CHARTER RIGHT
1. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the City Solicitor and other relevant City departments to consider the pending State legislation and pending legislation in the City of Boston and any other actions that would allow Cambridge to institute municipal lobbying regulations. [Charter Right exercised by Councillor Kelley on Mar 21, 2016.]
Mazen amendment to send to both Gov't. Ops. and City Manager FAILED 3-5-1 (Carlone, Devereux, Mazen YES; Kelley, Maher, McGovern, Toomey, Simmons NO; Cheung ABSENT)
Kelley amendment to send to Gov't Ops. PASSED 6-2-1 (Carlone, Mazen NO; Cheung ABSENT)
Order Adopted as Amended 8-0-1 [Cheung ABSENT]

O-3     Mar 21, 2016  Referred to Gov't Operations, Rules, & Claims Committee
COUNCILLOR DEVEREUX
COUNCILLOR CARLONE
COUNCILLOR MAZEN
WHEREAS: The City of Cambridge continually strives to be open, transparent and accountable to the public it serves; and
WHEREAS: Disclosing municipal lobbying efforts is an emerging best practice for municipalities nationwide, as it promotes government transparency, and enhances the public’s trust in their local government; and
WHEREAS: Numerous cities around the country, including Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia, Phoenix, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, San Jose, Austin, Jacksonville, and San Francisco have implemented disclosure regulations for municipal lobbying to achieve a more transparent government; and
WHEREAS: There are currently two proposals, one in the City of Boston and one in the State Legislature, regarding disclosure requirements; and
WHEREAS: The City of Boston is considering municipal lobbying regulations that would require lobbyists in the City of Boston to file twice-yearly reports declaring campaign contributions, the names of their clients, policies that they tried to influence or that they advocated on behalf of, compensation received from clients, and dates of lobbying communications; and
WHEREAS: Mayor Walsh recently filed this legislation with the Boston City Council as a Home Rule petition, and it is currently before the Boston City Council’s Government Operations Committee; and
WHEREAS: The State Senate is also considering Senate Bill 2451, An Act relative to the establishment of a Massachusetts municipal lobbying policy, a local option proposal that would allow municipalities to accept disclosure requirements for municipal lobbyists through the City Clerk’s office; and
WHEREAS: Senate Bill 2451 would require lobbyists receiving more than $2,500 per year to disclose on what issues they are lobbying, who they are lobbying, and would require lobbyists to register annually with the City Clerk’s office; and
WHEREAS: The City of Cambridge is known and respected as a national leader in many areas of open government, including its Open Data Initiative, and continually strives to inform and empower the public to engage in civic issues; and
WHEREAS: It would benefit the public to require lobbyists to register and publicly report their work in the City of Cambridge; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the City Solicitor and other relevant City departments to consider the pending State legislation and pending legislation in the City of Boston and any other actions that would allow Cambridge to institute municipal lobbying regulations, and to report back to the Council in a timely manner.

2. City Council opposition to raising the cap on charter schools, supporting the improvement of district public schools and the equitable division of educational resources. [Charter Right exercised by Councillor Toomey on Mar 21, 2016.]
Adopted 5-3-1 [Kelley, Maher, Mazen, McGovern, Simmons YES; Carlone, Devereux, Toomey NO; Cheung ABSENT]

O-8     Mar 21, 2016
VICE MAYOR MCGOVERN
COUNCILLOR KELLEY
WHEREAS: The creation of charter schools has created a two-tiered educational system that draws resources away from the broad group of public school students to serve a narrow select few; and
WHEREAS: A recent initiative is seeking to expand charter schools in the state by allowing the authorization of up to twelve new charters in a year; and
WHEREAS: Lifting the cap on charter schools would divert even more resources from the traditional public school system – resources such as qualified teachers and money that would improve district schools; and
WHEREAS: Many educational organizations, including teachers’ unions vocally oppose charter expansion; now therefore be it
RESOLVED: That the City Council go on record in opposition to raising the cap on charter schools, supporting the improvement of district public schools and the equitable division of educational resources; and be it further
RESOLVED: That the City Clerk be and hereby is requested to forward a suitably engrossed copy of this resolution to the elected Cambridge delegation in the House and Senate, and to Governor Baker on behalf of the entire City Council.

3. That the City Manager is requested to update the City Council on the effects of the removal of sidewalk vaults in Central Square. [Charter Right exercised by Councillor Kelley on Mar 21, 2016.]
No Action Taken - Placed on File under Rule 20

O-10     Mar 21, 2016
COUNCILLOR CHEUNG
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to update the City Council on the effects of the removal of sidewalk vaults in Central Square.

7. Resolution on the death of Peter Sheinfeld.   Councillor Toomey, Councillor Maher, Mayor Simmons

R-7
Apr 4, 2016
COUNCILLOR TOOMEY
COUNCILLOR MAHER
MAYOR SIMMONS
WHEREAS: This City Council was deeply saddened to learn of the recent passing of Peter Sheinfeld; and
WHEREAS: Peter was a longtime member of the Cambridge Election Commission and was widely known and respected throughout the community, and he shall be greatly missed by so many; now therefore be it
RESOLVED: That this City Council go on record extending its deepest sympathy to the family and many friends of Peter Sheinfeld; and be it further
RESOLVED: That the City Clerk be and hereby is requested to forward a suitably engrossed copy of this resolution to the family of Peter Sheinfeld family on behalf of the entire City Council.

TEXT OF ORDERS
O-1     Apr 4, 2016
MAYOR SIMMONS
WHEREAS: In recent years, there has been a growing national discussion around the symbolism behind many statues, flags, and official seals focusing on whether these cultural touchstones, many of which are hundreds of years old, may contain elements that could be construed as hurtful and divisive in modern society; and
WHEREAS: This national conversation has touched upon everything from the flag of the Confederacy, to the seal of Harvard Law School, to the names of professional sports teams, with the recognition that what was socially acceptable symbolism 300 years ago may now be in conflict with our modern values and perceptions; and
WHEREAS: In light of the larger national discussion, some voices in the community have been urging that the Official Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts be given closer scrutiny, with the argument being made that the seal may contain symbols that degrade specific segments of our society, or that may celebrate events that we may not wish to glorify; now therefore be it
RESOLVED: That the City Council go on record asking the Massachusetts State Legislature to review the symbolism of the Official Seal of Massachusetts to determine whether it may be perpetuating or promoting hurtful symbolism; and be it further
RESOLVED: That the City Clerk be and hereby is requested to forward a suitably engrossed copy of this resolution to the Cambridge Legislative Delegation to the State House and to Governor Baker on behalf of the entire City Council.

From Wikipedia:
The seal was adopted by the Provincial Congress on December 13, 1780. The shield depicts an Algonquian Native American with bow and arrow; the arrow is pointed downward, signifying peace. A white star with five points appears next to the figure's head. A blue ribbon (blue, signifying the Blue Hills of Quincy, Canton and Milton) surrounds the shield, bearing the state motto "Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" This comes from the Book of Mottoes in the Royal Danish Library in Copenhagen, Denmark; written about 1659 by Algernon Sydney, English soldier and politician. It was adopted in 1775 by the Provincial Congress and the literal translation is, "With a sword, she seeks quiet peace under liberty." Although the looser English translation more commonly used is, "By the sword we seek peace, but peace only under liberty." Above the shield is the state military crest: a bent arm holding a broadsword aloft. The sword has its blade up, to remind that it was through the American Revolution that independence was won.

O-3     Apr 4, 2016
COUNCILLOR KELLEY
VICE MAYOR MCGOVERN
WHEREAS: Flat roofs and associated central drains on residential three story homes can lead to more storm water entering Cambridge’s sanitary sewer; and
WHEREAS: These flat roofs may be on homes that have been insulated or otherwise improved for energy efficiency with the result that snow and/or ice during the winter may build up amounts unanticipated by the original building designers; and
WHEREAS: Climate change appears to be bringing more episodes of heavy snow and rainfall during winter months, as experienced during the winter of 2014-2015, and with clogged drains this results in more buildup of snow, ice, and water on flat roofs than may be safe, especially with an energy-efficient building; and
WHEREAS: Retrofitting flat roofs on residential three story houses would alleviate snow, ice, and water buildup safety concerns and would decrease the amount of storm water going into Cambridge’s sanitary sewer system; and
WHEREAS: The expensive alteration of putting a pitched roof on a flat roof could be offset by the added value of increasing interior space in the existing home and possible improving other options for room use; and
WHEREAS: The extra height and living space created as a result of installing a pitched roof may negatively impact neighbors; and
WHEREAS: The Special Permit process used for other challenging zoning situations may be appropriate in this case; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Council refer to the Ordinance Committee and the Planning Board, for hearing and report, the following changes to the Cambridge Zoning Ordinance 5.23 height exceptions:

Section 5.55: Special Provisions for Rainwater Separation in Residential Buildings

In an effort to further the City’s storm-water management, modifications to the applicable dimensional requirements of this Article 5.000, in particular regarding FAR and height limitations, may be authorized by Special Permit from the Board of Zoning Appeal for eliminating rain-water from sewer lines

• On residential buildings with a flat (concave) roof, on which a drain pipe collects water from the roof and combines it with household waste-water, discharging into a single outflow pipe to the municipal sewer line

• Provided that the resulting construction authorized by the Special Permit entirely eliminate rain water entry from the concerned roof into said sewer line

• And that said rain water is either recycled or led down to the ground to follow its natural path

A Special Permit may allow the construction of a partial additional level within the following limitations

• Additional height not to exceed 10ft. above the existing roof line of the building

• Footprint to be no closer than 3ft. from either long edge or rear side of the building, and no less than 6 feet from front/street-side of building

• Side walls shall be mostly translucent above 4 feet from existing roof

• Additional FAR not to exceed 20% of the existing FAR of the building

• This addition may not become an independent or separate dwelling from the floor below the roof

Furthermore, in enhancing sustainable development and alternative energy sources (Article 22), additional positive consideration will be given to “sensibly green” projects that improve the (a) use of passive solar heating, convective cooling, seasonal shading with natural plants, (b) harvesting and/or using rainwater at the roof level or floors below, (c) planting flowering bushes and vegetation attractive to pollinating insects at the roof level, (d) maximizing the use of natural light, and (e) harmonization of the new roof profile with surrounding buildings.

