11. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-14, requesting an update on the Lechmere Station closure, the replacement bus service, and the community outreach that is planned.
Placed on File

Feb 24, 2020
To the Honorable, the City Council:

In response to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-14, requesting an update on the Lechmere Station closure, the replacement bus service, and the community outreach that is planned, Director of Traffic, Parking, and Transportation Joseph Barr, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Iram Farooq, and Commissioner of Public Works Owen O’Riordan report the following.

Background
The City has been involved in the planning, design, and implementation of the Green Line Extension (GLX) for many years, including the current version of the project that is under construction and is expected to be complete by the end of 2021. General information about the GLX project is available through the project website: <https://www.mass.gov/green-lineextension-project-glx>.

Currently, the City is involved in a number of coordination efforts with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and the GLX project team, including monthly Community Working Group meetings, ongoing design reviews and construction permitting, and informal staff discussions. In addition, the City has agreed to make a $25 million contribution to the state, divided into $5 million annual payments, to help pay for the costs of the project, which is then allocated to construction in Cambridge. To date, the City has paid the first two installments, totaling $10 million, and the state has begun to use these funds for the construction of the structures for the new Lechmere Station.

Lechmere Station Shutdown
Construction of the GLX is well underway in Cambridge in the area near Lechmere Station and Cambridge Crossing. As part of the project, the new Lechmere Station is being constructed on the north side of Monsignor O’Brien Highway, which will then allow for service to be extended north and west to Somerville and Medford. At the same time, the GLX project will replace the existing steel viaduct that carries Green Line trains to today’s Lechmere Station. Cumulatively, this construction requires that the Green Line temporarily end train service at North Station. The Science Park/West End Station will be closed during this time, and the new Lechmere Station will be constructed. This temporary closure is for an 11-month period beginning in May 2020.

During the closure, the following construction activities will occur:

• Removal of the existing viaduct crossing Monsignor O’Brien Highway into the current Lechmere Station, requiring a full closure of the road. MassDOT and the GLX project team are currently discussing a series of weekend closures to complete this work, including five weekend closures for demolition (Friday evening to Monday morning, 24 hours per day).

• Replacement of the steel viaduct that carries the Green Line between the Gilmore Bridge and Lechmere Station. Similarly, several full weekend closures of Monsignor O’Brien Highway (also Friday evening to Monday morning, 24 hours per day) are being planned in July/August for pier cap construction and in August/September for structural steel placement.

• Construction of the new Lechmere Station.

• Rehabilitation work on the concrete viaduct that carries the Green Line in front of the Museum of Science (note that this is a separate project being completed simultaneously by the MBTA Capital Delivery group).

• Testing of the new tracks, signals, and other systems that support the operation of Green Line service.

• The demolition of the existing Lechmere Station is not included in the GLX Project contract. When the new Lechmere Station is open to the public, the old station and the property it sits on will be transferred from the MBTA to DivcoWest. At that point, DivcoWest will demolish the old station and yard and build the remaining roadway improvements on North First Street and O’Brien Highway.

The opening of the new Lechmere Station, expected by May 2021, will also mark the opening of the first of two branches of the Green Line Extension. This first branch will include service to Union Square Station in Somerville.

Replacement Bus Service
During this one-year shutdown, the MBTA will operate a “bus bridge” service replacing the Green Line between Lechmere Station and North Station. This bus bridge will begin at the existing Lechmere Station Cambridge Street bus loop, travel via a short section of Cambridge Street, O’Brien Highway and Charles River Dam Road towards Boston with a stop along the way near the Museum of Science, then let passengers off near the rear entrance to North Station on Nashua Street. There are several points worth highlighting about this replacement bus service:

• Because O’Brien Highway and Charles River Dam Road both experience significant traffic congestion during the rush hours, and intermittently at other times, the MBTA is proposing to install bus lanes on these roads for the duration of the bus bridge to provide these buses with priority travel across the bridge. The MBTA and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation are currently completing an analysis of the traffic impacts of these bus lanes, including the potential benefits for bus passengers and the negative impacts that would be associated with not providing buses with priority travel across the bridge. The City will be closely following the results of this analysis to understand the most beneficial approach that will most efficiently move people traveling in this corridor.

• The buses that currently travel to Lechmere Station from Cambridge and Somerville (routes 69, 80, 87, and 88) will continue to terminate at Lechmere Station and will not run through to North Station. Passengers connecting to the Green Line will need to transfer to the replacement bus service to travel to North Station. While a number of groups have suggested that these bus routes should continue to a North Station terminal during the Green Line closure, the MBTA has ultimately decided that this option is not feasible.

• The separated bicycle lanes that were recently installed on Charles River Dam Road will remain in place, which will allow travelers to use cycling, including the use of Bluebikes, as an alternative transit option.

• The location of the North Station stop of the replacement bus service includes a 1,500-foot walk to connect with the Green Line and Orange Line platforms. This walk should take 5 to 7 minutes at average walking speed. The MBTA and GLX team plan to direct connecting passengers to walk through covered and underground walkways and interior passageways of the commuter rail station. These walkways and passageways are currently accessible to people with disabilities.

• During the second half of the Green Line shutdown, the GLX team will conduct operational and safety tests of the new viaduct and associated systems. These tests may take up to six months. As a result, constituents will begin to see Green Line trains on the viaduct and extension even though the opening of the new Lechmere Station and the Union Square Branch will not take place for several months.

Community Outreach
To share information with the Cambridge community prior to this shutdown occurring, the GLX project team is holding a project-wide public meeting at the Multicultural Arts Center (41 Second Street) in East Cambridge, on Tues, Mar 10, 2020 from 6:00pm-7:30pm. In addition, in the near future they will be implementing a public communications strategy to alert the traveling public to this year long closure and allow public transportation users to consider if/how they may need to adjust their time, location, and mode of travel.

Very truly yours, Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager

12. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to a Planning Board recommendation to adopt the Incentive Zoning Contribution Rate Zoning Petition.
Placed on File

Date: February 18, 2020
Subject: Incentive Zoning Contribution Rate Zoning Petition
Recommendation: The Planning Board recommends ADOPTION.

To the Honorable, the City Council,

On February 11, 2020, the Planning Board (the "Board") held a public hearing on a City Council zoning petition (the "Petition") to amend Article 11.000 of the Zoning Ordinance to increase the Housing Contribution Rate for "Incentive Projects" as defined in Article 2.000. The Petition would amend Section 11.202(b) to increase the Housing Contribution Rate from $17.10 per square foot to $19.10 per square foot. At the public hearing, the Board received a presentation and testimony from the Community Development Department ("CDD") staff and Karl F. Seidman, the author of the December 2019 Cambridge Incentive Zoning Ordinance Nexus Study Final Report (the ''Study"), and heard testimony from members of the public.

Following discussion of the Study and the Petition, the Board voted to strongly recommend that the City Council adopt the Petition. The Board enthusiastically supports the City's efforts to increase funding for affordable housing production in the City. Further, Board members agreed that the contribution rate should be substantially larger and encouraged the City Council to consider further increases. Board members raised questions about the various assumptions that provided the basis for the Study's recommendations and urged consideration of other issues, such as displacement of residents in existing housing and the effects of commercial demand on new housing production in Cambridge. Board members also urged consideration of how substantially raising the fee could discourage development, cause increases in commercial rents, or otherwise affect Cambridge's overall economic balance and competitiveness in a regional market.

Respectfully submitted for the Planning Board,
Catherine Preston Connolly, Chair.

