CPD and state police would not get involved with federal laws. State and local authorities do not enforce federal laws. Chief DiFava commented that it is more complicated. If a felony is in progress an arrest could be made on federal property such as a Post Office or the Volpe Center by local or state police.

Councillor vanBeuzekom asked the meaning of "jurisdiction". Physical location or geography is jurisdiction responded Superintendent Williams. Chief DiFava explained that Fish and Game laws are a subset of state laws and only certain people can enforce these laws.

Councillor Kelley asked what the jurisdiction limitation for Harvard and MIT police are. Chief DiFava stated that university police have full police powers on property owned, operated or rented by a college or university. These powers are granted by the State Police. MIT has jurisdiction over sororities located in Boston. MIT officers do not have chapter 90 powers to conduct traffic stops. The Harvard, MIT and Cambridge Police are all trained at the same academy. MIT could not operate without the resources of the CPD and there is a good relationship with both entities. Superintendent Williams commented that the issue of jurisdiction does not mean that authority stops at certain boundaries. If there is an incident that occurs in the City the CPD will enforce the law. The status of Health Alliance officers was not as clear- it was thought that they were constables with full power of arrest in Cambridge on Alliance property.

Councillor Kelley told of an incident where he was assaulted in the Pit in Harvard Square and a MBTA undercover officer felt he did not have jurisdiction. Superintendent Williams informed Councillor Kelley that the MBTA officer did in fact have the power to arrest for an assault and battery offense. Sergeant Crowley informed the committee that the Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA) personnel have arrest powers granted by the City Manager. Employees are only able to use powers on CHA property.

Councillor vanBeuzekom asked where violators are held. Superintendent Williams responded that all CPD arrests go the CPD; state and Transit police arrests go to a state facility.

Councillor Kelley questioned constable powers. Sergeant Crowley stated that all constables have the power to arrest. Some have the power to serve civil process. CPD personnel would require permission to serve civil process. Superintendent Williams added that you must be a full police officer to issue a citation. Regarding the special police incident stated above, Sergeant Crowley stated that special police decals can be purchased by anyone and that does not give any particular powers. The officer in question was probably a constable.

Councillor vanBeuzekom questioned the state gun law. Superintendent Williams stated that the law requires that a person must be licensed by the state to carry a gun. Chief DiFava added that the state police must license security companies who then must regulate their employees. These employees do not have power of arrest. Vice Mayor Simmons stated that all security firms are not equal. Sergeant Crowley informed the committee that a background check by State Police is done on all constables and security guards. Licenses can be suspended for suspicious behavior. Councillor vanBeuzekom asked if the process is different if one wanted to have a gun for protection. She was informed the process is the same to carry firearms.

Councillor Kelley asked what authority is given to out of city officers. Sergeant Crowley stated that there exists with CPD Memos of Understanding between the City and other communities. Through MOUs, officers from other Cities have the power of arrest and enforcement, though Cambridge-specific ordinances would be tough to enforce because these officers do not have a Cambridge citation book. State and Environmental Police already have jurisdiction. Vice Mayor Simmons asked if these officers are connected to Cambridge's radio system. Sergeant Crowley responded in the affirmative. Councillor Kelley further asked if the CPD radios are in sync with outside officers, Harvard and MIT. Sergeant Crowley responded that all radios are in sync. An explanation was given regarding the radios and the connectivity issue relating to an incident at the motel on Route 2. Emergency Channel 16 had been working, but there was still anxiety about communications at the time.

Vice Mayor questioned the authority of police officers on details. Sergeant Crowley stated that officers on details are on duty to protect the public safety of the citizens but they are hired to perform a specific service for someone and will focus on that, such as securing a construction site. If necessary, they can break away for an emergency, but they are not on-site for general law enforcement. These officers are ambassadors for the City. Vice Mayor Simmons spoke about officers on jobs such as NSTAR. Sergeant Crowley informed the Vice Mayor that before outside officers are brought into the City they are investigated for their conduct. Outside officers supplement CPD and address public safety issues.