O-5     Apr 4, 2016
COUNCILLOR KELLEY
COUNCILLOR DEVEREUX
COUNCILLOR CARLONE
WHEREAS: The growing popularity of wood-fired foods in the urban culinary scene suggests that Cambridge may experience future conflicts between restaurants and neighbors where neighbors are exposed to problematic levels of smoke exhaust; and
WHEREAS: Experiencing its own renaissance in wood-fired foods, New York City updated its Air Pollution Control Code on May 6, 2015, to prohibit the use of any new “cook stove…without the use of an emissions control device for odors, smoke and particulate matter;” now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to take steps necessary to impose a moratorium, to include the possibility of the City Council implementing a zoning change, on the permitting of all new restaurants where a wood-fired oven is used as a significant method of food preparation, until such time as appropriate regulatory standards might be ordained; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to report back to the City Council on this issue.

O-6     Apr 4, 2016
COUNCILLOR MAZEN
WHEREAS: The City of Cambridge is home to a number of high-density hubs of commercial activity, representing destinations of thousands of daily trips; and
WHEREAS: Cambridge businesses benefit from additional customers, reduced automobile congestion, and reduced levels of air, water, and noise pollution; and
WHEREAS: Motor scooters and motorcycles represent a more efficient method of transportation that allow for greater numbers of people to access local businesses with a per-capita reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, heavy metal water pollutants, noise, and other pollutants; and
WHEREAS: Cambridge’s on-street parking is dedicated almost exclusively to standard-size automobiles, thus disincentivizing resident and visitor use of more efficient motor scooters and motorcycles for local trips; and
WHEREAS: Dedicated motor scooter and motorcycle parking occupies less street area than automobile parking, allowing for more customers for local businesses to access destinations via a relatively fixed streetscape; and
WHEREAS: The current practice of parking motor scooters on sidewalks endangers pedestrians, inhibits handicapped accessibility, and occupies valuable sidewalk space; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to initiate a process to add high capacity dedicated motor scooter and motorcycle on-street parking within dense commercial areas, taking care to coordinate with local residents, businesses, and business associations.

O-8     Apr 4, 2016
COUNCILLOR DEVEREUX
COUNCILLOR CARLONE
WHEREAS: The City of Cambridge has about 19,000 trees in the tree inventory, including over 13,000 street trees and is continually endeavoring to add to the street tree inventory, but newly planted street trees face many challenges to survive in a dense urban environment; and
WHEREAS: The Health & Environment Committee held a public meeting on Sept 16, 2015, to discuss issues pertaining to the health of street trees throughout the city; and
WHEREAS: Several ideas arose to equip residents to assist the City in caring for trees; and
WHEREAS: The Department of Public Works installs Gator Bags on newly planted trees to provide a steady water source to the tree’s roots to help establish its roots to improve the tree’s chances for survival; and
WHEREAS: The Department of Public Works asks residents to refill Gator Bags on trees near their property one or two times per week to help supply water to the tree; and
WHEREAS: It has come to the attention of the City Council that many residents do not understand that they are encouraged to water street trees and refill Gator Bags or how to properly do so, and that more readily available education from the City about how to best care for street trees would enlist more residents in helping care for street trees; and
WHEREAS: Information about how to water street trees, refill Gator Bags, and other tips to best care for street trees could be distributed to all property owners through tax bills and other means; and
WHEREAS: Some cities formalize this resident commitment to care for street trees near their property by implementing an “Adopt-a-Tree” program in which residents assist in the care of a tree including watering; and
WHEREAS: There are many residents throughout the City who possess a great passion for the care of the City’s street trees and would gladly assist the City in helping street trees survive; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to consult with the Department of Public Works, the City Arborist and any other relevant City departments to discuss the feasibility of an education campaign that would be available to all property owners through tax bills and other sources to educate residents about watering street trees near their property, refilling Gator Bags, and other tips for caring for street trees and report back to the City Council in a timely manner; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to consult with the Department of Public Works, the City Arborist and any other relevant city departments to discuss whether implementing a formal “Adopt-a-Tree” program would bolster efforts to enlist residents in tree stewardship and report back to the City Council in a timely manner.

O-9     Apr 4, 2016
COUNCILLOR CHEUNG
WHEREAS: The Cambridge “Bring Your Own Bag” Ordinance is in effect as of Mar 31, 2016, and charges a fee of ten cents per non-reusable bag at retail establishments across the City; and
WHEREAS: The purpose of the ordinance is to reduce the use of disposable checkout bags by retail establishments in order to better protect the marine environment, reduce Cambridge’s accumulation of solid waste, and contribute to a greener Cambridge; and
WHEREAS: Because the fee is merely an inducement used to encourage more environmentally friendly behaviors, its collection would ideally contribute towards other environmental causes; and
WHEREAS: A number of locally based non-profits, like the Ocean River Institute, are actively working towards the goals promoted by the “Bring Your Own Bag” Ordinance and are always in need of more funding to continue their missions; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to investigate the possibility of allowing local businesses to voluntarily donate collected bag fees to non-profit organizations, the newly designed Community Benefits Fund, or the Cambridge Non-Profit Coalition; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to report back to the City Council on this matter.

O-12     Apr 4, 2016  Amended
COUNCILLOR CHEUNG
WHEREAS: The City of Cambridge provides detailed parking requirements for the various land uses in the City in addition to engaging in detailed parking analysis for certain projects; and
WHEREAS: The City of Cambridge has tracked both the number of parking spaces in the City and number of cars registered in the City; and
WHEREAS: Understanding both the number of cars in the City and the number of parking spaces in the City would provide residents and the Council with a better picture of trends in modes of transportation for the City of Cambridge; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to report back to the City Council with the number of parking spaces in the City of Cambridge as well as the number of cars registered in the city.
ORDERED: That this be referred to the Transportation and Public Utilities Committee.

O-16     Apr 4, 2016
VICE MAYOR MCGOVERN
MAYOR SIMMONS
WHEREAS: Central Square is considered the “downtown” of Cambridge; and
WHEREAS: The City Council has had many conversations regarding ways to beautify and maintain Central Square; and
WHEREAS: The City spent significant time and resources to develop the C2 plan; and
WHEREAS: The City Council, during the 2014-2015 term, passed a policy order asking for the City to move forward with the non-zoning recommendation in the C2 plan; and
WHEREAS: Those recommendations have not been implemented; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the appropriate City departments to develop a timeline for when these non-zoning recommendations will be implemented and report back to the City Council regarding this plan.

O-18     Apr 4, 2016
COUNCILLOR TOOMEY
WHEREAS: North Carolina has recently passed discriminatory legislation against the LGBTQ community and which also limits a municipality’s ability to ensure equal rights to all their citizens; and
WHEREAS: The legislation is against the values of the City of Cambridge and our residents; now therefore be it
RESOLVED: That the City Council go on record in opposition to the North Carolina legislation; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to ban all taxpayer-funded travel to North Carolina.

O-20     Apr 4, 2016  Amended
COUNCILLOR MAZEN
VICE MAYOR MCGOVERN
MAYOR SIMMONS
WHEREAS: Senate Bill 1022, which is presently waiting to be heard by the Massachusetts Senate, would allow municipalities in Massachusetts to set their own minimum wage without contest; and
WHEREAS: The current statewide minimum wage of $10.00 per hour is only two-thirds of the current Cambridge Living Wage standard of $15.04 per hour; and
WHEREAS: The Cambridge City Council has expressed its concern about low wages in Cambridge and their detrimental impact on the city’s residents; and
WHEREAS: State Senate Bill S. 1022 would give the City of Cambridge the ability to address the issue of low wages in Cambridge by raising the current minimum wage in Cambridge, under direction of the Council; now therefore be it
RESOLVED: That the City Council go on record in support of State Senate Bill S. 1022; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Clerk be and hereby is requested to forward a suitably engrossed copy of this resolution to the Cambridge Legislative Delegation and Senate President Stanley Rosenberg on behalf of the entire City Council.

TEXT OF COMMITTEE REPORTS
Committee Report #1
The Government Operations, Rules and Claims Committee held a public hearing on Fri, Mar 11, 2016 beginning at 11:04am in the Sullivan Chamber.

The purpose of the hearing was to discuss the continued employment of City Manager Richard Rossi beyond June 30, 2106 and to initiate negotiations for a successor employment contract and any other related business put forth.

Present at the hearing were Councillor Maher, Chair of the Committee; Vice Mayor McGovern; Councillor Toomey; as well as Councillor Cheung and Councillor Mazen, Members of the Committee who participated remotely; Councillor Carlone; Councillor Devereux; Councillor Kelley; Mayor Simmons; Richard Rossi, City Manager; Lisa Peterson, Deputy City Manager; Louis DePasquale, Assistant City Manager for Fiscal Affairs; Ellen Semonoff, Assistant City Manager for Human Services; Iram Farooq, Assistant City Manager for Community Development; Maryellen Carvello, Administrative Assistant, Executive Department; Taha Jennings, Assistant to the City Manager; Lee Gianetti, Director of Communications and Community Relations; Ini Tomeu, Public Information Officers; Joe Wilson, Superintendent of Police; Paul Sheehan, Assistant Fire Chief; Nancy Glowa, City Solicitor; Arthur Goldberg, Deputy City Solicitor; Owen O'Riordan, Commissioner of Public Works; Kathy Watkins, Assistant Public Works Commissioner; John Nardone, Assistant Commissioner of Operations, Public Works Department; Sheila Keady-Rawson, Personnel Director; Duane Brown, Affirmative Action Officer; Michelle Kincaid, Director, Financial System and Operations, Finance Department; Jeana Franconi, Budget Director; Sam Corda, Managing Director, Water Department; Ranjit Singanayagam, Inspectional Services Commissioner; Martha Flynn, Deputy Inspectional Services Commissioner; Mary Hart, Chief Information Officer; Steve Lenkauskas, City Electrician; Amy Witts, Purchasing Agent; Brian Corr, Executive Director, Cambridge Peace Commission; Nancy Schlacter, Executive Director, Human Rights Commission; Claude-Alix Jacob, Chief Public Health Officer, Cambridge Public Health Alliance; Sandra Albano, Executive Assistant to the City Council; Paula Crane, Deputy City Clerk; Donna P. Lopez, City Clerk; and Jane Rossi.

Also present were John Hawkinson, 2 Clinton Street; Carol O'Hare, 172 Magazine Street; James Williamson, 1000 Jackson Place; Robert Winters, 366 Broadway; Nancy Ryan, 4 Ashburton Place; Hasson Rashid, 820 Mass. Ave.; Ilan Levy, 148 Spring Street; Michael Brandon, 27 Seven Pines Avenue; Lee Farris 269 Norfolk Street; and Susan Fleischman, CCTV.