2. A communication was received from Councillor McGovern, transmitting a memorandum with comments on refilling the 100% Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning Petition 2020.
Placed on File

TO: Cambridge City Council
FROM: Councillor Marc McGovern
DATE: Feb 20, 2019
RE: Comments on Refiling the 100% Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning Petition 2020

Fellow Councillors:

In the months since the Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning Petition (AHO) was tabled, having secured favorable recommendations out of the Ordinance Committee and Planning Board, Cambridge’s housing crisis has not subsided. If anything, the acuteness of the region’s housing shortage has only become more focused. A new report out of the Metropolitan Planning Area Council confirmed the particular challenges that blue-collar families with children <https://metrocommon.mapc.org/reports/10> face in securing affordable housing. The Boston Globe finally endorsed <https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/02/18/opinion/letting-towns-solve-mass-housing-shortage/> Governor Baker’s Housing Choices Bill, lamenting the “Commonwealth’s bizarre housing laws…that empowers small minorities to thwart just the kind of housing projects that the state so desperately needs.” (The same bizarre law, as it happens, that thwarted the AHO last year and doomed it to sit on the table with a majority of Councillors in support of passage.)

The refiled AHO petition takes the language recommended out of the Ordinance Committee as its base text. This version was the result of an extensive and lengthy public process. All told, the AHO was discussed at more than a dozen community meetings, nine Housing Committee meetings over two years, and four Ordinance Committee hearings logging more than 21 hours of public comment and debate (not to mention full City Council meetings). Councillors voted on some 62 amendments in Ordinance Committee, the vast majority (46 amendments) of which were adopted. Nearly all of the successful amendments (41) were offered by Councillors who ultimately voted against the AHO.

As the Community Development Department cautioned in a memo to the Council last year, however, “to the extent that these [additional] requirements add cost to, or complicate the development of, AHO projects, and particularly if these requirements are not similarly imposed on market-rate developments, the potential impact of the AHO may be lessened.” Accordingly, the petitioners have offered some amendments in consultation with Cambridge’s affordable housing developers to better enable the AHO to create housing more quickly, predictably, and efficiently, as was originally intended. The amendments from AHO 2019 are summarized as follows:

• Amendments in section 11.207.3 Standards for Eligibility, Rent, and Initial Sale Price for AHO Units are included so as not to conflict with state funding requirements, and to clarify that certain regulations are project specific.

• It is reasonable to assume that existing building might be relocated on the parcel as well as “altered, reconstructed, extended, or enlarged” in order to more suitable meeting the intent and guidelines of this overlay. This is now reflected in 11.207.5.3 Standards for Existing Buildings to permit the type of historical preservation achieved, for example, in the Frost Terrace project.

• In section 11.207.5.2 Dimensional Standards for AHO, effort has been made to avoid confusions where a zoning district intersects property lines by measuring buffer zones from an abutting parcel line that is in a lower-density district, rather than a district line which may split a parcel otherwise suitable for affordable housing.

• An amendment to section 11.207.5.2.3 establishes a minimum front yard setback of 15 feet, greater than the 10 feet observed by the Cambridge Urban Forest Master Plan to produce the City’s densest canopy, except where the existing base zoning is less restrictive, or where such a setback would not fit the context of abutting properties.

• An amendment to section 107.5.2.4 Open Space restores a test for setting required open space percentages originally recommended to the Council and ensures affordable housing developers have flexibility in meeting the Council’s open space goals.

• Current language in section 11.207.6.1 Required Off-Street Accessory Parking would require expansive, likely non-permeable off-street facilities to accommodate passenger pick-up/drop off and delivery trucks regardless of the project size. A revision to this section would avoid eating into open space for the purpose of off-street vehicle facilities on projects with fewer than 20 units.

• Responding to feedback from our affordable housing partners that portions of section 11.207.7.2 Site Design and Arrangement requirements would render a project unworkable and might not achieve the desired streetscape design, dimensional standards have been relaxed in breaking up building massing while still preserving the Council goal of preventing unbroken facades of more than 150 feet. Some additional clarifying amendments are included.

• Window sizes for non-residential portions of buildings are set at 30 percent in Section 11.207.7.3 Building Facades and Section 11.207.7.4 Ground Stories and Stories Below Grade, which should translate to less energy loss than the previously proposed 70 percent glazing. Further, the mandate that affordable housing developers subsidize the building of retail space is lifted, allowing nonresidential uses to be created where site appropriate.

• Section 11.207.7.6 Environmental Design Standards creates something of a double negative in the municipal code with regard to the applicability of the Tree Protection Ordinance to AHO projects - tree regulations do not apply to affordable housing projects exempted from the Tree Protection Ordinance. The release of the Urban Tree Canopy Master Plan and expected overhaul of the Tree Protection Ordinance will provide an opportunity to apply a single standard to all affordable housing projects, and thus this contorted language may be stricken altogether.

Sincerely, Marc McGovern

3. A communication was received from Councillor Dennis Carlone, transmitting Proposed Amendments to the Harvard Square Overlay District Zoning Petition.
Placed on File and Referred to Committee Report #1

Feb 24, 2020

The following portions of the Harvard Square Overlay District Zoning Petition contain proposed amendments by the Ordinance Committee Co-Chair for existing Sections 20.4.2 Building Height Limitations, 20.54.5 Building Setbacks, and 20.54.7 Additional FAR to enhance the petition goals. All proposed amendments are highlighted in red, italicized text.

20.50 Harvard Square Overlay District and Harvard Square Historic Overlay District

20.54.2 Building Height Limitations. The maximum height of buildings in the Harvard Square Overlay District shall be governed by the requirements of this Section 20.54.2; however, at locations where the base zoning district establishes a more restrictive height limitation, the more restrictive shall apply.

1. As of Right Height Limitations. The maximum height of any building shall be sixty (60) feet.

2. Special Permit for Additional Height. The maximum allowable height in the Harvard Square Overlay District may be increased up to eighty (80) feet upon issuance of a Special Permit by the Planning Board. If a Special Permit is issued portions of the building may extend to eighty (80) feet in height provided that those portions in excess of sixty (60) feet are set back from the street line at least ten (10) feet, and that those portions are also set back from one or more forty-five (45) degree sky exposure planes, unless otherwise permitted by the Planning Board. A forty-five (45) degree sky exposure plane shall be an imaginary inclined plane beginning fifty-five (55) feet above any street-line in the districts and rising over one or more lots at a forty-five (45 ) degree angle.”

Allowed Special Permit exceptions to upper floor setbacks must successfully reduce the overall negative effect of multiple floor setbacks and enhance both the proposed building silhouette and townscape of the block. Such architectural elements as pergolas, and occupiable corner pavilions, raised pediment above the main building entry, and special features that animate the public domain experience. All such exceptions are to be limited in scope.

All approved facade setbacks are to provide accessible, useable balconies for tenants.

20.54.5 Building Setbacks. Maintenance of the Harvard Square Overlay District's positive diversity of building form and scale and its variety of open spaces, yards and courtyards is encouraged throughout the District. It is therefore desirable to permit design flexibility to allow any physical change in the District to reflect the character of the area within which it is located. To this end any building in the Harvard Square Overlay District shall be exempt from the yard requirements as specified in Section 5.30, (except as noted in number 3 below and where such yard abuts a lot, but not a public way, outside the Overlay District) if the following conditions are met:

1. The building existed as of December 15, 1985 or a building permit had been issued by that date, or

2. For any new building in any Business, Office or Residence C-3 base-zoning district, for which a building permit is issued after December 15, 1985, the Planning Board issues a Special Permit exempting the building from yard requirements provided:

a. The design of the new structure shall be in conformance with the objectives and criteria contained in Harvard Square Development Guidelines.

b. No National Register or contributing building is demolished or so altered as to terminate or preclude its designation as a National Register or contributing building; and

c. No National Register or contributing building previously existed on the site in the preceding five (5) years and which has been so altered as to terminate or preclude its designation or demolished prior to the application.