Vice Mayor Simmons asked if the outside officers have the authority to issue a motor vehicle violation ticket. Chief DiFava stated that MIT officers cannot issue tickets under chapter 90. Chapter 90 is very complicated. MIT's authority stops at the sidewalk on Memorial Drive. MIT can issue a moving violation on MIT's property; but there are no teeth in the enforcement. If MIT or Harvard police want to issue a chapter 90 violation, they would have to contact CPD. If any out-of-town or university officer wanted to have a local citation, such as for an unleashed dog or a bicyclist riding on the sidewalk, CPD would have to be on-scene because those local violations are only in the Cambridge-specific ticket book, which non-CPD officers do not have.

Councillor vanBeuzekom asked if the state police has jurisdiction on CDR property. Superintendent Williams responded in the affirmative.

Councillor Kelley questioned the Memos of Understanding. Superintendent Williams explained that they are mutual aid agreements outlined in chapter 48. Other agencies have authority to assume full power if mutual aid is needed. Preexisting MOU are for details only. Cambridge has to ask other community to assist and the other community must agree.

Vice Mayor Simmons questioned whether you are a police officer you are a police officer wherever. Chief DiFava explained if an Arlington police officer comes to Cambridge and witnesses an incident and takes action he will be covered. However Sergeant Crowley explained if an Arlington police officer witnessed an assault or running a red light in another community the officer has no authority to take action because not asked to assist by Arlington. However the officer can be used as a witness to the offense. Officers can serve warrants anywhere, though.

Sergeant Crowley stated that CPD primary focus is on public safety rather than enforcing municipal violations. There are 700 outside police officers working in Cambridge and supplying municipal code violation citations is not possible. CPD enforces municipal code violations.

Councillor Kelley asked what outside officers and agencies are working in Cambridge. Arlington, Medford, Somerville, Melrose, Everett, MIT, HU, state police, transit and environmental police responded Sergeant Crowley. Councillor vanBeuzekom asked who and what the environmental police are. They are game wardens responded Superintendent Williams. While there is no MOU for Harvard and MIT police details, those officers do have Deputy Sherriff's powers. Should a car need to be towed, a Cambridge police officer, not an out of town officer, would have to issue the citation.

Chief DiFava stated that MIT officers are given deputy sheriff powers. Traffic enforcement is a separate issue. Bringing in outside officers to help is not new.

Vice Mayor Simmons asked if an incident occurs on the Charles River are the environmental police called. Chief DiFava stated that the state police have jurisdiction of the Charles River. The CPD would assist with a rescue on the Charles stated Deputy Superintendent Wilson. He informed the committee of a recent incident where a wife jumped off the bridge and her husband jumped in to save her. Chief DiFava stated that all agencies work and cooperate with each other. Police can cross jurisdictions in "hot pursuit."

Councillor vanBeuzekom asked how idling is regulated. She was informed that the CPD enforces idling under chapter 90. Councillor Kelley asked where you can get a primer on chapter 90. Sergeant Crowley stated that chapter 90 is very thick and complicated. Councillor Kelley asked if there is a motor vehicle incident chapter 90 covers the violation. Sergeant Crowley explained that if there is a conflict in the law the state laws supersede. Councillor Kelley asked if truck enforcement is covered by chapter 90. Sergeant Crowley responded it is mostly a federal law. Chief DiFava stated that the truck team works under federal law. Most federal laws are included or mirrored in chapter 90. Superintendent Williams added that federal and state laws mirror each other. Councillor vanBeuzekom asked if there is less truck traffic. Superintendent Williams stated that truck laws are still enforced on the restrictive roads but Cambridge has not had a truck team for 3 or 4 years. Most truck incidents occur because of development.

Councillor vanBeuzekom asked who investigates murder incidents. Superintendent Williams responded the District Attorney. The CPD works with the state police on these matters. Chief DiFava stated that the DA has jurisdiction on any crime but does use the local authority to handle the incident except in major crimes like murder. Councillor Kelley commented that when the DA takes over investigation the CPD plays a supportive role.

Councillor Kelley thanked all those present for their attendance.

The meeting adjourned at 6:35 P.M. on motion of Councillor Kelley.