Councillor Maher convened the hearing and explained the purpose. He stated that the hearing was being privately recorded. Two members of the City Council are out of town and will participate remotely. He proceeded to the process for remote participation.

REMOTE PARTICIPATION
Councillor Maher announced that the City Manager has authorized the use of remote participation at meetings of the City’s public bodies and transmitted to the City Council on May 13, 2012 the Open Meeting Law Regulations issued by the Attorney General on Nov 11, 2011, 940 CMR 29.10, to be used as guidelines for the City’s use of remote participation.

Councillor Maher, Chair of the Government Operations, Rules and Claims Committee, stated that there is a quorum of the committee, including the chair of the committee, present in the Sullivan Chamber and there is compliance with the Open Meeting Law.

Councillor Maher announced that Councillor Mazen and Councillor Cheung have prior to the hearing notified the Mayor of their desire to participate remotely in the hearing and identified the reason for and the facts support their request; that being geographic distance.

The Chair has determined that because the absent City Councilors’ physical attendance at the hearing is unreasonably difficult due to geographic distance Councillor Mazen and Councillor Cheung will remotely participate in the hearing and is in attendance at the hearing via teleconferencing.

Councillor Maher announced that this information must be recorded in the hearing minutes.

Remote access must be clearly audible to all people present at the hearing and to each other. Councillor Mazen and Councillor Cheung announced that they can hear the proceedings clearly.

Councillor Maher announced that Councillor Mazen and Councillor Cheung are clearly audible to both the City Council and the public.

Councillor Maher announced that all votes taken must be roll call vote.

Councillor Maher thanked all present. He stated that the City Manager will like to make a statement.

STATEMENT OF CITY MANAGER RICHARD C. ROSSI
City Manager Rossi thanked the City Council for this hearing to extend his contract.

Mar 11, 2016
To the Honorable, the City Council:

After lengthy discussions with my family, I have decided not to seek an extension of my contract as Cambridge City Manager.

This has been a very difficult decision for me. I want to thank the City Council for the opportunity to lead this incredible City, about which I care very deeply. Your faith in me and your support over the last three years have been greatly appreciated and it has been a true honor and privilege for me to serve as City Manager.

For the past 45 years, I have worked to improve our community and I have enjoyed every minute of it. As someone who grew up and went to public school in Cambridge, I am so proud that I have been able to play a role in helping my city – our city -- become the great City that it is today. Of course it has been challenging at times, but the work of the last three years has been rewarding, and I believe that we have made positive steps towards shaping the future for both residents and businesses.

As I begin preparing to leave, I want you to know that I am extremely proud of our employees, in particular, the strong leadership of our Department Heads and their teams. Since my appointment as City Manager, one of my priorities was to ensure that when I retired, each department would have a strong leadership team that was well prepared to be an asset to my replacement. Our next City Manager will inherit a workforce that is highly professional and committed to working hard to achieve the City’s goals.

Although my contract calls for my departure on June 30, 2016, I recognize the importance of an orderly transition. If the Council desires, I would be amenable to offering my services as needed this summer to assist during the transition or to continue in some fashion until you have selected my successor.

As I mentioned, I did not come to this decision lightly and it is one of the hardest that I have ever had to make. I appreciate those of you who have taken the time to encourage me to think about my future with the City.

Finally, I want to acknowledge the support and effort that my staff has demonstrated over the past three years. It has been extraordinary. Our accomplishments as a team are too numerous to list today. I strongly believe that we have built a critical foundation for the City that will ensure that Cambridge remains a vibrant and desirable place to live, work, and play well into the future.

Because of the dedication of the staff and City Council, I have every confidence that Cambridge will be able to address any challenge it may face in the future. My heartfelt thanks to all of you for trusting me with the honor of being City Manager.

Very truly yours, Richard C. Rossi, City Manager

Councillor Maher stated he understood that this was a difficult decision for Mr. Rossi and as Mr. Rossi prepares to have this chapter of his life close he noted the impact that Mr. Rossi has had on Cambridge will live on for a long time. He spoke about the commitment of Mr. Rossi in areas such as affordable housing, the library and Danehy Park which will live on for many generations. He informed Mr. Rossi that all that he has done for this community will be celebrated and there is life beyond City Hall.

Mayor Simmons acknowledged and thanked Jane Rossi. She stated that spouses go along the journey with public service. She spoke about Mr. Rossi working in the city he loves. She respected the decision made by Mr. Rossi and added that the City Council wanted him to have the life he deserves. She spoke about Mr. Rossi's open door policy. She noted that moral has improved and the community feels included. She spoke about the services and the leadership that Cambridge possesses. She further noted that Mr. Rossi has never been disagreeable. She acknowledge the staff assembled by the City Manager.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that he is happy because this was a difficult decision for the City Manager. He spoke about all the matters that the City Manager has to deal with. The beauty of the system is that there are checks and balances. He spoke about the NLC and the fact that there are communities who do not have the services that Cambridge has. We take many things for granted. He thanked Mr. Rossi for his 45 years of service to Cambridge.

Councillor Kelley thanked Mr. Rossi for his work. He stated that he would vote enthusiastically YES if Mr. Rossi wanted to continue his employment. He added that respected Mr. Rossi.

Councillor Toomey stated that his wife and children have had activities that Mr. Rossi has missed over the years. He spoke about Mr. Rossi's commitment to the City and to the businesses. He added that Mr. Rossi has lived through experiences of growing up in Cambridge. He spoke about the Water treatment plant that Mr. Rossi was involved in; Cambridge Health Alliance and the teen centers. He stated a lot has been accomplished working together. Cambridge is the envy of the country. Mr. Rossi's imprint is on Cambridge for many years to come. He wished Mr. Rossi good health. Mr. Rossi commented that he would not give up the years he spent growing up in Cambridge. He learned how to deal with people. Cambridge's richness is the diversity of the population.

Councillor Devereux stated that Mr. Rossi was quick to win her over. She has learned a lot and appreciated his patience. Mr. Rossi stated that this administration strives to provide information in a timely fashion. He spoke about the balance between peoples work and private life.

Councillor Carlone stated that Mr. Rossi enjoyed his job before becoming City Manager and it was different. He stated that everything Mr. Rossi stated that he would do as he became City Manager he has lived up to. The message at NLC was that the key to success is working together. He expressed the emotion displayed by Mr. Rossi today and for his family. He stated that Mr. Rossi's humanity came through on many occasions, especially today. He stated that Mr. Rossi and his team have always been open. He expressed thanks to Mr. Rossi.

Councillor Mazen stated that he was thankful for Mr. Rossi and his authenticity. His family's support really stands out today.

Councillor Cheung stated that he is proud of the decision made to make Mr. Rossi the City Manager. He wished Cambridge could keep you on longer, but family comes first.

Deputy City Manager Lisa Peterson stated that there will be opportunity for the staff to speak about what it is like to work with Mr. Rossi. She spoke about his commitment to staff, community and providing services. All are sad about this but Mr. Rossi has left the City in good hands with this leadership team.

Assistant City Manager for Human Service Programs Ellen Semonoff spoke about Mr. Rossi's commitment to the development of staff at all levels has been outstanding as both Deputy City Manager and City Manager. She further stated that he is sometimes the person that says no, he always wants to say yes.

Assistant City Manager for Fiscal Affairs Louis DePasquale stated that he first met Mr. Rossi when he was 10 years old. If he needed anything Mr. Rossi was there for him. He is proud that Mr. Rossi is his friend. This is the right decision for Mr. Rossi and his family. He stated that he has attended Rossi University for forty-one years.

Assistant City Manager for Community Development Department Iram Farooq stated that it has been an incredible time working with Mr. Rossi. This is difficult, but it is the right decision for Mr. Rossi and his family. What we have learned from Mr. Rossi will stay with us.

Councillor Maher noted that today's hearing is about Mr. Rossi and his announcement. He stated that there will be a hearing on Mar 23, 2016 to lay out the process for the selection of a new City Manager and the timeline. This is a happy and conflicting day for Mr. Rossi and his family. He further explained that there will be an open process; there is no template to look at; there has never been an open search for a City Manager in this form of government in 75 years. The City Council will have an extensive search for a City Manager and will involve the public. The development of process will be importance and he spoke about the necessity for confidentially of the process. The process hearings to lay out the process will be held in the day. Any hearings with candidates will happen at the convenience of the public. He stated that the City Solicitor, Personnel Director and the Purchasing Agent will be key components to this process.

Councillor Maher opened public comment at 11:45am.

Carol O'Hare, 172 Magazine Street, praised Mr. Rossi. She stated that he is tuned in, made excellent appointments and has improved public information access. He is different from the prior City Manager. She told of her experience with the City Manager.

James Williamson, 1000 Jackson Place, commended Mr. Rossi for his decision. He noted that Councillor Mazen has stated that Mr. Rossi has done a lot to heal the City. He stated that if you were born and live here you should be able to continue to live here. He stated that this is an opportunity to go forward.

Robert Winters, 366 Broadway, spoke about the best form of advocacy in the City is to identify city staff and get the ear of the City Council and work with respect to get things done. He noted that Mr. Rossi and Ms. Peterson were the inside people for him when trying to implement recycling in the City.

Anthony Galluccio stated that Mr. Rossi has a gleam in his eye when he speaks about Cambridge; this is personal to him. He spoke about Mr. Rossi's pride in the youth of the City. He stated that there are many instances of Mr. Rossi's love for the City. He spoke of Mr. Rossi's involvement with the youth centers, Danehy Park, War Memorial, CRLS and the main library. Mr. Rossi leaves a legacy and an example of what a City Manager should be.

Councillor Maher closed public comment at 11:55am.

Councillor Maher thanked all present for their attendance.

On a motion by Vice Mayor McGovern the hearing adjourned at 11:55am.

For the Committee,
Councillor David P. Maher, Chair

Committee Report #2
The Ordinance Committee, comprised of the entire membership of the City Council, held a public hearing on Mar 24, 2016 beginning at 3:01pm in the Sullivan Chamber.

The purpose of the hearing was to discuss a zoning petition by the Sage Cannabis, Inc. to amend the Zoning Ordinance in Section 20.700 Medical Marijuana Overlay Districts by creating an additional Medical Marijuana Overlay District (MMD-3). The new MMD-3 District would be coterminous with the Business B-2 base zoning district on the northerly side of Massachusetts Avenue between Dana and Ellery Streets. The amendment would also create a new section 20.705.1.