3. For any new building in a Business B district seeking a Special Permit a rear yard setback of twenty (20) feet shall be provided with upper floor ten (10) foot setbacks beginning at forty-five (45) feet above grade. The resulting yard shall create a landscaped open space.

20.54.7 Additional FAR. Upon the issuance of a special permit, the special permit granting authority (Planning Board) may increase the allowable FAR on any lot or portion of a lot in the Business B district located within the Harvard Square Overlay District for any residential use in section 4.31 (a-h) or any commercial use in section 4.34 or 4.35 provided the Planning Board finds that the use and design complies with the goals and design guidelines set forth in the Harvard Square Conservation District and provides additional public benefits commensurate with the additional development, such as the following:

1. Ground floors that are devoted to retail and similar uses that activate the square and serve the needs of the surrounding community and visitors;

2. Commitments to recruit and retain small, local, and independent businesses, in part through maintaining 50 percent of first floor public frontage as commercial rental space of approximately 1,500 sq. ft.in size;

3. Creation of mixed-income housing;

4. Commitments to sustainable design that minimize greenhouse gas emissions and increases vegetation, and;

5. Investments into creating or improving public space.

TEXT OF ORDERS
O-1     Feb 24, 2020
COUNCILLOR MCGOVERN
COUNCILLOR SIMMONS
COUNCILLOR SOBRINHO-WHEELER
COUNCILLOR TOOMEY
ORDERED: That the below proposed zoning ordinance establishing an Affordable Housing Overlay be submitted by the City Council, and that it be referred to the Committee on Ordinances and the Planning Board for public hearings, as provided in Chapter 40A, Section 5 of the Massachusetts General Laws, to wit:
ORDERED: That the Cambridge City Council amend Section 2.000, DEFINITIONS, of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cambridge amended to insert the following definitions alphabetically:

Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning Petition

Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO). A set of modified development standards set forth in Section 11.207.3 of this Zoning Ordinance intended to allow incremental increases in density, limited increases in height, and relaxation of certain other zoning limitations for residential developments in which all units are made permanently affordable to households earning up to 100% of area median income.

Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) Dwelling Unit. A dwelling unit within an AHO Project for which occupancy is restricted to an AHO Eligible Household and whose rent or initial sale price is established by the provisions of Section 11.207.3 of this Zoning Ordinance.

Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) Eligible Household. A household whose gross household income does not exceed the amounts set forth in Section 11.207.3 of this Zoning Ordinance.

Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) Project. The construction of a new building or buildings and/or the modification of an existing building or buildings resulting in single-family, two-family, townhouse, or multifamily dwellings within which each dwelling unit is an AHO Dwelling Unit subject to the standards and restrictions set forth in Section 11.207 of this Zoning Ordinance.

Grade. The mean finished ground elevation of a lot measured either around the entire perimeter of the building or along any existing wall facing a public street, which ground elevation is maintained naturally without any structural support.

Ground Story or Ground Floor. The lowest Story Above Grade within a building.

Story. That portion of a building included between the upper surface of a floor and the upper surface of the floor or roof next above.

Story Above Grade. A Story whose highest point is more than 4 feet above the Grade.

Story Below Grade. Any Story that is lower than the Ground Story of a building.

Inserting a new section 11.207, AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY, of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cambridge, to read as follows:

11.207.1 Purpose and Intent

The purpose of this Section is to promote the public good by supporting the development of housing that is affordable to households earning up to 100% of area median income. The intent of this Section is to allow incremental increases in density, limited increases in height, and relaxation of certain other zoning limitations for residential developments in which all units are made permanently affordable to households earning up to 100% of area median income (referred to as “AHO Projects,” as defined in Article 2.000 of this Zoning Ordinance); to incentivize the reuse of existing buildings in order to create AHO Projects that are more compatible with established neighborhood character; to promote the city’s urban design objectives in Section 19.30 of this Zoning Ordinance while enabling AHO Projects to be permitted as-of-right, subject to non-binding advisory design consultation procedures that follow all design objectives set forth within this Zoning Ordinance and the results of the design review process shall be provided to the Cambridge Affordable Housing Trust; and to apply such standards throughout the City, to promote city planning goals of achieving greater socioeconomic diversity and a more equitable distribution of affordable housing citywide.

11.207.2 Applicability

(a) The provisions set forth in this Section shall apply to AHO Projects, as defined in Article 2.000 of this Zoning Ordinance, in all zoning districts except Open Space Districts.

(b) An AHO Project shall be permitted as-of-right if it meets all of the standards set forth in this Affordable Housing Overlay in place of the requirements otherwise applicable in the zoning district. Any development not meeting all of the standards set forth in this Affordable Housing Overlay shall be subject to the requirements otherwise applicable in the zoning district, including any requirements for special permits.

11.207.3 Standards for Eligibility, Rent, and Initial Sale Price for AHO Dwelling Units

(a) All dwelling units in an AHO Project shall comply with the standards for AHO Dwelling Units as set forth in this Section.

(b) For all AHO Dwelling Units:

(i) AHO Dwelling Units shall be rented or sold only to AHO Eligible Households, with preference given to Cambridge residents, and former Cambridge residents who experienced a no-fault eviction in Cambridge in the last twelve (12) months, in accordance with standards and procedures related to selection, asset limits, and marketing established by the Community Development Department (CDD) and applicable state funding requirements.

(ii) AHO Dwelling Units shall be created and conveyed subject to recorded covenants approved by CDD guaranteeing the permanent availability of the AHO Dwelling Units for AHO Eligible Households.

(c) For rental AHO Dwelling Units:

(i) The gross household income of an AHO Eligible Household upon initial occupancy shall be no more than one-hundred percent (100%) of AMI.

(ii) At least eighty percent (80%) of AHO Dwelling Units within the project shall be occupied by AHO Eligible Households whose gross household income upon initial occupancy is no more than eighty percent (80%) of AMI.

(iii) Rent, including utilities and any other fees routinely charged to tenants and approved by CDD, shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the gross household income of the AHO Eligible Household occupying the AHO Dwelling Unit or other similar standard pursuant to an applicable housing subsidy program which has been approved by CDD.

(iv) After initial occupancy, the gross household income of an AHO Eligible Household shall be verified annually, or on such other basis required by an applicable housing subsidy program which has been approved by CDD, to determine continued eligibility and rent, in accordance with policies, standards, and procedures established by CDD.

(v) An AHO Eligible Household may continue to rent an AHO Dwelling Unit after initial occupancy even if the AHO Eligible Household’s gross household income exceeds the eligibility limits set forth above, but may not exceed one hundred twenty percent (120%) of AMI for more than one year after that Eligible Household’s gross household income has been verified to exceed such percentage, unless otherwise restricted pursuant to an applicable housing subsidy program which has been approved by CDD.

(vi) Notwithstanding the requirements set forth in (i) through (v) above, an owner may voluntarily choose to charge a lower rent than as provided herein for AHO Dwelling Units.

(d) For owner-occupied AHO Dwelling Units:

(i) The gross household income of an AHO Eligible Household upon initial occupancy shall be no more than one-hundred percent (100%) of AMI.

(ii) At least fifty percent (50%) of AHO Dwelling Units shall be sold to AHO Eligible Households whose gross household income upon initial occupancy is no more than eighty percent (80%) of AMI.

(iii) The initial sale price of an AHO Dwelling Unit shall be approved by CDD and shall be determined to ensure that the monthly housing payment (which shall include debt service at prevailing mortgage loan interest rates, utilities, condominium or related fees, insurance, real estate taxes, and parking fees, if any) shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the monthly income of:

1. A household earning ninety percent (90%) of AMI, in the case of an AHO Dwelling Unit to be sold to an AHO Eligible Household whose income upon initial occupancy is no more than one-hundred percent (100%) of AMI; or

2. A household earning seventy percent (70%) of AMI, in the case of an AHO Dwelling Unit to be sold to an AHO Eligible Household whose income upon initial occupancy is no more than eighty percent (80%) of AMI.