For the Committee,
Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair

Committee Report #3
The Public Safety Committee held a public meeting on Mon, Aug 13, 2012 beginning at 5:30pm in the Sullivan Chamber.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss security cameras.

Present at the meeting were Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair of the Committee; Councillor Timothy J. Toomey, Jr.; Vice Mayor E. Denise Simmons; Councillor Minka vanBeuzekom; Matt Nelson, Chief of Staff for Mayor Henrietta Davis; Councillor Leland Cheung; Deputy City Manager Richard Rossi; and Interim City Clerk Donna P. Lopez.

Also present were Christian Lanphere, Emergency Manager, Cambridge Health Alliance; David DiNapoli, Chief of Security, Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA); Lieutenant Jim Jones, State Police; John DiFava, Chief of Police, MIT; Kade Crockford, ACLU; Alex Jablokov, 16 Kastle Park; James Williamson, 1000 Jackson Place; and Joe Gilson, Councillor vanBeuzekom's father.

Councillor Kelley convened the meeting and explained the purpose. This discussion on security cameras is occurring because the City received money from the Homeland Security and put up cameras that have never been used. Subsequently the City had the opportunity to set up a test of cameras along Rindge Avenue where areas of public safety concern might be covered but there was no clear thought that these cameras would be a good idea. Currently there is no policy on security cameras and whether or not they are linked to each other or to some central data gathering and monitoring system. The City Manager needs guidance from the City Council on security cameras. This may be the first step to formalizing a policy on security cameras.

Vice Mayor Simmons asked about cameras in the public way versus cameras in the private way, like traffic lights etc. This was brought up years ago and she was opposed to using public funds for cameras on the public way. There are people who support security cameras as a means of preventing crime. She is not sure she wants cameras on the public way but is interested in the discussion.

Chief DiFava explained what MIT's cameras are used for. There are 26 exterior cameras that are located on the campus; 10 have the ability to look at a public way as they can tilt, pan zoom, etc. They could have more internal cameras but folks do not like them there either. Cameras can only record video. It is against the law to record audio without two party consent. Cameras are used for security at places like their gas storage area or high vandalism areas like their bus monitor. If not affirmatively protected, data is recorded after 14 days. A bike accident was recorded by an MIT camera near Kresege Center. Building 15, Green Building has a camera. At this location there is expensive weather monitoring equipment. This camera views Memorial Drive. Cameras on Ames Street, Wadsworth Street and Massachusetts Avenue record the public way.

David DiNapoli, Chief of Security, CHA, has cameras at 3 hospital locations and all clinics, some of which catch the public way as they view parking areas, etc. One camera records Line Street. The Windsor Street Clinic also has a camera that records the public way. Data is kept for 30 days. Data is only released for evidentiary evidence. The CHA has signs posted stating that the CHA has cameras, but they are not monitored.

Lieutenant Jones stated that there are cameras on the Boston side of the Charles River but not Cambridge. The state police is interested in having cameras installed on the Cambridge side of the Charles River. Data is kept 30 days and is rerecorded over. Videos are date and time stamped. There are 12 cameras on the Boston side recording the pedestrian bridge. There is a capability to monitor for himself and 3 other people, but monitoring is not done consistently. Access authority is only held by 3 persons. They want to put cameras in crime areas such as along the river.

Vice Mayor Simmons asked if all video cameras are date and time stamped. Lieutenant Jones responded in the affirmative. He stated that if cameras were available in Cambridge the state police would be able to monitor Memorial Drive, the entire parkland of the Charles River Reservation and intersections where serious accidents occur, such as Land Boulevard.

Councillor Kelley asked Mr. Rossi for information on the City security cameras. Mr. Rossi stated that the cameras were installed, but not hooked up and that CPD and CFD would have camera information. Councillor Toomey stated that there are certain properties that are a constant nuisance. These properties deserve extra scrutiny. The properties that require constant police presence should have security cameras.

Councillor vanBeuzekom inquired if the MBTA was invited to this meeting. Councillor Kelley responded in the affirmative. Councillor vanBeuzekom asked if this discussion included red light cameras. Councillor Kelley stated that red light cameras do not run all the time; they only work when a red light is run. Surveillance cameras are on all the time. The DCR, MBTA, CHA and universities all have cameras. Surveillance cameras are for looking at things, but they are not monitored. Chief DiFava stated some MIT cameras are monitored, but these cameras are not on the exterior of buildings.