Present at the hearing were Councillor Carlone and Councillor Cheung, Co-Chairs of the Committee; Councillor Devereux; Councillor Maher; Vice Mayor McGovern; Jeff Roberts, Land Use and Zoning Project Planner, Community Development Department; and City Clerk Donna P. Lopez.

Also present were Michael Dundas, Chief Executive Officer, Sage Cannabis, Inc., 13 Commercial Way,

Milford; Attorney Sean Hope, 675 Mass. Ave.; Jongyoon Han, 12 Ellery Street; Nathaniel Avrill, 30 Victoria Street, Somerville; Paul Overgang, 22 Milton Street; Cara Burnham, 2 Hillsboro Rd.; Marybeth DeGray, 291 Huron Avenue; John Cassell; Steve Jiffe; Mark Vlachos; Tyler Richards, 34 Park Street; Pat Owens, Brookline, MA; Valerio Romano, 109 State Street, Boston; Nichol Snow, 190 Bridge Street, Salem; Monique Pichette, 1289 Highland Avenue, Fall River; Stephen Mandile, 27 Henry Street, Uxbridge; Robert Goldstein, 14 Wilbur Street; Frank Gerratana, 632 Mass. Ave.; Gary Dmytryk, 2440 Mass. Ave.; Jorden Tishle, 2285 Mass. Ave.; Jeremiah MacKinnon, 25 Horne Street, Methuen; Peter Wender, 10 Dana Street; Nakie Theodorsda, 431 Mass. Ave.; Francis Donovan, 42 Irving Street; Jeanie Sorrow; and Anatasia Mathis.

Councillor Cheung convened the hearing and explained the purpose. He stated that the meeting is being audio and video recorded. He stated that if the public has written comments they could be given to the Clerk or be e-mailed. He stated the comments have been received and will be made part of the report. He outlined the format of the hearing. Councillor Cheung invited the petitioners to come forward.

Attorney Hope introduced Michael Dundas, Chief Executive Officer, Sage Cannabis, Inc., 13 Commercial Way, Milford. He stated that Mr. Dundas will address the operational aspect of the petition, specifically the facility that is located in the district. Information will be provided about how the medical marijuana program has evolved and some of the challenges for operators. He stated that the operators have to overcome many obstacles. Attorney Hope explained the revision to the medical marijuana. The Department of Public Health (DPH) has a comprehensive set of regulations. He spoke about the financial aspect of the medical marijuana program. The dispensaries are non-profit entities and are only able to take on debt. He stated that the myths will be dispelled about medical marijuana and facts will be provided about medical marijuana. This petition is proposing a third medical marijuana district between Dana and Ellery Streets. He stated that part of the proposal was to make sure that the existing overlay was included in the criteria. This criteria was preserved while adding an additional set of criteria that would make it more of a general business district. The proposed district is outside of Harvard and Central Squares, is on Mass. Avenue and is well served by public transportation. A map is included in the presentation that shows available parking, handicapped spaces and different parking options. The original medical marijuana overlays included accessible parking. He explained that one of the major changes since 2012 is that the medical marijuana program was regulated with only 35 state-wide licenses which created a more regional approach and it made sense that Alewife and North Point would be the designated locations because of the proximity to Route 93 and Route 2. He explained that the DPH has changed its regulations so that there is no longer a state-wide cap and there can be unlimited amount of licenses.

Cities and towns are allowed to make their own determinations. This has also provided that there can be a facility to cultivate the marijuana outside the City and have retail only locations. This is what is being proposed. Sage has tried for 2 years to find a location within the two districts. Sage has exhausted their search and have found a location that fits the criteria. One thing that will allow this to be compatible with the criteria is a prominent commercial corridor. The use will be relegated to below grade or the second floor. The DPH regulations prohibits signs or awnings. It was appropriate to keep this away from street frontage. This location has below grade and second floor office opportunities. There is criteria in place that will not allow a cluster of medical marijuana facilities. It is feasible to have more than one facility in this district if it is appropriate to do so. In addition to the use limitation there is also a size limitation of no longer than 10,000 square feet. He explained that under the zoning retail that is over 10,000 square feet requires off site and loading zones. Also under the criteria only 70% of the 10,000 square feet must be used for patient services. Storage and office space would be used for the remainder of 30%. He spoke about the capacity, number of patients and the hours of operation will be addressed in the Business B district. The existing two zones criteria will work with what is being proposed. He added that the two zones have not yield any facilities. This proposal will provide better access with a ready, willing and able license dispensary agent. Sage has a cultivation center in Milton. He stated that the petitioner wants to get through this process so that they can go before the Planning Board for a Special Permit. He stated that the petitioner has done outreach to the community for 8 months.

Mr. Dundas, President and CEO, Sage Cannabis, Inc gave a PowerPoint Presentation (ATTACHMENT A). He spoke about the use. The Cambridge facility will be a retail only medical marijuana dispensary. This facility is not opened to the general public. To obtain access to the facility patients must be registered with MDPH and have a certification card. There are no physicians on site and onsite usage of medicine will not be allowed. He explained that one of the important regulation is that medical marijuana dispensaries are required to operate as non-profit, per chapter 180 MGL. Once a doctor certifies a patients they must register themselves with DPH and then is issued a medical marijuana program card.

Minors are never allowed in the dispensaries. If a minor requires medical marijuana it will be the parent who will be registered. All licenses are reviewed and renewed yearly by DPH. All facilities have 24 hour video surveillance 7 days a week and the records are kept for 90 days. Patients are personally escorted by personnel in the dispensary. He explained the security of the planting and growth process and are inventoried and bar coded. The products are prepackaged and could be traced back to the seedling. He outlined the look of the facility and patients are escorted by sales personnel. The hours of operation and the number of patients being 40-100 daily with the patient visit being between 10-15 minutes. He invited the City Council to tour the facility in Milford. He explained the medicines that will be dispensed. He outlined the licensing process. The criteria for the original licensure was for regional dispensaries. In August 2015 the DPH changed the licensing process, lifted the cap on the licensure so that there is no limit to the licensure. The regional criteria was eliminated. He stated that the map shows the two existing zones and the new zone.

Attorney Hope outlined the new zone and the back of the building has a parking lot with a driveway next door which can be used as a loading zone for deliveries of the products. The petition is in conversation with the landowner to rent parking spaces. The site would be located below grade and is ADA compliant.

He stated that parking counts were done at 1/4 mile and 500 feet and there are metered parking spaces and the # 1 bus traverses down Mass. Ave. This locations meets the requirement of 500 feet away from schools and parks.

Vice Mayor McGovern asked about the security measures and the research of other locations. Mr. Dundas spoke about security and it was suggested by the public that this type of use lends itself to criminal activity. Research was done on this allegation. Those statements and assumptions are not borne out with the data. He stated security measure are prudent; there are security cameras and security agent on site to check patient credentials. Patients will escorted out onto the sidewalk to prevent loitering.

Patients must pay for medical marijuana; insurance does not cover medical marijuana. Vice Mayor McGovern asked about the pricing of the medical marijuana. Mr. Dundas responded that he matches illicit prices and prices range from$10-50. The average price around the country is $50. Vice Mayor McGovern asked is it difficult to obtain products from Sage and sell it on the street. Mr. Dundas stated that people who come to medical marijuana dispensaries are people who are ill and whose physicians believe the medical marijuana is a viable option for their patients. The average patient is over the age of 50.

Councillor Carlone’s plan was to have a different dispensary. He asked if Sage had a dispensary now.

Mr. Dundas responded that final touches are being put on the Milford facility. Councillor Carlone question the difference of the product. Mr. Dundas stated that this product is different than on street marijuana; it is cleaner, higher quality and stronger medicinally. Products are test by third parties for strict regulations. Councillor Carlone stated that medical marijuana is different than recreational marijuana. Mr. Dundas stated that a patient cannot get into his facility unless certified by a doctor and DPH.

Councillor Maher stated that he is not opposed to having a dispensary in the City. He is skeptical about this petition because it is not being looked at with objective criteria. He stated that the criteria adopted by the City Council needs to be looked into and the adopted criteria has not revealed any dispensary and it has been limiting. There is no other B2 district. This is an exception for one-half of one block. This just does not seem right. This is placing the City at risk for other people who have not been able to locate a medical marijuana because it does not meet the adopted criteria. He wanted a pause on this and ask the City where changes could be made to the adopted criteria. This petitioner is a reputable operator. He stated that objective criteria should be developed. The City needs to decide if the restrictions in place are necessary and why were they put into place. This is an issue of fairness. He suggested that the petitioner meet with the Police Commissioner. This is a special favor for one company and this should not be done.

Councillor Devereux stated that this is about services for patients. She stated that the Planning Board recommended adoption of this proposal and expanding the medical marijuana to additional areas. She felt that medical marijuana should be added to the table of uses in a commercial district and would still require the Board of Zoning Appeal and/or Planning Board special permit process for the use. She did not want to prevent a viable medical marijuana dispensary from opening.

Vice Mayor McGovern asked Attorney Hope if this location meets the state requirement for distance from parks and schools. He commented about the numerous schools and parks in Cambridge and there are not many locations in Cambridge that will meet the state requirements. This should be looked at city-wide. The City Council does rezone blocks in the City; this was done at Mass+Main because there was a belief that building a residential building would be beneficial to the City. Sage is not doing anything that they are not allowed to do. This is not preventing any other facility from doing this same thing. Attorney Hope stated that the City has partnered with landowners for a desired outcome such as retail. In this situation there are few applicants that can create a medical marijuana and meet the requirements. The benefit to the citywide is the data and to have this location work within the city. This is an opportunity to get data and whether this use in this location is viable. He stated that data will be given to the Police Commissioner who they will meet with next week. He stated that this is an urgent care facility and this type of facility is not located where it is not accessible. Vice Mayor McGovern stated that medical marijuana is a much better pain management and is less harmful than opiates.

Councillor Carlone stated that from zoning perspective Councillor Maher is correct that we should be looking broader. He stated that a simple overlay of the 500 foot distance in a business district can tell where this makes sense. He stated that the Planning Board should be encouraged to do this because it meets both criteria and still move forward with this petition. Councillor Carlone asked about competition for Sage in Cambridge because of the density may lead to competition if the demand is made. Mr. Dundas stated that he is fine with competing on quality of service and product.