(e) An AHO Project meeting the standards set forth herein as approved by CDD shall not be required to comply with the Inclusionary Housing Requirements set forth in 11.203 of this Zoning Ordinance.

11.207.4 Use

(a) In all zoning districts, an AHO Project may contain single-family, two-family, townhouse, or multifamily dwellings as-of-right. Townhouse and Multifamily Special Permit procedures shall not apply.

(b) An AHO Project may contain active non-residential uses on the ground floor as they may be permitted as-of-right in the base zoning district or the overlay district(s) that are applicable to a lot, which for the purpose of this Section shall be limited to Institutional Uses listed in Section 4.33, Office Uses listed in Section 4.34 Paragraphs a. through e., and Retail and Consumer Service uses listed in Section 4.35 that provide services to the general public.

11.207.5 Development Standards

11.207.5.1 General Provisions

(a) For the purposes of this Section, the phrase “District Development Standards” shall refer to the development standards of the base zoning district as they may be modified by the development standards of all overlay districts (with the exception of this Affordable Housing Overlay) that are applicable to a lot.

(b) District Dimensional Standards shall include the most permissive standards allowable on a lot, whether such standards are permitted as-of-right or allowable by special permit. A District Dimensional Standard that is allowable by special permit shall include any nondiscretionary requirements or limitations that would otherwise apply.

(c) An AHO Project that conforms to the following development standards shall not be subject to other limitations that may be set forth in Article 5.000 or other Sections of this Zoning Ordinance, except as otherwise stated in this Section.

11.207.5.2 Dimensional Standards for AHO Projects

11.207.5.2.1 Building Height and Stories Above Grade. For an AHO Project, the standards set forth below shall apply in place of any building height limitations set forth in the District Development Standards.

(a) Where the District Dimensional Standards set forth a maximum residential building height of forty (40) feet or less, an AHO Project shall contain no more than four (4) Stories Above Grade and shall have a maximum height of forty-five (45) feet, as measured from existing Grade. For AHO Projects containing active non-residential uses on the ground floor, the maximum height may be increased to fifty (50) feet but the number of Stories Above Grade shall not exceed four (4) stories.

(b) Where the District Dimensional Standards set forth a maximum residential building height of more than forty (40) feet but not more than fifty (50) feet, an AHO Project shall contain no more than six (6) Stories Above Grade and shall have a maximum height of sixty-five (65) feet, as measured from existing Grade, except as further limited below. For AHO Projects containing active non-residential uses on the ground floor, the maximum height may be increased to seventy (70) feet but the number of Stories Above Grade shall not exceed six (6) stories.

(i) Except where the AHO Project abuts a non-residential use, portions of an AHO Project that are within thirty-five (35) feet of a district whose District Dimensional Standards allow a maximum residential building height of forty (40) feet or less shall be limited by the provisions of Paragraph (a) above, except that if the AHO project parcel extends into that District, then the height limitation shall only extend thirty five (35) feet from the property line.

(c) Where the District Dimensional Standards set forth a maximum residential building height of more than fifty (50) feet, an AHO Project shall contain no more than seven (7) Stories Above Grade and shall have a maximum height of eighty (80) feet, as measured from existing Grade, except as further limited below.

(i) Except where the AHO Project abuts a non-residential use, portions of an AHO Project that are within thirty-five (35) feet of a district whose District Dimensional Standards allow a maximum residential building height of forty (40) feet or less shall be reduced to a minimum of five (5) Stories Above Grade or a maximum height of sixty (60) feet, as measured from existing Grade, except that if the AHO project parcel extends into that District, then the height limitation shall only extend thirty five (35) feet from the property line.

(d) The Height Exceptions set forth in Section 5.23 of this Zoning Ordinance shall apply when determining the building height of an AHO Project.

11.207.5.2.2 Residential Density

(a) Where the District Dimensional Standards establish a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of less than 1.00, an AHO Project shall not exceed an FAR of 2.00. Otherwise, there shall be no maximum FAR for an AHO Project.

(b) There shall be no minimum lot area per dwelling unit for an AHO Project.

11.207.5.2.3 Yard Setbacks

(a) For the purpose of this Section, the applicable District Dimensional Standards shall not include yard setback requirements based on a formula calculation as provided in Section 5.24.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, but shall include non-derived minimum yard setback requirements set forth in Article 5.000 or other Sections of this Zoning Ordinance.

(b) Front Yards. An AHO Project shall have a minimum front yard setback of 15 feet, except where the District Dimensional Standards establish a less restrictive requirement or where the average of the front yard setbacks of the four (4) nearest pre-existing principal buildings that contain at least two Stories Above Grade and directly front the same side of the street as the AHO Project, or may be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet in the case of an AHO Project on a corner lot. Where the District Dimensional Standards set forth different requirements for residential and non-residential uses, the non-residential front yard setback requirement shall apply to the entire AHO Project if the Ground Story contains a non-residential use as set forth in Section 11.207.4 Paragraph (b) above; otherwise, the residential front yard setback shall apply.

(c) Side Yards. An AHO Project shall have a minimum side yard setback of seven and one-half (7.5) feet, or may be reduced to the minimum side yard setback set forth in the District Dimensional Standards for residential uses that is not derived by formula if it is less restrictive.

(d) Rear Yards. An AHO Project shall have a minimum rear yard setback of twenty (20) feet, or may be reduced to the minimum rear yard setback set forth in the District Dimensional Standards for residential uses that is not derived by formula if it is less restrictive.

(e) Projecting eaves, chimneys, bay windows, balconies, open fire escapes and like projections which do not project more than three and one-half (3.5) feet from the principal exterior wall plane, and unenclosed steps, unroofed porches and the like which do not project more than ten (10) feet beyond the line of the foundation wall and which are not over four (4) feet above Grade, may extend beyond the minimum yard setback.

(f) Bicycle parking spaces, whether short-term or long-term, and appurtenant structures such as coverings, sheds, or storage lockers may be located within a required yard setback but no closer than seven and one-half (7.5) feet to an existing principal residential structure on an abutting lot.

11.207.5.2.4 Open Space

(a) Except where the District Dimensional Standards establish a less restrictive requirement or as otherwise provided below, the minimum percentage of open space to lot area for an AHO Project shall be thirty percent (30%). However, the minimum percentage of open space to lot area may be reduced to no less than fifteen percent (15%) if the AHO Project includes the preservation and protection of an existing building included on the State Register of Historic Places.

(b) The required open space shall be considered Private Open Space but shall be subject to the limitations set forth below and shall not be subject to the dimensional and other limitations set forth in Section 5.22 of this Zoning Ordinance. Private Open Space shall exclude parking and driveways for automobiles.

(c) All of the required open space that is located at grade shall meet the definition of Permeable Open Space as set forth in this Zoning Ordinance.

(d) The required open space shall be located at Grade or on porches and decks that are no higher than the floor elevation of the lowest Story Above Grade, except that up to twenty five percent (25%) of the required open space may be located at higher levels, such as balconies and decks, only if it is accessible to all occupants of the building.

(e) For the purpose of this Affordable Housing Overlay, area used for covered or uncovered bicycle parking spaces that are not contained within a building shall be considered Private Open Space.