Kade Crockford, UCLA, asked Lieutenant Jones what computer software was used to log on and can any other agency log on. Lieutenant Jones stated that the system is an internal internet system and no other agency can log on to the system. The Fusion Center and EOPS can log on, but no outside agency can log on. Councillor vanBeuzekom asked what a Fusion Center is. Lieutenant Jones replied that the Fusion Center is an entity at the state police that collects information for homeland security; an intelligent agency collection.

Councillor Kelley asked if the court can force access and discretion. Lieutenant Jones stated that the state has some discretion but everyone is subject to court orders. Councillor vanBeuzekom asked if this is the same for the CHA. Mr. DiNapoli stated that the CHA can be subjected to freedom of information law, but would defer to the lawyers. Chief DiFava stated that if MIT received a court order the records would be released. Councillor Toomey asked how long the records are kept. Lieutenant Jones responded that the records are kept for 30 days unless there is an issue, and then the record is pulled.

Councillor Kelley asked if any cameras use facial recognition. Chief DiFava commented that the camera is the same; it is the software that is different. Councillor Kelley asked if the collected data from cameras and the software have been used after the fact to see a license plate number. Lieutenant Jones stated that police cruisers have cameras that record license plates for stolen cars, outstanding warrants, etc. They can run about 2000 plates an hour. Councillor Kelley commented that the fact that cruisers are recording plates is significant. Lieutenant Jones stated that this data is collected on all vehicles. Ms. Crockford stated that the ACLU has been working on this issue were plates are recorded. The information on every single driver is stored for a long time. This ACLU is concerned about this issue. Some municipalities also have license plate cameras on cruisers. This plan collects the information from other agencies and sends it to the state police. It marks time, date and location. With this information the police will be able to go back and track the whereabouts of a person, or at least a person's car, without a warrant.

Mr. Jablokav stated that he wants decisions to be made openly and the public to be aware of the decisions.

Councillor Toomey stated that he favors placing security cameras on City property that abuts housing. The phone company records where we are and this is never addressed. He is more concerned with a private entity collecting this information. Councillor Kelley stated that the City Council needs to state their opinion on security cameras and this may be uncomfortable for some.

Councillor Cheung stated that he thought this was an issue for the City Council to discuss fact finding on cameras and have a policy discussion on the City Council floor. Councillor Kelley stated that the City Manager was put in an unfair position on security cameras.

Councillor vanBeuzekom asked the agencies to explain if the security cameras have been helpful and to state the breaches. Councillor Kelley asked if the state has a position on cameras or what does law enforcement use the security cameras for. Lieutenant Jones commented that security cameras are used as a deterrent and if a crime is committed as a tool to view the incident. He explained that the data shows that robbers attack their victims away from where the cameras are located so security cameras along State property may push crime to properties without cameras but not actually stop it. Outside his jurisdiction he gets information from cameras to be on the lookout for perpetrators and this provides information for follow-up investigations. Similarly, State Police cameras provide pictorial information to local jurisdictions who often recognize people.

Mr. Lanphere spoke about the recent incident in California where a child was being kidnapped from a hospital. The hospital followed policy and the security personnel started looking at the film and the perpetrator was caught at the door. This is a huge benefit for hospitals.

Chief DiFava stated that cameras have saved money from vandalism, skate boarding, etc. Cameras were used to reconstruct accidents. Lieutenant Jones added that since the cameras were installed on the Boston side of the Esplanade, sexual assaults have been reduced. Sexual predators are identified on film. Mr. Rossi stated that in general there are a lot of cameras around that the general public is not aware of. The City is limited to see what is on the public way and accessing information from privately mounted cameras. Public property has tight restrictions. What is the criterion to use security cameras and for what crimes. The Council could set policy on that. We are interested in the safety of the public. Lieutenant Jones added that all in this room is capable of recording anything with the use of their cell phone. The public posts all sorts of crime in process videos. Joe Gilson asked if Boston has criteria for their cameras. Councillor vanBeuzekom stated that phones are private entities but the issue of cameras as a deterrent is different as robbers know where the cameras are. Chief DiFava stated that cameras are not everywhere but are one tool in multiple layers of crime prevention. Mr. Rossi said that the Police and Fire Departments would like security cameras installed.