Jeff Roberts, Land Use and Project Planner, Community Development Department outlined the zoning issues. Current zoning established medical marijuana overlay district is the way that Cambridge regulates the location of registered medical marijuana dispensaries. This zoning was put into place in 2013 following the promulgated state-wide regulations. Two overlay districts were established, one in Alewife and one in North Point. He explained that registered marijuana dispensaries would be allowed with a special permit from the Planning Board. A study was done by CDD on state regulations and how the regulations would play out. This was a six months process. He explained that a series of factors were reviewed as to how the district would be chosen. The factors that were reviewed were allowed uses would only be allowed in commercial areas, availability of transportation, including regional roadways and public transportation. The state regulation at the time established a cap on the number of dispensaries allowed state-wide. It was thought that there would only be one dispensary in Cambridge which would be servicing a larger area. The state has changed the practice of registering dispensaries and that there is no longer a cap and that local communities can control where the dispensaries would be located this factor may need to be reviewed. Public Safety was the third factor. The dispensaries would be located in areas where emergency vehicles would have easy, convenient access. He stated that Bus. B2 meets this criteria. He stated that urban character was the fourth criteria. In many cases the security requirements would conflict with the design objectives for retail areas in the City. He explained that a marijuana dispensary would not allow physical or visual access for the general public. In this petition this is addressed by locating the dispensary off the ground floor. The final factor was the 500 foot buffer. The state regulation establishes the 500 foot buffer but that local communities can establish their own buffer.

He explained that when an application came to the Planning Board the applicant has to show where such uses are located and could include schools, parks, gymnasiums or dance programs oriented towards children. The Planning Board would have to take an inventory of the uses and if the uses are within the 500 foot distance the applicant would have to show that there is adequate buffering and that the dispensary would not interfere with the operation of the adjacent facility. There are issues with federal enforcement standards which was a concern which may not be a concern now. The Planning Board gave a positive recommendation (ATTACHMENT B). He stated that the Bus. B2 district presented an appropriate location for a registered medical marijuana dispensary. The Planning Board did have concerns about the urban design but was satisfied that the location of the dispensary would not be on the ground floor. The Planning Board was in favor of this proposal moving forward.

At 4:04 Councillor Cheung open the hearing to public comment.

Jongyoon Han, 12 Ellery Street, stated that he opposed the petition. He stated that there is a crises for opiate abuse and even with the security mechanism and safety check these abuses can and do happen. No one can avoid these abuses and this places a burden on the community to handle. This is located near Harvard University and MIT and these students aged 18-22 have just left their parents and are impressionable. He is concerned about the abuse. He stated that the risks and benefits need to be weight.

The risk is high at this location. There is a ballot question in November on the legalization of recreational marijuana use and if this passes what is the impact on this facility and on the community.

Councillor Cheung explained that there would be a separate process for recreational marijuana.

Paul Overgang stated that he has two businesses in Harvard Square. He is one of the nine dispensary license holders. He supports Sage and the location on Massachusetts Avenue. He stated that he is happy that the City Council is exploring a new medical marijuana zoning in Harvard Square. This could benefit Harvard Square patients and their access.

Cara Crabb Burnham, Northeastern Institute of Cannabis, she stated her support of Sage Cannabis. She stated that it is important to get the dispensary open. This makes streets safer by keeping this product off the street and not going to children. This will create jobs who will use other local businesses. This will be a benefit to Cambridge. She submitted written testimony (ATTACHMENT C).

Marybeth Degray, stated that she is the owner of Cannabis Consultants, resident at 291 Huron Avenue and office manager of Cannabis Specialty Medical Practice. She stated that she is a graduate of Northeast Institute of Cannabis and a PTSD cannabis patient. She stated her support for the Sage petition. She spoke of patients who want safe access within travel distance of cannabis. This establishment will benefit the community without imposing a risk because of its retail versus cultivation designation. These facilities serve the most vulnerable people and these patients do not deserve discrimination. She stated that she would not travel to Alewife and that she would prefer coming to the middle of town for her medicine, and did not want to be treated as a criminal. She added that Cannabis is not an entrance drug; it is an exit drug from pharmaceutical and narcotics.

Tyler Richards, Signature Properties, a retail brokerage firm, stated that it has been difficult to site with the current zoning. He stated that his concern is that the BB2 zoning is very restrictive.

Pat Owens, Brookline, cancer patient supported clean cannabis growth. The stuff on the street is dangerous. Clean pot is for patients like her. Please help us; listen to us. We need what we are asking for. It is not to get high. The petitioners are asking to do the right thing for patients that need this.

John Cassell, stated that he supported the use of medical marijuana to deal with illness effectively, but he did not understand why marijuana is treated differently than other drugs. He noted that little of this involves medicine and doctors and how this looks like an Apple Store. Patients should get this medicine in a safe way, but this commercial industry is not the right way to do this. He spoke about the location will be known and seen by all for being dangerous, the 100 patients seen daily will be recognized as well as the security. This location is dangerous and is located between Harvard and MIT, CRLS and the library; there are 100,000 students within these facility. He spoke about it not being economically viable to sell this product on the street. He submitted a written statement (ATTACHMENT D).

Nicole Snow, Executive Director, Mass. Patient Advocacy Alliance, stated that she has been working hard to implement the medical marijuana program in the state. She stated that there are only six medical marijuana facility that have opened their doors in the state with 24,000 patients in the commonwealth.

She spoke about the location and the conditions by which the marijuana will be grown by Sage in a controlled environment. She spoke about the process for licensure of these facilities is restrictive and detrimental to the patients. She urged opening the Sage facility. Patients need access to medical marijuana. It would be a great benefit to Cambridge to work with these petitioners.

Monique Pichette stated that she is a veteran of the Marine Corp, nurse, mother and a two time cancer survivor. She noted that as we age life circumstance tend to change our outlook and beliefs. She stated that she was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 43 and after a mastectomy she was supported to be clear of cancer. Eighteen months later her cancer came back. She stated that medical marijuana gave life back to her. She lost a job because of her use of medical marijuana because she tested positive for THC but other nurses who used opiates are allowed to work. She stated that education is important. Cannabis is being used as an exit drug for opiates and has helped with PTSD. She stated that she is appalled to the opiates given to the elderly. She stated that she has trouble accessing her medicine. There is no physical addiction to marijuana. Opiates are cover by health insurance; but she has trouble paying for her medical marijuana.

Stephen Mandile, stated that he was a 100% disabled veteran. His spine is fused, multiple discs have been removed, he has brain injury and there is nerve damage in his legs. He was given opiates from the Army for 11 years. He spoke about how bad he felt physically. He now uses medical marijuana and no longer uses opiates and his insurance does not pay for his medication. He places his family and himself in jeopardy to obtain his medical marijuana medicine.

Robert Goldstein, 14 Wilbur Street, Boston, stated that he is a member of the Cambridge business community and that he would be excited to see this facility come to this area. This is highly regulated medicine. He is in the ALS research and board member of Sage. He stated that ALS patients benefit from the use of medical marijuana. He spoke about the benefit and that Sage will run a top notch facility. He urged the City Council to support this zoning petition.

Frank Gerratana, 632 Mass. Avenue, stated his support for the zone change. The original zoning is not adequate for the city. Anything new and unfamiliar can be scary. This is a benefit for patients and no risk to the community.

Gary Dmytryk, 2440 Mass. Avenue, stated that he is a member of the Cambridge Commission for Persons with Disabilities Board. He read a communication from Michael Muehe, Executive Director, Commission for Persons with Disability, in favor of medical marijuana. Mr. Dmytryk stated that since he has been on the Commission he has been asked what is happening with medical marijuana since the passage of the ballot question.

Jordan Tishle, stated that he is resident of Brookline and works in Cambridge. He stated that this conversation seems to be with the doctor’s perspective. He is a Harvard physician and works at the emergency room at the VA and has opened a small private practice in Cambridge specializing in cannabis therapeutics. He stated that he has not seen any patients that have been hurt by cannabis but has seen veterans hurt by drug and alcohol use. He spoke about the value of cannabis and that it helps patients tremendously. He set up this practice to provide access to appropriate patients to dispense cannabis. This is a discussion about zoning. He spoke about 60-80 year old patients who are not getting appropriate medicine and people who have horrible pain and cannot function. Location for these patients is important. Elderly patients traveling to Alewife was a hardship. He stated that transportation is important financially as well as access to medical marijuana. He explained that patients are given opiates and become addictive and are weaned off opiates with the use of cannabis.

Peter Wender, 10 Dana Street, stated that he is 300 feet from the proposed location. He supported medical marijuana use. He spoke against the zoning proposal. He spoke about the pending ballot question for recreational marijuana and that it will most likely occur. He stated that this is a cash only business.

He spoke about crime in this context. He read headlines about crime around medical marijuana facilities. Security around facilities goes down, but not further away. He spoke about a video arcade business previously at this location and the crime and breaks in as this was a cash facility. Please do not make him a victim of crime again by locating a cash businesses at this site. He wanted security surveillance increased to indemnify residents for the losses they sustain not covered by their insurance.

Jeremiah MacKinnon, 25 Horne Street, Methuen, stated that he is a patient and that he supports Sage Cannabis at this location. He further stated that it is good that it is close to public transportation. He stated that patients had to go through ballot initiative to legalize medical marijuana but opiates are a Scheduled II drug and is available to be prescribed. He stated that according to the federal government marijuana is a Schedule I drug and is more restrictive and it cannot be prescribed. Cannabis marijuana is a medicine for people who need them and it has never contributed to a death. He urged the City Council to support this. This is not a cash only business; debit and credit cards are taken.

Nakie Theodossa, 931 Mass. Avenue, stated her objection to the location. She stated that she is concerned about the safety of the neighborhood. She spoke about the new library and the renovation of two schools in the area and these children will walk past this location daily and they should be considered. The fabric of the neighborhood will change with this petition.

Francis Donovan, 42 Irving Street, stated that this petition is to give the public what it needs and wants. He stated that the need for medical marijuana was thoroughly researched and the voters voted 80% in favor of medical marijuana. The City Council established two medical marijuana zones but after passage the Legislature expanded the number of authorized medical marijuana dispensaries that outmoded the two Cambridge zones. He stated that over 2,000 Cambridge residents qualify for state certified medical marijuana treatment. He stated that action and access is needed now. People need this relief and it is legal to get this and the controls set up by Sage are tighter than any found in a pharmacy. Cambridge should approve broader zones but the zone is available now for treatment for patients.

Jean Sorrow stated that she will be using this dispensary. She spoke as a patient diagnosed with cancer in 2013. She had side effects from treatment and medical marijuana released her from her pain. She stated that recently she was told that her cancer has spread. Recreational marijuana is different from medical marijuana. Children walk by package stores and drug stores which are more dangerous. She explained how expensive it is to open a medical marijuana dispensary. Licensees will not jeopardize their license because of the expense and the licensure process. There are 24,000 registered patients and only 6 dispensaries in Massachusetts.