11.207.5.3 Standards for Existing Buildings

A building that is in existence as of the effective date of this Ordinance and does not conform to the standards set forth in Section 11.207.5.2 above may be altered, reconstructed, extended, relocated, and/or enlarged for use as an AHO Project as-of-right in accordance with the standards set forth below. Except as otherwise stated, the required dimensional characteristics of the building and site shall be those existing at the time of the conversion to an AHO Project if they do not conform to the standards of Section 11.207.5.2. The following modifications shall be permitted as-of-right, notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Article 8.000 of this Zoning Ordinance:

(a) Construction occurring entirely within an existing structure, including the addition of Gross Floor Area within the interior of the existing building envelope that may violate or further violate FAR limitations set forth in Section 11.207.5.2, and including any increase to the number of dwelling units within the existing building, provided that the resulting number of Stories Above Grade is not more than the greater of the existing number of Stories Above Grade or the existing height of the building divided by 10 feet.

(b) The relocation, enlargement, or addition of windows, doors, skylights, or similar openings to the exterior of a building.

(c) The addition of insulation to the exterior of an existing exterior wall to improve energy efficiency, provided that the resulting exterior plane of the wall shall either conform to the yard setback standards set forth in Section 11.207.5.2 above or shall not intrude more than eight (8) inches further into the existing yard setback and provided that the lot shall either conform to the open space standards set forth in Section 11.207.5.2 or shall not decrease the existing open space by more than 5% or 100 square feet, whichever is greater.

(d) The installation of exterior features necessary for the existing structure to be adapted to meet accessibility standards for persons with disabilities, including but not limited to walkways, ramps, lifts, or elevators, which may violate or further violate of the dimensional requirements set forth in Section 11.207.5.2.

(e) The repair, reconstruction, or replacement of any preexisting nonconforming portions of a building including but not limited to porches, decks, balconies, bay windows and building additions, provided that the repair, reconstruction or replacement does not exceed the original in footprint, volume, or area.

(f) Any other alterations, additions, extensions, or enlargements to the existing building that are not further in violation of the dimensional requirements set forth in Section 11.207.5.2 above.

11.207.6 Parking and Bicycle Parking

The limitations set forth in Article 6.000 of this Zoning Ordinance shall be modified as set forth below for an AHO Project.

11.207.6.1 Required Off-Street Accessory Parking

(a) There shall be no required minimum number of off-street parking spaces for an AHO Project except to the extent necessary to conform to other applicable laws, codes, or regulations.

(b) An AHO Project of greater than 20 units, for which no off-street parking is provided shall provide or have access to either on-street or off-street facilities that can accommodate passenger pick-up and drop-off by motor vehicles and short-term loading by moving vans or small delivery trucks. The Cambridge Traffic, Parking, and Transportation Department shall certify to the Superintendent of Buildings that the AHO Project is designed to reasonably accommodate such activity without causing significant hazard or congestion. The Cambridge Director of Traffic, Parking, and Transportation shall have the authority to promulgate regulations for the implementation of the provisions of this Paragraph.

11.207.6.2 Accessory Parking Provided Off-Site

(a) Off-street parking facilities may be shared by multiple AHO Projects, provided that the requirements of this Section are met by all AHO Dwelling Units served by the facility and the facility is within 1,000 feet of all AHO Projects that it serves.

(b) Off-street parking facilities for an AHO Project may be located within existing parking facilities located within 1,000 feet of the AHO Project and in a district where parking is permitted as a principal use or where the facility is a pre-existing nonconforming principal use parking facility, provided that the owner of the AHO Project shall provide evidence of fee ownership, a long-term lease agreement or renewable short-term lease agreement, recorded covenant, or comparable legal instrument to guarantee, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Superintendent of Buildings, that such facilities will be available to residents of the AHO Project.

11.207.6.3 Modifications to Design and Layout Standards for Off-Street Parking

(a) Notwithstanding Section 6.43.2, parking spaces may be arranged in tandem without requiring a special permit, provided that no more than two cars may be parked within any tandem parking space.

(b) Notwithstanding Section 6.43.6, owners of adjacent properties may establish common driveways under mutual easements without requiring a special permit.

(c) Notwithstanding Paragraph 6.44.1(a), on-grade open parking spaces may be located within ten (10) feet but not less than five (5) feet from the Ground Story of a building on the same lot or seven and one-half (7.5) feet from the Ground Story of a building on an adjacent lot without requiring a special permit, provided that such parking spaces are screened from buildings on abutting lots by a fence or other dense year-round visual screen.

(d) Notwithstanding Paragraph 6.44.1(b), on-grade open parking spaces and driveways may be located within five (5) feet of a side or rear property line without requiring a special permit, provided that screening is provided in the form of a fence or other dense year-round visual screen at the property line, unless such screening is waived by mutual written agreement of the owner of the lot and the owner of the abutting lot.

11.207.6.4 Modifications to Bicycle Parking Standards

(a) Notwithstanding Section 6.104, long-term or short-term bicycle parking spaces may be located anywhere on the lot for an AHO Project or on an adjacent lot in common ownership or under common control.

(b) Notwithstanding Section 6.107.5, up to 20 long-term bicycle parking spaces may be designed to meet the requirements for Short-Term Bicycle Parking Spaces, so long as they are covered from above to be protected from precipitation.

(c) The requirement for short-term bicycle parking shall be waived where only four of fewer short-term bicycle parking spaces would otherwise be required.

(d) The number of required bicycle parking spaces shall be reduced by half, up to a maximum reduction of 28 spaces, where a standard-size (19-dock) Public Bicycle Sharing Station is provided on the lot or by the developer of the AHO Project on a site within 500 feet of the lot, with the written approval of the City if located on a public street or other City property, or otherwise by legally enforceable mutual agreement with the owner of the land on which the station is located as approved by the Community Development Department. If additional Public Bicycle Sharing Station docks are provided, the number of required bicycle parking spaces may be further reduced at a rate of 0.5 bicycle parking space per additional Public Bicycle Sharing Station dock, up to a maximum reduction of half of the required number of spaces.

(e) For AHO Dwelling Units created within an existing building, bicycle parking spaces meeting the standards of this Zoning Ordinance shall not be required but are encouraged to be provided to the extent practical given the limitations of the existing structure. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided, as required by this Zoning Ordinance, for dwelling units in an AHO Project that are constructed fully outside the envelope of the existing structure.

11.207.6.5 Transportation Demand Management

An AHO Project not providing off-street parking at a ratio of 0.4 space per dwelling unit or more shall provide, in writing, to the Community Development Department a Transportation Demand Management program containing the following measures, at a minimum:

(a) Offering either a free annual membership in a Public Bicycle Sharing Service, at the highest available tier where applicable, or a 50% discounted MBTA combined subway and bus pass for six months or pass of equivalent value, to up to two individuals in each household upon initial occupancy of a unit.

(b) Providing transit information in the form of transit maps and schedules to each household upon initial occupancy of a unit, or providing information and a real-time transit service screen in a convenient common area of the building such as an entryway or lobby.

11.207.7 Building and Site Design Standards for New Development

11.207.7.1 General Provisions

(a) Except where otherwise stated, the Project Review requirements set forth in Article 19.000 of this Zoning Ordinance and any design standards set forth in Section 19.50 or elsewhere in the Zoning Ordinance shall be superseded by the following standards for an AHO Project.

(b) The following design standards shall apply to new construction and to additions to existing structures. Except as otherwise provided, an existing building that is altered or moved to accommodate an AHO Project shall not be subject to the following standards, provided that such alterations do not create a condition that is in greater nonconformance with such standards than the existing condition.

11.207.7.2 Site Design and Arrangement

(a) The area directly between the front lot line and the principal wall plane of the building nearest to the front lot line shall consist of any combination of landscaped area, hardscaped area accessible to pedestrians and bicyclists, and usable spaces such as uncovered porches, patios, or balconies. Parking shall not be located within such area, except for driveway access which shall be limited to a total of thirty (30) feet of width for any individual driveway for each one hundred (100) feet of lot frontage.