Councillor Kelley asked what are the down side and the concerns for using public property for public cameras. Lieutenant Jones listed property damage; cameras and where they are located can be damaged. Ms. Crockford spoke about her concerns around privacy and surveillance and transparency. Homeland security has given money to cities for surveillance and this has occurred without transparency and public dialogue. There is a balance. Cameras push crime away sometimes - do we want cameras everywhere to deter crime. Who has access, how long is information retained, is information shared with the Boston Regional Intelligent Center, and is there accountability and transparency around use built in, what kind of physical capabilities such as zooming and color and panning do cameras have and what about integration of new technologies. She stated that integrated technology and face recognition technology is dangerous. If there is face recognition technology built in the City needs to establish strict guidelines and ensure that it is not used improperly. Perhaps warrants to guard against personal use or abuse.

Councillor Kelley added that how to use this information is why guidelines are necessary.

James Williamson, 1000 Jackson Place, spoke of an incident where there was a murder in Cambridge. The family has expressed concern about the unwillingness of police to provide information from the surveillance cameras that are in place. Family members of victims would like access to this information. He asked about the DCR cameras installed at the McCrehan pool and if the state police have access to these cameras. Lieutenant Jones informed the committee that this is a separate system. The state police would have to get access from the DCR.

Councillor Kelley commented on the problematic issue of camera access and when is it appropriate to use the cameras.

Councillor vanBeuzekom asked Mr. Rossi if the City would be required to share information, if recorded, with the Urban Area Collaborative. Mr. Rossi stated that Chief Reardon would be the best person to answer this question. The fear was that cameras on City property would record information that the City was not sure about. There are 6 cameras on light polls. Mr. DiNapoli stated these are mechanical devises and they do fail from time to time even with maintenance. Ms. Crockford also spoke about advanced computer hackers in Cambridge.

Councillor vanBeuzekom stated that three different security cameras were discussed. Red light cameras - this was taken off the table. Councillor Kelley commented that there have been meetings held on red light cameras; however a follow-up meeting could be held. Councillor vanBeuzekom stated that perhaps there could be security cameras at hot spots to deter crime - access and share issues are different than homeland security cameras where pointed to a road for emergency situation. The privacy issues for the cameras are different. These cameras may not have the capability to capture license plate numbers depending on resolution and placement. She would like 3 different types of discussions on the different use of cameras.

James Williamson suggested that it would be useful to get hackers from MIT to participate in the discussions. He noted that a person walking around with a camera on his head freaked people out. He stated his concern about people who experienced crime and if there were surveillance cameras if the information could be shared. CHA has tons of cameras. People do not commit crime in Jefferson Park because of the cameras - they go across the street. However, people who are surrounded by surveillance cameras feel they have no privacy. He spoke about cameras recording people stealing from coin machines in a court house. The ACLU asked good questions. The scope of criminal behavior is big. He worried about a loss of focus, about personal interactions about cameras.

Ms. Crockford spoke about the different types of cameras - license plate (optical recognition camera) cameras take pictures and are different from CCTV cameras which are powerful, can zoom a long distance and see clearly. She suggested looking into what kind of cameras they are. Homeland Security cameras are very powerful.

Councillor Kelley stated there will be additional meetings. Cambridge needs to figure out what tools we either want or do not want regarding security cameras. He is having difficulty telling people that cameras cannot record a hot spot. The next meeting will be on the legality issue.

Councillor Kelley thanked all those present for their attendance.

The meeting adjourned at 6:56pm.