Anastasia Mathis took care of her quadriplegic sister. She has been diagnosed with ovary cancer. She does not use medical marijuana. She stated that her sister's medicine were stolen by her caregiver. She stated that her sister was weaned off opiates with marijuana. This is an exit drug. She came back to Cambridge because of the medical care available. She stated that cannabis is being studied for cancer.

The only product that has gone from seed to product to retail is cannabis. She supported the Sage Cannabis petition.

Vice Mayor McGovern closed public comment at 5:08pm.

Councillor Cheung thanked veterans for their service and the people who have shared their stories. If marijuana is a medicine, he cannot go to a hospital and have a prescription filled, like he could for an opiate or pain medication. He stated that the state changed the rules, not that the City Council dropped the all. This is a new type of business. Under the old guidelines the facilities were to be accessible to major highways and public transportation. He stated that the two zones established were guidelines. It is hard to demarcate large areas to site facilities. He prefers to judge applicants one by one and to have the public express their concerns. There is a very urgent need for the treatment of medical marijuana. He does not want to wait longer.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that the conversation was interesting and frustrating. There is little land that is not near Harvard and MIT. He spoke about prescriptions issued by doctors that he has no knowledge of what is in the prescription. He had no tolerance for people who stated that they support medical marijuana, but not in my neighborhood. He stated that older people and disabled veterans will be forced to buy marijuana on the street.

The following e-mails were received as follows:
Communication from Mary H. White, 2 Arlington Street, stating her misgivings about the City Council approving a third district for a medical marijuana dispensary (ATTACHMENT E).
Communication from Carol O'Hare 172 Magazine Street, expressing concern that the zoning amendment is another instance of expedience trumping sound, holistic planning and zoning (ATTACHMENT F).

At this time Vice Mayor McGovern moved that the petition be forwarded to the full City Council with a favorable recommendation. The motion carried on a voice vote of five members.

Councillor Cheung thanked all those present for their attendance.

The hearing adjourned at 5:17pm.

For the Committee,
Councillor Leland Cheung, Co-Chair
Councillor Dennis J. Carlone, Co-Chair

Committee Report #3
The Government Operations, Rules and Claims Committee held a public hearing on Mar 23, 2016 beginning at 10:09am in the Sullivan Chamber.

The purpose of the hearing was to discuss the development of the process for the selection of a new City Manager.

Present at the hearing were Councillor Maher, Chair of the Committee; Councillor Cheung; Councillor Mazen; Vice Mayor McGovern; Councillor Toomey; Councillor Devereux; Councillor Kelley; Lisa Peterson, Deputy City Manager; Nancy Glowa, City Solicitor; Sheila Keady Rawson, Personnel Director; Amy Witts, Purchasing Agent; Maryellen Carvello, Executive Department; Lee Gianetti, Communications and Public Information Director; Taha Jennings, Assistant to the City Manager; Michelle Monsegur, Budget Analyst; Neal Alpert, Chief of Staff to Mayor Simmons; Christian Schlachte; Dan Schwartz; Will Durbin; David Mattei; Fred Fantini, School Committee Member; Paula Crane, Deputy City Clerk; and City Clerk Donna P. Lopez.

Also present were John Hawkinson, 2 Clinton Street; Peter Valentine, 37 Brookline Street; Lee Farris, 269 Norfolk Street; Hasson Rashid, 820 Mass. Ave.; Robert Winters, 366 Broadway; Daniel Lander, 74R Fayerweather Street; Michael Brandon, 27 Seven Pines Avenue; and Nancy Ryan, 4 Ashburton Place.

Councillor Maher convened the hearing and explained the purpose. He stated that the meeting is being privately recorded by both audio and visual devices. He distributed an agenda (ATTACHMENT A). He stated that there is no real formula to look at for hiring the City Manager because this has not been done in the past. He stated that a more formal process has been used to hire the Superintendent of Schools and having just done a search for our new Superintendent we could adapt that process for hiring the City Manager. Hiring a professional search firm is the first discussion point. A private search firm or a preapproved state vendor could be chosen. The School Committee opted to hire a professional search firm and played a part in the evaluation of the firm chosen. All these firms are subject to public bidding laws.

He stated that the ICMA may also play a role. In the end only one search firm applied for the Superintendent of School. Councillor Maher asked the Purchasing Agent what the difference is between an RFP and going directly with a state-approved vendor.

Amy Witts, Purchasing Agent, stated that the Collins Center at UMass is the only firm she could identify that is exempt from public bidding laws. She explained that the contracts with the Commonwealth are exempt from public bidding laws and the City would not have to go through an RFP process. The scope for other firms and the evaluation criteria must be specific with the RFP process and because of the bid laws the scope and evaluation flexibility is non-existent once a contract is signed. She stated that firms generally cannot met the scope and the evaluation and do not apply.

Councillor Toomey questioned why out of 15 firms only one applied. Ms. Witts stated that many firms stated that they did not have the capacity or staff to meet the scope requirements. Some firms also had commitments to other contracts that would overlap.

Councillor Maher asked about Collins Center and the past experience that the City has had with this firm. Deputy City Manager Peterson stated that the Collins Center was used for recruitment for the Director of Traffic, Parking and Transportation. She stated that the city did not have the kind of robust outreach program in terms of public process than what was done for the Superintendent of Schools.

Councillor Maher stated that the City Council needs to decide to use search firm or a pre- approved vendor such as the Collins Center. It is important to go forward with the development of a scope of services for the position. There were many focus groups in the hiring process for the Superintendent of Schools. The public offered input into the process and he wanted this same type of process for the hiring the City Manager. He wanted a concerted effort made to reach out to the public. He asked what is a reasonable time to do a search and can this be done within six months and be inclusive and not be cumbersome. He stated that we should be able to begin the focus groups in late May and continue into June which will help shape the leadership profile.

Councillor Kelley asked about the focus groups. Councillor Maher responded that the focus group will help to shape the leadership profile and identify attributes needed for the next City Manager. Councillor Kelley stated that he was confused. Councillor Maher stated that the City Council needs to decide if we want to hire a professional search firm or go with the state approved vendor who does searches and has a local record and with whom we have worked with the in the past; both are professional search firms.

Councillor Kelley stated that the question is how to get to the search firms.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that he participated in a search for a Superintendent of Schools while a member of the School Committee. He stated that the search firm was helpful to the School Committee and it was worth the investment for the work performed. He wanted an experienced search firm dealing with governmental units. He stated that he wanted a search firm that handles outreach and he process that we want to have. In terms of the length of the process, he stated that he would prefer a balance between not wanting to rush while doing due diligence and not taking years to conclude. He wanted a City Manager for a stable amount of time. He stated that the search firm runs the focus groups which could be held every day. He spoke about if the applicants were unacceptable he wanted to open the process more.

Councillor Toomey stated that he has no problem looking at the Collins Center and this should be done as soon as possible to have a firm ready to engage in the process right away. When advertised that applicants resumes go the firm for screening there would a significant amount of interest in the job; he did not want the City Council involved in this part. He spoke about the confidentiality of an applicant who is currently working to have their job not jeopardized. He wanted the process completed by mid-September.

This leaves enough time to engage the public in the process. This is the most important decision that the City Council makes. At the end of the day the nine City Councillors make this decision. He participated in hiring a Superintendent of Schools when he was on the School Committee. He commented that this is the City Council's most sacred duty to make this decision and he wanted a decision made by Sept 1, 2016. This is an exciting time for the city.

Councillor Devereux asked about the possibility of talking to the Collins Center and to have them present their credentials. She had a list of search firms that she had received at the NLC and urged contacting the MMA about search firms that focus on hiring City Managers. It is important to have new city manager onboard in the fall. She expressed concern about the process and the summer recess. She asked about the real time frame.

Councillor Mazen stated that a six month process could be possible. He asked if Mr. Rossi would be willing to spend three months in training. Mr. Rossi was not present and would need to be asked this. He asked if internal candidates would be included. He added that having internal candidates will effect who will apply. Councillor Toomey stated that all applications will go to the search firm. It is not the role of the City Council to accept applications. Personnel Director, Sheila Keady Rawson stated that for a department heard or leadership position they would treat internal and external applicants at the same time.

Councillor Mazen stated that the action of the City Council and the search firm would be different if new applicants are going up against internal applicants. Councillor Maher stated that with the Superintendent of Schools search there were no internal candidates for the position. He added that the search firm should be accustomed to handling this situation.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that it is the City Council who votes for the City Manager. He stated that if there is a strong internal candidate and the City Council is looking at this it could back fire, but the search firm deals with this. He spoke about applicants that do not work for the City but have a relationship with the City. He stated that sometimes a search comes down to people that are relatively local. Things do  slowdown in the summer and he stated that he did not understand why things come to a halt. The City Council has to do this job. He expects this summer to be busy and does not want something rushed or delayed because of the summer.

Councillor Devereux stated that in the past she has applied for jobs and the job description will say "strong internal candidate," She did not want this on the job description because it deters other candidates. She further stated that the cost of housing is also an issue in terms of helping a candidate realize the cost of housing in the area.

Councillor Mazen noted that the search process for the Superintendent had a good outcome. The reputation of this search firm is that they recycle candidates. He asked if that there is any reason that the Collins Center cannot participate in an RFP process. Ms. Witts stated that there is nothing that legal bars them from doing so. Councillor Mazen asked what the process will cost. Ms. Witts responded that this will depend on scope. She stated that the average cost for the Superintendent search was $40,000-$50,000 and the City Manager search may cost more. Councillor Mazen stated that he wanted information from other cities about the search firms used. Councillor Toomey stated that it is his understanding that contacting the firms is not allowed. Ms. Witts stated that there should be no contact with additional firms once the RFP is out. Councillor Mazen stated that he wanted to inform more search firms. Ms. Witts stated that purchasing is formulating a list of search firms. She further stated that the RFP is governed by 30B. We would have to establish an evaluation committee which would see all of the proposals and compare them against each other based on the rating scheme that has been developed. She stated that the evaluation committee is not privy to the price proposals; they remain sealed and are separate. Vice Mayor McGovern asked about the selection as to the cheapest. Ms. Wits explained that if the lowest price is the highest ranked they would get the contract. She stated that in terms of making any other decision, she would confer with the City Council. In the RFP process they have to document why the lowest bidder was not selected. Councillor Mazen stated that in the end, it is not appropriate for the body to abdicate going from 100 to 20 applicants.