(b) Pedestrian entrances to buildings shall be visible from the street, except where the building itself is not visible from the street due to its location. All pedestrian entrances shall be accessible by way of access routes that are separated from motor vehicle access drives.

(c) A building footprint exceeding two hundred and fifty (250) feet in length, measured parallel to the street, contains a massing recess extending back at least fifteen (15) feet in depth measured from and perpendicular to the front lot line and at least fifteen (15) feet in width measured parallel to the front lot line so that the maximum length of unbroken façade is one hundred fifty (150) feet.

11.207.7.3 Building Façades

(a) At least twenty percent (20%) of the area of building façades facing a public street or public open space shall consist of clear glass windows. For buildings located in a Business A (BA), Business A-2 (BA-2), Business B (BB) or Business C (BC) zoning district, this figure shall be increased to thirty percent (30%) for non-residential portions of the building, if any.

(b) Building façades shall incorporate architectural elements that project or recess by at least two feet from the adjacent section of the façade. Such projecting or recessed elements shall occur on an average interval of 40 linear horizontal feet or less for portions of the façade directly facing a public street, and on an average interval of 80 linear horizontal feet or less for other portions of the façade. Such projecting or recessed elements shall not be required on the lowest Story Above Grade or on the highest Story Above Grade, and shall not be required on the highest two Stories Above Grade of a building containing at least six Stories Above Grade. The intent is to incorporate elements such as bays, balconies, cornices, shading devices, or similar architectural elements that promote visual interest and residential character, and to allow variation at the ground floor and on upper floors where a different architectural treatment may be preferable.

11.207.7.4 Ground Stories and Stories Below Grade

(a) The elevation at floor level of the Ground Story shall be at the mean Grade of the abutting public sidewalk, or above such mean Grade by not more than four feet. Active non-residential uses at the Ground Story shall be accessible directly from the sidewalk without requiring use of stairs or a lift. The requirements of this paragraph shall not apply if it is determined by the City Engineer that a higher Ground Story elevation is necessary for the purpose of flood protection.

(b) Where structured parking is provided within the Ground Story of a building, the portion of the building immediately behind the front wall plane shall consist of residential units, common areas, or other populated portions of the building in order to screen the provided parking over at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the length of the façade measured parallel to the street and excluding portions of the façade used for driveway access. On a corner lot, the requirements of this Paragraph shall only apply along one street.

(c) The façade of a Ground Story facing a public street shall consist of expanses no longer than twenty-five (25) feet in length, measured parallel to the street, which contain no transparent windows or pedestrian entryways.

(d) If the Ground Story is designed to accommodate active non-residential uses, the following additional standards shall apply:

(i) the height of the Ground Story for that portion of the building containing active non-residential uses shall be at least fifteen (15) feet;

(ii) the depth of the space designed for active non-residential uses shall be at least thirty-five (35) feet on average measured from the portion of the façade that is nearest to the front lot line in a direction perpendicular to the street, and measured to at least one street in instances where the space abuts two or more streets; and

(iii) that portion of the Ground Story façade containing active non-residential uses shall consist of at least thirty percent (30%) transparent glass windows or, if the use is a retail or consumer service establishment, at least thirty percent (30%) transparent glass windows, across the combined façade on both streets in the case of a corner lot.

(e) Ground Stories on sites that are located in a Business base zoning district may include retail or consumer establishments as well as social service facilities supporting the mission of the owner of the AHO Project.

(f) Private living spaces within dwelling units, including bedrooms, kitchens, and bathrooms, may only be contained within Stories Above Grade. Stories Below Grade may only contain portions of dwelling units providing entries, exits, or mechanical equipment, or common facilities for residents of the building, such as lobbies, recreation rooms, laundry, storage, parking, bicycle parking, or mechanical equipment.

11.207.7.5 Mechanical Equipment, Refuse Storage, and Loading Areas

All mechanical equipment, refuse storage, or loading areas serving the building or its occupants that are (1) carried above the roof, (2) located at the exterior building wall or (3) located outside the building, shall meet the requirements listed below. Mechanical equipment includes, but is not limited to, ventilation equipment including exhaust fans and ducts, air conditioning equipment, elevator bulkheads, heat exchangers, transformers and any other equipment that, when in operation, potentially creates a noise detectable off the lot. The equipment and other facilities:

(a) Shall not be located within any required setback. This Paragraph (a) shall not apply to electrical equipment whose location is mandated by a recognized public utility, provided that project plans submitted for review by the City identify a preferred location for such equipment.

(b) When on the ground, shall be permanently screened from view from adjacent public streets that are within 100 feet of the building, or from the view from abutting property in separate ownership at the property line. The screening shall consist of a dense year-round screen equal or greater in height at the time of installation than the equipment or facilities to be screened, or a fence of equal or greater height that is comparable in quality to the materials used on the principal facades of the building, with no more than twenty-five (25) percent of the face of the fence open with adjacent planting.

(c) When carried above the roof, shall be set back from the principal wall plane by a dimension equal to at least the height of the equipment and permanently screened from view, from the ground, from adjacent public streets and any abutting residentially used lot or lots in a residential zoning district. The screening shall be at least seventy-five percent (75%) opaque and uniformly distributed across the screening surface, or opaque to the maximum extent permissible if other applicable laws, codes, or regulations mandate greater openness.

(d) Shall meet all city, state and federal noise regulations, as applicable, as certified by a professional acoustical engineer if the Department of Inspectional Services deems such certification necessary.

(e) That handle trash and other waste, shall be contained within the building or screened as required in this Section until properly disposed of.

11.207.7.6 Environmental Design Standards

(a) This Section shall not waive the Green Building Requirements set forth in Section 22.20 of this Zoning Ordinance that may otherwise apply to an AHO Project.

(b) Where the provisions of the Flood Plain Overlay District apply to an AHO Project, the performance standards set forth in Section 20.70 of this Zoning Ordinance shall apply; however, a special permit shall not be required.

(c) An AHO Project shall be subject to other applicable laws, regulations, codes, and ordinances pertaining to environmental standards.

(d) New outdoor light fixtures installed in an AHO Project shall be fully shielded and directed to prevent light trespass onto adjacent residential lots.

11.207.8 Advisory Design Consultation Procedure

Prior to application for a building permit, the developer of an AHO Project shall comply with the following procedure, which is intended to provide an opportunity for non-binding community and staff input into the design of the project.

(a) The intent of this non-binding review process is to advance the City’s desired outcomes for the form and character of AHO Projects. To promote the City’s goal of creating more affordable housing units, AHO Projects are permitted to have a greater height, scale, and density than other developments permitted by the zoning for a given district. This procedure is intended to promote design outcomes that are compatible with the existing neighborhood context or with the City’s future planning objectives for the area.

(b) The City’s Design Guidelines for 100% Affordable Housing Overlay, along with other design objectives and guidelines established for the part of the city in which the AHO Project is located, are intended to inform the design of AHO Projects and to guide the Planning Board’s consultation and report as set forth below. It is intended that designers of AHO Projects, City staff, the Planning Board, and the general public will be open to creative variations from any detailed provisions set forth in such objectives and guidelines as long as the core values expressed are being served.

(c) At least two community meetings shall be scheduled at a time and location that is convenient to residents in proximity to the project site. The Community Development Department (CDD) shall be notified of the time and location of such meetings, and shall give notification to abutters, owners of land directly opposite on any public or private street or way, and abutters to the abutters within three hundred feet of the property line of the lot on which the AHO Project is proposed and to any individual or organization who each year files with CDD a written request for such notification, or to any other individual or organization CDD may wish to notify.

(i) The purpose of the first community meeting shall be for the developer to share the site and street context analysis with neighborhood residents and other interested parties prior to building design, and receive feedback from community members.