For the Committee,
Councillor Craig Kelley, Chair

AWAITING REPORT LIST
12-02. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the repair of all street lights that are not working in Cambridge.
Vice Mayor Simmons and Full Membership 01/23/12 (O-1)

12-08. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on instituting a ban on plastic bags.
Councillor Decker, Councillor vanBeuzekom and Full Membership 01/23/12 (O-10)

12-20. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on what steps the City will take to help the general public keep track of awaiting maintenance issues on things like park equipment, graffiti, sidewalks, etc.
Councillor Kelley, Councillor Decker, Councillor Cheung, Mayor Davis, Councillor Maher, Vice Mayor Simmons & Councillor Toomey 02/13/12 (O-4)

12-29. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the no left turn on the Cambridge Common and to remove the bicycle prohibition on certain streets, such as Whittemore Avenue. Referred back for additional information on 3/5/2012.
Councillor Kelley 02/13/12 (O-17)

12-40. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on improper leases and rental of owned affordable housing units. Reconsideration filed by Councillor Toomey on 6/11/2012. Report referred back to City Manager for more information on motion of Councillor Toomey on 6/18/12.
Councillor Reeves, Councillor Cheung, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Kelley, Councillor Maher, Vice Mayor Simmons & Councillor vanBeuzekom 03/19/12 (O-3)

12-51. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the feasibility of finding additional office space for the City Council.
Vice Mayor Simmons, Councillor Cheung, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Reeves & Councillor vanBeuzekom 04/23/12 (O-5)

12-54. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on how to establish an Community Choice Aggregation Network which will engage in electricity procurement for the entire City of Cambridge.
Councillor vanBeuzekom and Full Membership 04/23/12 (O-9)

12-64. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on current status of the Inlet Bridge and what steps the City can take to ensure that agreements with the Commonwealth are upheld.
Councillor Toomey and Full Membership 05/21/12 (O-1)

12-65. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on an explanation as the when the main library will be open on Sundays.
Councillor vanBeuzekom, Councillor Cheung, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Maher, Councillor Reeves, Vice Mayor Simmons & Councillor Toomey 05/21/12 (O-2)

12-67. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on implementing a ban on trucks transporting hazardous materials through the City.
Councillor Cheung 05/21/12 (O-5)

12-70. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on accepting payment at parking meters via credit card.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 06/04/12 (O-9)

12-71. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the possibility of converting the vacant lots at the corner of Watson and Brookline Streets and at 35 Cherry Street to community gardens or open space.
Councillor Cheung, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Kelley, Councillor Maher, Councillor Reeves, Vice Mayor Simmons, Councillor Toomey & Councillor vanBeuzekom 06/04/12 (O-10)

12-72. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on how increases in student loans might impact Cambridge students.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 06/04/12 (O-11)

12-74. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the feasibility of expanding the barbeque pilot program in parks throughout Cambridge.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 06/04/12 (O-13)

12-75. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the feasibility of providing a map of long term parking spots for rent on the city website.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 06/04/12 (O-16)

12-78. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on expanding the number of Cambridge parks/playing fields with public toilets. Referred back to the City Manager on 6/18/12 on motion of Councillor Kelley.
Councillor vanBeuzekom and Full Membership 06/11/12 (O-5)

12-81. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on meeting with No. Mass Avenue neighbors, businesses and neighborhood groups about whether additional alterations to the median strip would be appropriate.
Councillor Kelley and Full Membership 06/11/12 (O-9)

12-82. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the feasibility of implementing an initiative similar to the Boston Meter Program.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 06/11/12 (O-11)

12-85. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on installing security cameras in the Donnelly Field area.
Councillor Toomey and Full Membership 06/11/12 (O-14)

12-87. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the potential uses of the Foundry Building.
Councillor Toomey 06/04/12 (O-19)

12-88. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on how the City plans to maintain grade separated bikeways and keep them free from sand, branches and other debris.
Councillor Kelley and Full Membership 06/11/12 (O-7)

12-89. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the feasibility of implementing speed-control measures at the corner of Tremont Street and Gardner Road.
Vice Mayor Simmons, Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 07/30/12 (O-2)

12-90. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on Executive Session to discuss lawsuits.
Councillor Reeves and Full Membership 07/30/12 (O-5)

12-91. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the installation of lower and decorative lighting along Cardinal Medeiros Avenue.
Councillor Toomey and Full Membership 07/30/12 (O-6)