Councillor Maher stated that he wanted Ms. Witts to go forward with drafting a scope of services. It is important to have a date in place that we are working towards. He stated that Town Hall Meetings are a good way to perceive how a candidate views their role in the City. Feedback forms from the public would be provided to the City Council. Focus groups and one-on-one would help to develop the leadership profile. He stated that he wanted exhaustive recruitment process. Councillor Maher spoke about the complexity of the open meeting law and that at no time in the screening or confidential phase of the process can there be more than four City Councillors involved in the process. He spoke about the trust of the process.

City Solicitor Nancy Glowa stated that under the Open Meeting Law the only way the full City Council could consider candidates is in public. If the City Council wanted to evaluate candidates, nothing would be confidential and that could be sensitive for those who do not want their names known. A screening committee could evaluate candidates and make recommendations. A screening committee could have up to four City Councillors who can screen candidates and select finalist in Executive Session. These would remain confidential. Councillor Maher explained that in the Superintendent process the first phase was a Letter of Interest and second was the application. He stated that 55 candidates expressed interest and 45 Candidates completed the application. The search firm narrowed the 45 candidates down to 7-9 and then recommended that people be interviewed by the panel. All the interviews were confidential and then was narrowed down to three. At this point the candidates’ names and positions would become public. He stated that the question for the City Council is who is group that narrows the field of the candidates.

Councillor Mazen stated his desire to be part of this group. He asked if the City Council could have Executive Sessions with three groups of three City Councillors in attendance without being in violation of the Open Meeting Law. City Solicitor Glowa stated that there is guidance from the Attorney General with respect to screening candidates and hiring processes. She would research this further.

Councillor Devereux stated that the evaluation committee would help review the pool of applicants to no more than four. Councillor Mazen asked if the evaluation committee could include the entire membership of the City Council as long as they did not meet simultaneously. Councillor Devereux stated that the finalist should be asked to do a case study to demonstrate how they problem solve on their feet and how they communicate.

Vice Mayor McGovern spoke about the process and doing focus groups at different times and locations around the city. He wanted the process open and inviting and including people not usually included in city government. He spoke about a dramatic change in direction for the City and that Cambridge does not need a dramatic overhaul. He wanted a wide variety of opinions in this process. He stated that to be a City Manager you must be willing to be unpopular. He wanted the City Council to be cautious and choose the best person to manage the city.

Councillor Maher stated that there needs to be a key staff person that helps between the City Council and the search firm who knows hiring laws and procedures. He stated that he would like the Personnel Director to assume this role. Ms. Keady Rawson stated that this is an exciting project for her to work on and she looks forward to the process. She added that this will require additional staff.

Councillor Maher stated that it is important to balance the need for a transparent process with respecting the confidentiality of the candidate pool and complying with the Open Meeting Law. The City Solicitor will play a key role in managing this. He stated that the City Solicitor is working on a document for the next meeting.

Councillor Maher noted that the public must be consistently update. He has spoken to the Deputy City Manager and the IT Department. There will be information on the website relating to the process. Regular communication updates area needed. He wanted a designated IT person assigned to the process.

Councillor Toomey emphasized that it is important to ensure that multi-lingual agencies such as MAPS, CEOC, Latino and Haitian communities are included in the process although they did not attend meetings. He stated that reaching out to these communities is vital.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that it is important that update be consistent and be included on the City Council agenda which allow people to speak on the matter. He added that in the absence of information the public speculates on the process. Councillor Toomey noted that many people do watch the City Council meetings.

Councillor Mazen stated that he hopes that this will be an educational process. It is good that the City Council can continue the process in the spirit of openness and transparency. He stated that he is excited about a positive outcome and wants this to be a congenial process with a healthy difference of opinions.

Councillor Devereux suggested that the community engagement teams could be asked to announce the City Manager process when they are working on the envisioning process.

Councillor Maher scheduled the next meeting for Apr 6, 2016 at 10am. The City Solicitor will review the Open Meeting Law question about 3 groups of 3 City Councillors being in an Executive Session and how many members can be involved. At the next meeting the evaluation criteria will be discussed. Ms. Wits will look at the Superintendent process. Ms. Wits She stated that there is an advertising requirement. She further explained that the City Manager will make the decision about when the contact at highest rated is the lowest bidder. She encouraged all to forward any suggestions for firms to her attention.

Councillor Maher stated that a draft timeline would be discussed at the next meeting.

Councillor Kelley asked who is expected to hire city staff who are retiring. He asked if Mr. Rossi would be expected to hire the police commissioner and library director. Councillor Toomey responded that Mr. Rossi is the City Manager under June 30, 2016 and it is up to him to make decision. He added that he wanted Mr. Rossi to make these decisions; he wanted stability in the City. Councillor Maher noted that the role does lie with the City Manager under his contract expires. Deputy City Manager Peterson informed the committee that the Library Director position has been advertised and that this hire will be done by June. Councillor Kelley stated that there will be a length of time with an Interim City Manager.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that there was openness from Mr. Rossi to stay for a few extra months to help with the transition.

At 11:22am Councillor Maher opened the hearing to public comment.

Lee Farris, 269 Norfolk Street, stated that this has been an interesting meeting. She stated that relating to the position of Interim, she has heard a rumor that there is a potential interim so she thinks that conversation needs to be held in public. She would like Mr. Rossi to stay until he could overlap with the incoming City Manager. Another consideration is what other key city position may turn over before Mr. Rossi leaves or after he leaves. It would be important to know because it would change the criteria when looking for a new City Manager. She stated that when talking about the search firm, a request is that you make sure they have credentials for successfully recruiting minorities and women of color. It is important for the candidate to have experience in multi-cultural communities. She stated that criteria in a search firm is hiring a comparable level employee. She stated that the Interim City Manager question is part of the desire to have a shorter time process. She stated that the committee could meet weekly instead of biweekly with the matter on the agenda every week and that the City Council could add more meetings in the summer.

Hasson Rashid, 820 Mass. Ave., stated that in the last process to hire a City Manager there was a lot of speculation on conducting an equitable search for City Manager. He stated that what happened was that the current City Manager was appointed without a fair hiring process. He stated that there was talk about community participation but none of that happened. He stated that it is a violation of Equal Employment Rights and denial of equal opportunities for blacks, women and other minorities. He asked what guarantees that the same thing will not happen again.

Robert Winters, 366 Broadway, stated that regarding the search firm, he trusts the wisdom of the Purchasing Agent and the City Council. He stated that during the previous process there were many suggestions made when Mr. Healy was retiring. It was not just about hiring a City Manager it was how we envision the city moving forward. He stated that the process got bloated and it was almost impossible to hire a City Manager. This is about hiring a City Manager and not re-envisioning all things in the city. He stated that there is a role for recruitment in many ways. He stated that this process need not and should not take too long. He stated that the City Council may want to give some indication of what the term of contract will be. If you want best candidates, you want to give them some indication of the term of the contract. He stated that ultimately it takes five votes to hire a City Manager.

Michael Brandon, 27 Seven Pines Avenue, stated that this is the most important task of the City Council. He suggested considering moving this out of the Government Operations Committee and ask the Mayor to appoint this as a Committee of the Whole. This would give all nine City Councillors the ability to weigh in. He stated that relating to keeping the public informed, he stated that with all the latest documentation and information and availability for input from the public directly, he suggested that arrangements be made for all of the meetings to be televised, live streamed and archived. Regarding the process, he stated that he hopes that what has happened in the past regarding the process will not happen again. He stated that if someone is on the inside track, do not spend the money on the process and do it up front. If you leave the public to believe that it is going to be an open process, figure out the timing. He stated that the current City Manager’s contract expires in June. He has expressed that he would stay on as an advisor. He asked what the thoughts are as it relates to an Interim City Manager. He stated that some sort of an internal advertisement could be made for an Interim City Manager which might give the City Council insight into who would be interested which could ease the process later on. He stated that the City Council has been lazy with keeping up with what its goals are.

Peter Valentine, 37 Brookline Street, stated that a person who has worked in a complex situation and a person who has achieved success are two important elements in a future City Manager.

Public comment closed at 11:45am.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that he has not heard rumors about an interim city manager. This is the reason the public needs to be updated. He asked for restraint about rumors.

Councillor Devereux questioned if it is required that an interim be named or can the Deputy City Manager fill the position.

Councillor Maher thanked all present for their attendance.

The hearing was adjourned at 11:48am on motion of Councillor Mazen.

For the Committee,
Councillor David P. Maher, Chair,

Proposed agenda for Mar 23rd meeting of the Government Operations and Rules Committee Meeting

1). Hiring a professional search firm?

Request for Proposal (RFP) vs. Pre-approved state vendor i.e. Collins Center at UMass

Role of the Council in selecting firm- evaluation of search firms

ICMA

2). Developing criteria for a scope of services~ what we want. (Amy Witts, Purchasing Agent)

Specify goal for length of process- i.e. 6 month process with offer made in September

Specify opportunities for public Input

<~~> Focus Groups

<~~> Council to hold public interviews for the finalists opportunity for the public to submit feedback forms

<~~> Town Hall meetings for final 3 candidates with questions from audience and opportunity to submit feedback forms

Focus groups and other meetings will aid in the development of the Leadership profile which will be used as a position announcement and tool in recruitment

Exhaustive recruitment efforts to find qualified applicants

How the Initial screening of applicant pool will be done- Search Firm, Appointed Committee, up to 4 Councillors

Presentation/recommendation of those to be offered confidential interviews

Narrowing of applicant pool to finalists- at this point names of finalists become public

Public interviews for finalists are held- these interviews would be open to the public and could be televised. Feedback forms would be available for the public to weigh in.

Town Hall Meetings

Council selects (by voting at a public meeting) a new Manager

3). Role of Sheila Keady Rawson, Director of Human Resources in the search- need for other staff

4) Balancing the need for a transparent process with respecting the confidentiality of the candidate pool and compliance with the requirements of the open meeting law. (Nancy Glowa, City Solicitor)

5). Keeping the public informed throughout the process

" IT

"' Webpage

" Regular updates and Communications

6). Next steps- next meeting Apr 6th

Committee Report #4
The Human Services and Veterans Committee held a public hearing on Tues, Mar 22, 2016 beginning at 1:07pm in the Sullivan Chamber.

The purpose of the hearing was to screen the documentary Under the Bridge: the Criminalization of Homelessness followed by a discussion of topics raised by the documentary directly following.