(ii) The purpose of the subsequent community meeting(s) shall be to present preliminary project designs, answer questions from neighboring residents and other interested members of the public, and receive feedback on the design. The date(s), time(s), location(s), attendance, materials presented, and comments received at such meeting(s) shall be documented and provided to CDD.

(d) Following one or more such community meeting(s), the developer shall prepare the following materials for review by the Planning Board. CDD shall review to certify that the submitted written and graphic materials provide the required information in sufficient detail. All drawings shall be drawn to scale, shall include a graphic scale and north arrow for orientation, and shall provide labeled distances and dimensions for significant building and site features.

(i) A context map indicating the location of the project and surrounding land uses, including transportation facilities.

(ii) A context analysis, discussed with CDD staff, including existing front yard setbacks, architectural character, and unique features that inform and influence the design of the AHO Project.

(iii) An existing conditions site plan depicting the boundaries of the lot, the locations of buildings, open space features, parking areas, trees, and other major site features on the lot and abutting lots, and the conditions of abutting streets.

(iv) A proposed conditions site plan depicting the same information above as modified to depict the proposed conditions, including new buildings (identifying building entrances and uses on the ground floor and possible building roof deck) and major anticipated changes in site features.

(v) A design statement on how the proposed project attempts to reinforce existing street/context qualities and mitigates the planned project’s greater massing, height, density, &c.

(vi) Floor plans of all proposed new buildings and existing buildings to remain on the lot.

(vii) Elevations and cross-section drawings of all proposed new buildings and existing buildings to remain on the lot, depicting the distances to lot lines and the heights of surrounding buildings, and labeling the proposed materials on each façade elevation.

(viii) A landscape plan depicting and labeling all hardscape, permeable, and vegetated areas proposed for the site along with other structures or appurtenances on the site.

(ix) Plans of parking and bicycle parking facilities, as required by Section 6.50 of this Zoning Ordinance.

(x) Materials palettes cataloguing and depicting with photographs the proposed façade and landscape materials.

(xi) Existing conditions photographs from various vantage points on the public sidewalk, including photos of the site and of the surrounding urban context.

(xii) Proposed conditions perspective renderings from a variety of vantage points on the public sidewalk, including locations adjacent to the site as well as longer views if proposed buildings will be visible from a distance.

(xiii) A dimensional form, in a format provided by CDD, along with any supplemental materials, summarizing the general characteristics of the project and demonstrating compliance with applicable zoning requirements.

(xiv) A brief project narrative describing the project and the design approach, and indicating how the project has been designed in relation to the citywide urban design objectives set forth in Section 19.30 of the Zoning Ordinance, any design guidelines that have been established for the area, and the Design Guidelines for the 100% Affordable Housing Overlay.

(xv) Viewshed analysis and shadow studies that show the impact on neighboring properties with existing Solar Energy Systems.

(xvi) An initial development budget that shows anticipated funding sources and uses including developer fee and overhead.

(e) Within 65 days of receipt of a complete set of materials by CDD, the Planning Board shall schedule a design consultation as a general business matter at a public meeting and shall give notification to abutters, owners of land directly opposite on any public or private street or way, and abutters to the abutters within three hundred feet of the property line of the lot on which the AHO Project is proposed and to any individual or organization who each year files with CDD a written request for such notification, or to any other individual or organization CDD may wish to notify. The materials shall be made available to the public in advance, and the Planning Board may receive written comments prior to the meeting from City staff, abutters, and members of the public.

(f) At the scheduled design consultation, the Planning Board shall hear a presentation of the proposal from the developer and oral comments from the public. The Board may ask questions or seek additional information from the developer or from City staff.

(g) The Planning Board shall evaluate the proposal for general compliance with the requirements of this Section, for consistency with City development guidelines prepared for the proposal area and the Design Guidelines for the 100% Affordable Housing Overlay, for appropriateness in terms of other planned or programmed public or private development activities in the vicinity, and for consistency with the Citywide Urban Design Objectives set forth in Section 19.30. The Board may also suggest specific project adjustments and alterations to further the purposes of this Ordinance. The Board shall communicate its findings in a written report provided to the developer and to CDD within 20 days of the design consultation.

(h) The developer may then make revisions to the design, in consultation with CDD staff, and shall submit a revised set of documents along with a narrative summary of the Planning Board’s comments and changes made in response to those comments.

(i) The Planning Board shall review and discuss the revised documents at a second design consultation meeting, which shall proceed in accordance with Paragraphs (c) and (d) above. Following the second design consultation, the Planning Board may submit a revised report and either the revised report or if there are no revisions the initial report shall become the final report (the “Final Report”). Any additional design consultations to review further revisions may occur only at the discretion and on the request of the developer or the Cambridge Affordable Housing Trust.

(j) The Final Report from the Planning Board shall be provided to the Superintendent of Buildings to certify compliance with the procedures set forth herein.

11.207.9 Implementation of Affordable Housing Overlay

(a) The City Manager shall have the authority to promulgate regulations for the implementation of the provisions of this Section 11.207. There shall be a sixty-day review period, including a public meeting, to receive public comments on draft regulations before final promulgation.

(b) The Community Development Department may develop standards, design guidelines, and procedures appropriate to and consistent with the provisions of this Sections 11.207 and the above regulations.

11.207.10 Enforcement of Affordable Housing Overlay

The Community Development Department shall certify in writing to the Superintendent of Buildings that all applicable provisions of this Section have been met before issuance of any building permit for any AHO Project, and shall further certify in writing to the Superintendent of Buildings that all documents have been filed and all actions taken necessary to fulfill the requirements of this Section before the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for any such project.

11.207.11 Review of Affordable Housing Overlay

(a) Annual Report. CDD shall provide an annual status report to the City Council, beginning eighteen (18) months after ordination and continuing every year thereafter. The report shall contain the following information:

(i) List of sites considered for affordable housing development under the Affordable Housing Overlay, to the extent known by CDD, including site location, actions taken to initiate an AHO Project, and site status;

(ii) Description of each AHO Project underway or completed, including site location, number of units, unit types (number of bedrooms), tenure, and project status; and

(iii) Number of residents served by AHO Projects.

(b) Five-Year Progress Review. Five (5) years after ordination, CDD shall provide to the City Council, Planning Board and the Affordable Housing Trust, for its review, a report that assesses the effectiveness of the Affordable Housing Overlay in increasing the number of affordable housing units in the city, distributing affordable housing across City neighborhoods, and serving the housing needs of residents. The report shall also assess the effectiveness of the Advisory Design Consultation Procedure in gathering meaningful input from community members and the Planning Board and shaping AHO Projects to be consistent with the stated Design Objectives. The report shall evaluate the success of the Affordable Housing Overlay in balancing the goal of increasing affordable housing with other City planning considerations such as urban form, neighborhood character, environment, and mobility. The report shall discuss citywide outcomes as well as site-specific outcomes.