12-95. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on creating a Pavement to Parklet program.
Councillor vanBeuzekom, Councillor Cheung, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Kelley, Councillor Maher, Councillor Reeves & Councillor Toomey 07/30/12 (O-10)

12-97. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the incident at the Cambridge Gateway Inn on July 5, 2012.
Councillor vanBeuzekom, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Kelley, Councillor Maher, Councillor Reeves & Councillor Toomey 07/30/12 (O-12)

12-99. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on statistical information regarding enforcement citations for loud motorcycle mufflers, car radios and the City's plan to address these issues.
Councillor Kelley and Full Membership 07/30/12 (O-16)

12-102. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on how sequestration would effect municipal finances and the finances of human services organizations that partner with the City.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 07/30/12 (O-30)

12-103. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report with a short summary on how CDBG grants have been used over the past few years in the City, with a list of completed projects, jobs created and the overall impact on the community.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 07/30/12 (O-31)

12-104. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on data requested on the Andrews Petition during an Ordinance Committee hearing last term that has not yet been received.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 07/30/12 (O-34)

12-105. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on answering questions regarding the Foundry Building in order to move the community process forward.
Councillor Cheung & Councillor Toomey 07/30/12 (O-35)

12-106. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on facilitating affordable housing opportunities for middle class families.
Councillor Toomey and Full Membership 09/10/12 (O-13)

12-107. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the number of Cambridge residents that are working as part of organized labor on development projects along with the percentage of minority and women members and what sort of communication takes place with the Rindge School of Technical Arts and local Unions.
Councillor Toomey and Full Membership 09/10/12 (O-14)

12-108. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on applying and participating in the Cities of Services program.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 09/10/12 (O-19)

12-109. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on what strategies other cities have used to dissuade land-banking.
Councillor Cheung and Full Membership 09/10/12 (O-21)

12-110. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the status of 2 Mt. Auburn Street.
Vice Mayor Simmons and Full Membership 09/10/12 (O-23)

12-111. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on improving pedestrian safety on Western Avenue at Kinnaird and Pleasant Streets.
Councillor vanBeuzekom and Full Membership 09/10/12 (O-24)

12-112. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on specific data that compares the actual energy efficiency for the City Hall Annex.
Councillor vanBeuzekom and Full Membership 09/10/12 (O-25)

12-114. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on home foreclosure sales via auction be required to show ownership by the lender or agent of said property before an auction can occur.
Councillor vanBeuzekom, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Maher, Councillor Reeves, Vice Mayor Simmons & Councillor Toomey 09/24/12 (O-3)

12-115. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on making accommodations for voters when elevators are not working or there are other barriers at polling locations on election days.
Councillor Decker, Mayor Davis, Councillor Maher, Councillor Reeves, Vice Mayor Simmons, Councillor Toomey & Councillor vanBeuzekom 09/24/12 (O-6)

12-116. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on maintaining the present Central Square Farmer's Market permit rate despite an increase in the vehicle parking rates.
Councillor vanBeuzekom, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Maher, Councillor Reeves, Vice Mayor Simmons & Councillor Toomey 09/24/12 (O-8)

12-117. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the possibility of expanding the number of residential and meter spaces at the North Point Park.
Councillor Maher, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Reeves, Vice Mayor Simmons, Councillor Toomey & Councillor vanBeuzekom 09/24/12 (O-9)

12-118. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the possibility of installing "Pay by Phone" enabled meters.
Councillor vanBeuzekom, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Maher, Councillor Reeves, Vice Mayor Simmons & Councillor Toomey 09/24/12 (O-10)

12-119. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on banning DeFelice Corp. as a contractor on further work with the City and on the damaged gas pipe and safety measures that took place following the incident at Spring and Fulkerson Street caused by DeFelice Corp.
Councillor Toomey 09/24/12 (O-15)

12-120. Report from the City Manager:
RE: report on the possibility of creating a municipal exterminator and/or contracting exterminators to help eradicate rodent problems in the City.
Councillor Toomey, Mayor Davis, Councillor Decker, Councillor Kelley, Councillor Maher, Councillor Reeves, Vice Mayor Simmons & Councillor vanBeuzekom 10/01/12 (O-3)