Present at the hearing were Vice Mayor McGovern, Chair; Councillor Toomey; Councillor Jan Devereux; Ellen Semonoff, Assistant City Manager for Human Services; Mike Payack; Michelle McCarthy, Human Services and Planning Development, Human Services Department; Joseph L. Wilson, Deputy Superintendent; Steven DeMarco, Deputy Superintendent; Sergeant Fred Cabral; Catherine Pemberton, LICSW, Cambridge Police Department; Claude Jacob, Chief Public Health Officer, Cambridge Public Health Department; Neil MacInnes-Barker, Director; Jeremy Halsdorff, Manager of Benefits and Services, Veterans’ Services Department; Brian Corr, Executive Director, Peace Commission; Kathleen Kelly, School Committee Member; Annie Nagle; Christian Schlachte; and Deputy City Clerk Paula M. Crane.

Also present were John MacGibbon, Editor/Filmmaker of Under the Bridge; Joseph Caparco; Jo Solet; Autumn Bennett; Marilyn Wellons; Michael Thistle; Siham Elazri; Delia Puntonio; Jayms Battaglia; Ginger Ryan; Kristine Jelstrup; Eva Martin Blythe; Ellen Schachter; and Schuyler Engel.

Vice Mayor McGovern convened the hearing and stated that homelessness is an issue which despite efforts, in some ways, it is not getting better. He stated that we must look at short-term goals as well as long-term goals in the thinking of moving people from homelessness to housing. He introduced John MacGibbon, Editor/Filmmaker of Under the Bridge.

Mr. MacGibbon stated that this film is a window into a summer in Indianapolis and the way this city chose to deal with the large homeless population. He looked forward the conversation following the viewing.

The attendees then viewed the documentary Under the Bridge.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that he regularly speaks to the homeless in Central Square and noted that some have gotten used to being homeless and would rather stay homeless because it is familiar to them. He stated that as a city we need to be more compassionate when it comes to the homeless community. He stated that the cleaning up of Central Square means different things to different people; some feel that it needs to be cleaned up esthetically while others feel that we need to rid Central Square of the homeless population. He stated that Cambridge had in place a Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness and currently a new process in underway.

Joe Solet, 15 Berkley Street, asked about others who have seen the documentary and questioned the reactions of the viewers. Mr. MacGibbon stated that the first place where the movie was previewed was in Washington, D.C. He stated that the people who are involved with the issue of homelessness are excited about the film. He added that the documentary has been signed by Circus Row Pictures.

Christine Jelstrup, 120 Pleasant Street, stated that she is working on the possibility of having the film presented at the State House. She stated that several members of Mothers Out Front are also trying to plan an inter-faith screening. She noted the importance of keeping the conversation of homelessness alive and continuing.

Marilyn Wellons asked if the film was shown in Indiana. Mr. McGibbon responded that the students who worked on the film finished it on their own and had lot of local screenings which generated life into the issue of homelessness in the City of Indianapolis. He noted that Indianapolis was the first state to pass a Bill of Rights as a result of this documentary. He stated that while things have improved in Indiana to some extent, there is still a long way to go.

Schuyler Engel, 21 Lawrence Street, questioned the ability of private institutions and government working together. She noted that there is a huge amount of private money in Cambridge. Vice Mayor McGovern responded that he is not sure that money is the biggest obstacle. He noted that space is a problem as there is a housing crisis across the board in Cambridge. He stated that Cambridge does not have space to build the things that need to be built which is part of the reason that he wants to keep the conversation about homeless going. He stated that when the City does have the opportunity to build, the need is great and the homeless sometimes falls to the bottom of the list. He stated that the issue of homelessness needs to be moved up on the priority list.

Ellen Semonoff stated that one of the things about the documentary that is important is that it is about people. She noted that it makes a difference when talking about individuals as opposed to an abstract group. She stated that choices are made by voters, city administration and the City Council on a variety of topics that affect the city, including homelessness.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that this is the reason the City Council is pushing for available locations for housing such as Vail Court. He explained that City does not know that a property is coming up for sale before someone swoops in and pays four times the asking amount. He said that the owners of Vail Court do not want to sell the property to the City. He said that the City has been told that the owners want to develop the parcel while adding that the City cannot force the owner to build transitional housing. He stated that the City of Cambridge strives to obtain as much affordable housing as possible in building projects and added that recently, the City Council fought for increased affordable units from Boston Properties in the Kendall Square Area. This resulted in a 10% increase in the amount of affordable units that were required.

Vice Mayor McGovern reiterated that a major obstacle is space. He added that in most other parts of the country, Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea would be part of Boston. He stated that that is not the case here. He stated that while some local non-profits speak to neighboring communities, it does not happen between the policymakers. He stated that none of the surrounding cities ask how to solve the problem together and added that he is working on remedying this situation. He stated that he is in the process of forming a coalition of neighboring cities and towns which will meet several times per year to work in collaboration on issues of importance.

Ellen Schachter questioned if the City is getting the most out of every project or property.

Councillor Devereux stated that she watched the documentary at her home. She said that it is very disturbing. She stated that she attended an event hosted by the Cambridge Historical Society with a discussion about homelessness and strategies. She told of “poor houses” and noted that the last one closed not long ago and was located in the area of the Neville Manor. She stated that the government is the people. She stated that it must be a collaboration that will include difficult conversations such as taxes. She said that Vice Mayor McGovern was correct when he stated that homelessness is a regional problem which needs a regional approach.

Councillor McGovern stated that certain parts of the City have consistently fought against affordable housing. He stated that he expects that this will be the same fight when discussing transitional housing. He said that it is gut-check time for the community to step up. He explained that he and his family live across the street from the needle exchange program and his children walk past people daily who use needles for heroine. He stated that this is a value that he has to help these people. He stated that it amazes him how quickly a person’s attitude can change when it becomes their family that will have to give something up to make something else happen in a positive way.

Joseph Caparco, 411 Franklin Street, stated the need to think out of the box. He suggested that area churches may have extra land available. He asked if the city has explored this possibility.

Jayms Battaglia, University Lutheran Church, Harvard Square, stated that one of the biggest issues as it relates to churches helping the homeless is that it is a huge responsibility. She stated that they opened up the church basement for food but it was not set up for overnight stays. She said that they brought in showers and cots but they then needed staff. She stated that this model is a student run shelter which runs from November through April. She said that many churches do not want the burden and what goes along with what people perceive to be the complications. She stated that there have been complications at the University Lutheran Church but added that the church community is invested in this ministry. She stated that they worked with Ms. Jillson and the Harvard Square Business Association to allow businesses to be part of the conversation when bringing the shelter to the center of Harvard Square. She said that there were a variety of questions including the safety of visitors, students, businesses, and how the shelter would work. She added that church parishioners wanted to be safe as well. She stated that the student body and the Co-Directors worked with Ms. Jillson and the community to answer questions and break down the myths of homelessness. She stated that the reality of homelessness is completely different than what people perceive. She stated that it is inhumane to be homeless and hungry and as a faith leader she is committed to the cause.

Michael Thistle, 151 Mass. Ave., stated that he is an example of homelessness. He stated that everyone thinks homelessness is based on drugs, alcohol, etc. He explained that he became homeless because he developed cancer and he could not afford his rent. He stated that he has a Master’s Degree and teaching certificate and has played professional basketball as well. He stated that cancer made it impossible for him to do his job which was helping drug and alcohol-addicted people. He stated the need for services. He stated that homelessness comes about in many ways. He applauded the work of the Multi-Service Center. He stated that all-inclusive service buildings would be beneficial.

Vice Mayor McGovern stated that the City has great partnerships. He noted that he has worked in Cambridge with homeless people for twenty years. He said that showing this documentary to the attendees present was similar to preaching to the choir as all of the attendees are advocates for the homeless. He stated that he would love to have a screening of the documentary for the general public. He stated that this group of people have been dehumanized. He stated that the issue of homelessness is about space but it is also about money. He stated that MIT is great to have in the city but there is space and power that buys that space. He said that if a city such as New York or Los Angeles can find a way to build a building with services, than the City of Cambridge should be able to do so as well.

Kathy Pemberton, LICSW, Cambridge Police Department, stated that she considers herself a credit to people with substance abuse and mental illness. She stated that her role was to find facilities for people to access care. She stated that access to care must be reasonable. She stated that she was hired by Cambridge Police Department and she has learned a great deal over the last year about law enforcement and mental health issues. She stated that there is a lot of trauma that comes before the Cambridge Police Department. She said that the institutional leadership and commitment is amazing. She stated that while it does not happen all over the country, much work does take place in Cambridge. She stated that stakeholders meetings occur with representatives from communities such as mental health, legal, disability, shelter services, etc. She stated that these meetings improve relationships to improve outcomes and it is gaining momentum.

Neil MacInnes-Barker stated that he has worked since 2013 with homeless youth. He thanked the City Council for providing the venue for this conversation. He said that it is valuable to show the film to get people’s brain working on such topics. He stated that the shame and misconception that comes with homelessness is sad. He stated that his own brother was homeless with his niece. He stated that this is a personal subject for him. He stated that the organizations in the City work in great collaboration and with a “boots on the ground” mentality. He said that grass root discussions are also very important to understand the gaps, misconceptions, and other issues. He stated that we don’t pay attention to the homeless and the lives of these individuals who are treated as trash. He applauded the committee for having this discussion.

Marilyn Wellons stated that walking among trees subdues part of the brain for morbid rumination. She stated that passive open space is helpful to her and she pointed out that open space is where people in the film were. She stated that we must re-think open space and be concerned about gentrification.

Ellen Semonoff stated that given how challenging this is, it is hard to imagine how we would manage as well without the level of collaboration that we have. She stated that she and Sergeant Cabral communicate on a regular basis. She said that it is not magic that the Police team is responding to provide support to someone. She noted that there is an amazing amount of services that take place because of collaboration among many departments. We must hold on to that. She stated that later this spring the committee that worked on the charrette will come back with recommendations. She stated that we must ensure that people do not become homeless. She said that the City of Cambridge has decided to hold on to a family homeless shelter and the commitment is strong to bring this shelter back to its own housing once again. She stated the need for permanent supported housing and stated that the emphasis whereby people get priority for housing is something that the City Council will continue to look at.

Councillor McGovern stated that education must come in terms of educating others as it relates to homeless and help people understand that homelessness can happen to anyone. He said that it is incumbent on us to bring people into the conversation and to work together to spread word and build a stronger coalition.

Vice Mayor McGovern thanked all those present for their participation.

The hearing adjourned at 3:15pm.

For the Committee,
Vice Mayor Marc C. McGovern, Chair