O-3     Feb 24, 2020  Amended
MAYOR SIDDIQUI
VICE MAYOR MALLON
WHEREAS: Cambridge Public Libraries serve as a vital resource for our residents, particularly for vulnerable communities; and
WHEREAS: In 2019, 5,748 Cambridge library patrons were blocked from accessing certain library services, such as checking out, checking in, and renewing materials, because they had accumulated over $10 in library late fees; and
WHEREAS: 14% (2,402) of blocked Cambridge library patrons are under the age of 18, suggesting that a substantial number of youth are not able to access certain library services due to the burden of library fines, despite the Libraries’ policy of not charging late fees on children’s and young adult’s materials; and
WHEREAS: 24% (1367 of 5748) of blocked Cambridge library patrons (account charges > $10) are under the age of 18, suggesting that a substantial number of youth are not able to access certain library services due to the burden of library fines, despite the Libraries’ policy of not charging late fees on children’s and young adult’s materials; and
WHEREAS: In Cambridge Public Libraries, adult items currently incur a ten cent fine for each day an item is returned or renewed past its due date; and
WHEREAS: Commonwealth Catalog and Interlibrary loan adult items currently incur a $2.00 fine for each day an item is returned or renewed past its due date; and
WHEREAS: Imposing late fines does not hold a significant monetary benefit, as Cambridge Public Libraries charged $77,870 in library fines in FY19, less than .07% of the total library budget of $12.5 million a year; and
WHEREAS: Costs associated with administering library fines, including the costs of staff time, mailings, and more, also reduce the revenue accrued from imposed library fines; and
WHEREAS: Many other municipalities, including Phoenix, AZ; Dallas, TX; and Chicago, IL have experimented with eliminating late fees for all or some patrons in their own public libraries; and
WHEREAS: These municipalities have had a lot of success with eliminating late fees, experiencing increased rates of material returns, increased library patronage, and increased library access for low-income residents, who may have difficulty paying late fines, and
WHEREAS: Other municipalities have experimented with eliminating late fines only for certain groups, such as youth, seniors, or those with ADA accommodations, capping library fines at a low amount, creating “amnesty days” where late items can be returned without the charge of late fees, or asking for volunteer time or food donations in the place of money with success; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with Director of Cambridge Public Libraries to determine the feasibility of eliminating late fines in Cambridge Public Libraries, or other alternatives that would result in the same benefits to Library patrons; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Manager report back to the City Council in a timely manner.

O-5     Feb 24, 2020
COUNCILLOR SOBRINHO-WHEELER
COUNCILLOR MCGOVERN
COUNCILLOR ZONDERVAN
COUNCILLOR NOLAN
WHEREAS: In May 2018, after two years of sustained community outreach and public engagement, the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) published the Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study, a comprehensive report on planned roadway improvements to the intersection of Mt. Auburn Street, Fresh Pond Parkway, and Gerrys Landing Road; and
WHEREAS: Among the list of shared objectives established by the study’s stakeholders were goals to “calm traffic, provide clarity, and reduce crashes and severity of crashes,” to “improve connectivity and air quality, and expand mobility choices,” and to improve “safety, access, parking, and comfort for bicycles”; and
WHEREAS: A critical piece of DCR’s planned short-term safety improvements at this intersection was a “road diet” of curb extensions and traffic flow readjustments; and
WHEREAS: This plan also included a two-way protected bicycle lane that would have extended to the Charles River along Gerrys Landing Road, providing safe bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to the Eliot Bridge and Dudley White Bike Path along the river; and
WHEREAS: In a public plan update meeting on Feb 4, 2020, DCR announced its intention to postpone the consensus road diet and bike lane portions of its short-term plan in favor of a road layout that preserves the current, dangerous traffic patterns; and
WHEREAS: A two-way protected bike lane along Gerrys Landing Road would constitute a vital segment of connectivity as envisioned in the 2015 Cambridge Bicycle Plan; and
WHEREAS: Pedestrian and bicyclist safety should be a major priority at this intersection to best protect youth at nearby schools, elderly residents at the adjacent Cambridge Homes assisted living facility, and those seeking services at Mt. Auburn Hospital; and
WHEREAS: The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) has recorded 29 crashes at the intersection in question since 2017, one resulting in injury to a pedestrian and one in injury to a bicyclist; now therefore be it
RESOLVED: That the Cambridge City Council go on record asking the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) to reconsider its decision for these streets under the department’s control in Cambridge; and be it further
RESOLVED: That the City Clerk be and hereby is requested to forward suitably engrossed copies of this resolution to the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) as well as the members of Cambridge’s state legislative delegation on behalf of the entire City Council.

O-6     Feb 24, 2020
COUNCILLOR SOBRINHO-WHEELER
VICE MAYOR MALLON
COUNCILLOR ZONDERVAN
MAYOR SIDDIQUI
WHEREAS: Public transit is an important transportation option for Cambridge residents, with nearly one-third of residents commuting via public transit and lower-income commuters being disproportionately likely to depend on bus service; and
WHEREAS: Traffic in the Boston Metropolitan Area, including Cambridge, has gotten worse in the preceding years and has had serious negative effects on Cambridge residents and contributed adversely to climate change; and
WHEREAS: One study in Cambridge has demonstrated that nearly 60% of commuters are travelling by bus on some stretches of streets while more than 97% of the vehicle traffic on those same streets are cars and only 3% are buses; and
WHEREAS: Cambridge streets including Massachusetts Avenue between Western Avenue and Memorial Drive have been identified as having both high bus ridership and significant delays in bus service; and
WHEREAS: Bus lanes have been shown to be effective in improving bus service, shortening commute times, and reducing overall traffic in the areas they have been implemented; and
WHEREAS: Bus lanes need to be implemented concurrently with fully separate protected bicycle lanes in order to achieve safety, access and equity for all users; and
WHEREAS: Many of Cambridge’s major streets, including Massachusetts Avenue, have space for dedicated bus lanes, protected bicycle lanes, and sidewalks that are fully separated from each other and from other motor vehicle traffic, provided that space is allocated more equitably; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and is hereby requested to confer with relevant City departments and the MBTA on the feasibility of implementing additional dedicated bus lanes, as well as fully separate protected bicycle lanes, on Massachusetts Avenue and other street corridors with high bus ridership; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to report back to the City Council in a timely manner.

O-7     Feb 24, 2020  Amended
COUNCILLOR NOLAN
COUNCILLOR SIMMONS
COUNCILLOR SOBRINHO-WHEELER
COUNCILLOR MCGOVERN
COUNCILLOR ZONDERVAN
WHEREAS: The City Council has passed three orders requesting the City Manager allocate funds for a comprehensive feasibility study of municipal broadband; and
WHEREAS: Internet access is indispensable in the 21st century, and while Cambridge is seen as a technology and innovation hub, the City suffers from a lack of internet provider competition, and has unusually low speeds and service, prompting over 1,300 residents to sign a petition calling for the City to take action; and
WHEREAS: Between 50 and 60 percent of low-income households in Cambridge do not have access to broadband, creating a significant disadvantage for seeking employment, educational opportunities, and when looking to access timely information in regard to City services; and
WHEREAS: The cost of broadband has a significant impact on the operations cost for local businesses and startups, creating an additional hurdle for their ability to survive in Cambridge; and
WHEREAS: The City Council has included “Equitable” and “Innovative” in its goals and guiding principles, striving to provide equal opportunity to all residents and supporting the people and institutions that are inventing new ways to make life better; and
WHEREAS: Over 50 cities and towns across the country, including seven in Massachusetts, have already implemented a city-wide municipal broadband network; and
WHEREAS: The majority of these municipal networks have surpassed their signup goals since implementation, including Longmont, Colorado (pop. 95,000), where an attempt to reach 37 percent of the market within five years has resulted in 54 percent of the market utilizing the municipal network in less than that time; and
WHEREAS: Municipal broadband is unlike other services that cities provide free of charge, because while residents will save up to 50% on their internet costs and receive faster and more reliable service, the City’s investment in broadband will also pay for itself overtime; and
WHEREAS: The City Manager appointed a Broadband Task Force in 2014, which spent over two years evaluating the options the City had at its disposal, and recommended a feasibility study to understand the costs of such a program since no meaningful estimate exists at this time; and
WHEREAS: The Digital Equity working group will provide valuable findings regarding the digital divide in Cambridge, but that work must not delay understanding the cost and feasibility of establishing municipal broadband; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to produce a Request For Proposal for the municipal broadband feasibility study that was called for by the City's Broadband Task Force back in August 2016, and to report back on this matter to the City Council no later than May 1.
ORDERED That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to provide an update to the City Council on the progress on the Digital Equity Study at the next regular meeting of the City Council.